Literature DB >> 25811090

How memory-based movement leads to nonterritorial spatial segregation.

Louise Riotte-Lambert1, Simon Benhamou, Simon Chamaillé-Jammes.   

Abstract

Home ranges (HRs) are a remarkably common form of animal space use, but we still lack an integrated view of the individual-level processes that can lead to their emergence and maintenance, particularly when individuals are in competition for resources. We built a spatially explicit mechanistic movement model to investigate how simple memory-based foraging rules may enable animals to establish HRs and to what extent this increases their foraging efficiency compared to individuals that do not base foraging decisions on memory. We showed that these simple rules enable individuals to perform better than individuals using the most efficient strategy that does not rely on memory and drive them to spatially segregate through avoidance of resource patches used by others. This striking result questions the common assumption that low HR overlaps are indicators of territorial behavior. Indeed, it appears that, by using an information-updating system, individuals can keep their environment relatively predictable without paying the cost of defending an exclusive space. However, memory-based foraging strategies leading to HR emergence seem unable to prevent the disruptive effects of the arrival of new individuals. This calls for further research on the mechanisms that can stabilize HR spatial organization in the long term.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25811090     DOI: 10.1086/680009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  7 in total

Review 1.  What do territory owners defend against?

Authors:  Martin Hinsch; Jan Komdeur
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Truly sedentary? The multi-range tactic as a response to resource heterogeneity and unpredictability in a large herbivore.

Authors:  Ophélie Couriot; A J Mark Hewison; Sonia Saïd; Francesca Cagnacci; Simon Chamaillé-Jammes; John D C Linnell; Atle Mysterud; Wibke Peters; Ferdinando Urbano; Marco Heurich; Petter Kjellander; Sandro Nicoloso; Anne Berger; Pavel Sustr; Max Kroeschel; Leif Soennichsen; Robin Sandfort; Benedikt Gehr; Nicolas Morellet
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Emergent weak home-range behaviour without spatial memory.

Authors:  Tomoko Sakiyama; Yukio-Pegio Gunji
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 2.963

4.  Spatial memory shapes density dependence in population dynamics.

Authors:  Louise Riotte-Lambert; Simon Benhamou; Christophe Bonenfant; Simon Chamaillé-Jammes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Preference and familiarity mediate spatial responses of a large herbivore to experimental manipulation of resource availability.

Authors:  Nathan Ranc; Paul R Moorcroft; K Whitney Hansen; Federico Ossi; Tobia Sforna; Enrico Ferraro; Alessandro Brugnoli; Francesca Cagnacci
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Territory surveillance and prey management: Wolves keep track of space and time.

Authors:  Ulrike E Schlägel; Evelyn H Merrill; Mark A Lewis
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-09-09       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 7.  Revisiting foraging approaches in neuroscience.

Authors:  Sam Hall-McMaster; Fabrice Luyckx
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.282

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.