| Literature DB >> 25811634 |
Mario Frias1, Antonio Rivero-Juarez1, Ana Gordon1, Angela Camacho1, Sara Cantisan1, Francisca Cuenca-Lopez1, Julian Torre-Cisneros1, Jose Peña2, Antonio Rivero1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: A prospective analysis of the distribution of NK subsets and natural cytotoxicity receptors (NKp30/NKp46) in HIV patients with long-term HAART use and sustained virological and immunological response.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25811634 PMCID: PMC4374841 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121019
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Flow cytometric analysis of NKp30 and NKp46 natural cytotoxicity receptors.
The figure shows the percentage of cells expressing NKp30 and NKp46 and normalized mean fluorescence intensity values for total CD56+ NK cells and CD56dimand CD56bright subsets. The values are expressed as medians with interquartile range. The analysis compared HIV-infected patients and healthy donors.
Percentages of NKp30+ and NKp46+ cells among HIV-patients according to various clinical variables.
|
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | <43 | 23 (19.4–27.9) | p = 0.234 | 21.8 (17.9–30.7) | p = 0.379 |
| ≥43 | 27.1 (23–30.6) | 25.9 (20.7–29.9) | |||
| AIDS in past (criteria) | AIDS | 28.4 (22.9–30.7) | p = 0.233 | 24.9 (19.7–30.1) | p = 0.730 |
| Non-AIDS | 23.6 (19.4–27.5) | 24.8 (18.1–30.5) | |||
| Nadir CD4 (cel/mL) | <258 | 27 (22.9–31.2) | p = 0.246 | 24.9 (19.8–30.4) | p = 0.644 |
| ≥258 | 23.1 (19.1–29.1) | 24.5 (17.5–31.5) | |||
| Current CD4 (cel/mL) | <652 | 23.4 (19.3–29.4) | p = 0.428 | 22.6 (18.2–30.2) | p = 0.607 |
| ≥652 | 26.5 (21.3–32) | 24.9 (20.2–30.4) | |||
| Increase CD4 (cel/mL) | <458 | 24.7 (19.3–28.7) | p = 0.627 | 22.6 (17.5–32.8) | p = 0.513 |
| ≥458 | 25.6 (21.3–31.2) | 25.9 (20.2–29.4) | |||
| UVL | <85 | 23 (18.5–27.1) |
| 19.8 (16.3–24.8) |
|
| ≥85 | 27.6 (23.2–33.1) | 28.1 (24.6–31.6) | |||
| Healthydonors | 58.6 (46–76.2) | 50.5 (41.9–80.9) | |||
Percentages of NCR expression are presented as median and interquartile range (Q1-Q3). The percentage of “NKp30+ cells” and “NKp46+ cells” was calculated with respect to the total population of CD56+NK cells. The p values were obtained by the Mann–Whitney U test.
aundetectable viral load
Fig 2Graph for bivariate analysis between time with undetectable viral load and frequency of NKp30/NKp46+ cells.
The percentage of NK cells expressing NKp30 (Spearman rho, r = 0.47 p = 0.002) and NKp46 receptors (Spearman rho, r = 0.45 p = 0.004) correlate positively with length of time with undetectable viral load.
Multivariate linear regression model for percentage of NKp30+ and NKp46+ cells.
| NKp30+ cells | NKp46+ cells | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | 95% CI | p | B | 95% CI | p | |
| Age | −0.186 | −0.508; 0.155 | 0.286 | −0.165 | −0.570; 0.220 | 0.373 |
| Nadir CD4+ | −0.254 | −0.039; 0.006 | 0.148 | −0.239 | −0.044; 0.010 | 0.200 |
| Δ CD4+ | −0.237 | −0.019; 0.004 | 0.171 | −0.231 | −0.022; 0.005 | 0.208 |
| Undetectable VL | 0.549 | 0.044; 0.195 |
| 0.434 | 0.016; 0.196 |
|
a Coefficient;
b Increase CD4+ = current CD4+ count-Nadir CD4+ count;
c length of time with an undetectable viral load (months).
Model R2 values for NKp30+ cells (R2 = 0.287) and NKp46+ (R2 = 0.192)