| Literature DB >> 25810880 |
Mohammad-Foad Noorbakhsh1, Hossein-Ali Arab1, Hamid-Reza Kazerani2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to examine the hypothesis that an antiarrhythmic effect might be obtained by ischemic preconditioning of the liver, and also to characterize the potential underlying mechanisms.Entities:
Keywords: Ischemia-reperfusion arrhythmia; Isolated heart; Liver; Remote ischemic; preconditioning
Year: 2015 PMID: 25810880 PMCID: PMC4366748
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Basic Med Sci ISSN: 2008-3866 Impact factor: 2.699
Pre-ischemic and post-ischemic values of hemodynamic parameters in different groups of isolated perfused rat hearts. The ischemia-reperfusion was induced in the isolated heart by 30 min ischemia followed by 90 min reperfusion, the remote ischemic preconditioning was induced by 3 cycles of 5 min liver ischemia followed by 5 min of reperfusion, and the KATP channel blocker was injected into the animal 30 and 15 min before induction of remote ischemic preconditioning
| Preischemia | End of ischemia | Reperfusion time (min) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 15 | 30 | 60 | 90 | |||
| Sham | 216.8±4.1 | 209.7±11.9 | 211.5±8.1 | 212.2±7.5 | 208.3±9.3 | 197.7±10.6 | 193±13.4 |
| Ischemia/Reperfusion | 247.5±11.4 | a0 | 246.2±13.4 | 242.2±12.5 | 235.6±16.6 | 214.47±7.2 | 214.5±6.3 |
| Control | 238.9±11.3 | a0 | 236.6±17.8 | 217.19±13.7 | 210.8±17.4 | 214.7±5.9 | 203.2±4.87 |
| Treatment | 249.3±5.8 | a0 | 260.7±17.04 | 232.4±16.2 | 241.1±10.1 | 232.2±7.3 | 226.7±11.3 |
| Control (Gliben) | 240.46±11.4 | a0 | 239.21±13.4 | 235.2±12.5 | 228.55±16.6 | 207.41±7.2 | 207.51±6.3 |
| Control (5-HD) | 249.00±13.4 | a0 | 226.63±12.6 | 225.93±9.8 | 227.6±12.6 | 220.96±14.7 | 205±4.8 |
| Treatment (Gliben) | 235.80±12.5 | a0 | 239.06±11.8 | 224.21±15.8 | 209.60±9.5 | 211.00±9.6 | 207.35±9.5 |
| Treatment (5-HD) | 254.6±8.6 | a0 | 239.14±15.7 | 228.80±12.2 | 215.16±7.1 | 216.18±9.9 | 215.33±11.4 |
| Sham | 90.5±5 | 88.75±6.5 | 90.96±6.1 | 82.09±9.8 | 89.02±7.8 | 86.72±7.8 | 85.22±7.9 |
| Ischemia/Reperfusion | 94.66±1.8 | a0 | 71.02±4.5 | 77.09±6.7 | 77.71±4.7 | 71.56±3.5 | 65.4.±1.2 |
| control | 76.42±4.3 | a0 | 61.47±7.6 | 54.47±4.2 | 55.64±6.7 | 50.94±8.1 | 47.42±6.2 |
| Treatment | 92.69±3.6 | a0 | 87.66±3.4 | 98.08±6.5 | 97.68±2.7 | 94.03±3.3 | 91.62±5.2 |
| Control (Glibenclamide) | 51.38±2.6 | a0 | 50.36±2.3 | 48.95±1.9 | 53.12±3.3 | 50.61±3.1 | 50.03±3.0 |
| Control (5-HD) | 58.62±2.5 | a0 | 55.33±1.3 | 53.49±1.8 | 55.95±3.8 | 53.93±2.0 | 50.95±2.9 |
| Treatment (Glibenclamide) | 49.97±2.7 | a0 | 50.61±1.75 | 47.7±1.62 | 46,16±1.8 | 48.9±2.5 | 48.98±2.5 |
| Treatment (5-HD) | 53.17±4.0 | a0 | 48.25±1.8 | 46.10±2.7 | 45.17±2.1 | 47.58±2.8 | 49.47±1.4 |
| Sham | 2620±213 | 2707±186 | 2676 ±238 | 2527±303 | 2567±270 | 2553±316 | 2476±366 |
| Ischemia/Reperfusion | 2835±88 | a25±0.6 | a1917±41 | b2022±94 | b2111±131 | ab1843±71 | ab1825.±79 |
| Control | 2254±157 | a26±0.1 | a1976±171 | ab1863±204 | b1983±169 | ab1651±153 | ab1653±178 |
| Treatment | 2806±127 | a26±0.1 | 2353±71 | 3125±185 | 3286±30 | 3373±81 | 3204±158 |
| Control (Glibenclamide) | 3161±157 | a26±0.6 | 2147±41 | b2252±94 | b2341±131 | 2040±66b | b1988±42 |
| Control (5-HD) | 2667±199 | a26±0.2 | 2007±76 | b2140±36 | b2096±146 | b1982±85 | b1938±120 |
| Treatment (Glibenclamide) | 2390±206 | a26±0.1 | 1783±170 | b2097±253 | b2057±173 | b1976±235 | b1908±162 |
| Treatment (5-HD) | 2851±147 | a26±0.05 | 1971±99 | b2364±79 | b2383±45 | b2146±98 | b2138±51 |
Data are means±SEM, n = 6 in each group, HR – heart rate (beats/min), CPP– coronary perfusion pressure (ml min-1), Max dp/dt (mmHg/s), a=P<0.0001vs. sham, b=P<0.05 vs. test
Figure 1Effects of hepatic remote ischemic preconditioning and KATP channel blockers on the ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) -induced total arrhythmias in the isolated perfused rat heart. Values are expressed as means ± S.E.M. of 6 isolated hearts per group in which a= P<0.05 vs. control, b=P<0.05 vs. treatment (glibenclamide), c=P<0.05 vs. treatment (5-hydroxydecanoate)
Figure 2Effects of hepatic remote ischemic preconditioning and KATP channel blockers on ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) -induced single arrhythmias in the isolated perfused rat heart. Values are expressed as means±SEM of 6 hearts per group in which a= P<0.05 vs. control, b=P<0.05 vs. treatment (glibenclamide), c=P<0.05 vs. treatment (5-hydroxydecanoate)
Figure 3Effects of hepatic remote ischemic preconditioning and KATP channel blockers on ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) -induced ventricular arrhythmias in the isolated perfused rat heart. A: Number of episodes of ventricular tachycardia. B: Duration of ventricular tachycardia. VT-ventricular tachycardia. Values are expressed as means±SEM of 6 hearts per group in which a= P<0.05 vs. control, b=P<0.05 vs. treatment (glibenclamide), c=P<0.05 vs. treatment(5-hydroxydecanoate)
Figure 4Effects of hepatic remote ischemic preconditioning and KATP channel blockers on ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) -induced ventricular arrhythmias in the isolated perfused rat heart. A: Number of episodes of ventricular fibrilation. B: Duration of ventricular fibrilation. VF- ventricular fibrillation. Values are expressed as means ± S.E.M. of 6 hearts per group in which a= P<0.0001 vs. treatment, b=P<0.001 vs. treatment (glibenclamide), c=P<0.001 vs. treatment (5-hydroxydecanoate)