Literature DB >> 25809958

A multifaceted hospitalist quality improvement intervention: Decreased frequency of common labs.

Adam H Corson1, Vincent S Fan2, Travis White1, Sean D Sullivan3, Kenji Asakura1, Michael Myint4, Christopher R Dale4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Common labs such as a daily complete blood count or a daily basic metabolic panel represent possible waste and have been targeted by professional societies and the Choosing Wisely campaign for critical evaluation. We undertook a multifaceted quality-improvement (QI) intervention in a large community hospitalist group to decrease unnecessary common labs.
METHODS: The QI intervention was composed of academic detailing, audit and feedback, and transparent reporting of the frequency with which common labs were ordered as daily within the hospitalist group. We performed a pre-post analysis, comparing a cohort of patients during the 10-month baseline period before the QI intervention and the 7-month intervention period. Demographic and clinical data were collected from the electronic medical record. The primary endpoint was number of common labs ordered per patient-day as estimated by a clustered multivariable linear regression model clustering by ordering hospitalist. Secondary endpoints included length of stay, hospital mortality, 30-day readmission, blood transfusion, amount of blood transfused, and laboratory cost per patient.
RESULTS: The baseline (n = 7824) and intervention (n = 5759) cohorts were similar in their demographics, though the distribution of primary discharge diagnosis-related groups differed. At baseline, a mean of 2.06 (standard deviation 1.40) common labs were ordered per patient-day. Adjusting for age, sex, and principle discharge diagnosis, the number of common labs ordered per patient-day decreased by 0.22 (10.7%) during the intervention period compared to baseline (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.34 to 0.11; P < 0.01). There were nonsignificant reductions in hospital mortality in the intervention period compared to baseline (2.2% vs 1.8%, P = 0.1) as well as volume of blood transfused in patients who received a transfusion (127.2 mL decrease; 95% CI, -257.9 to 3.6; P = 0.06). No effect was seen on length of stay or readmission rate. The intervention decreased hospital direct costs by an estimated $16.19 per admission or $151,682 annualized (95% CI, $119,746 to $187,618).
CONCLUSION: Implementation of a multifaceted QI intervention within a community-based hospitalist group was associated with a significant, but modest, decrease in the number of ordered lab tests and hospital costs. No effect was seen on hospital length of stay, mortality, or readmission rate. This intervention suggests that a community-based hospitalist QI intervention focused on daily labs can be effective in safely reducing healthcare waste without compromising quality of care.
© 2015 Society of Hospital Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25809958     DOI: 10.1002/jhm.2354

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hosp Med        ISSN: 1553-5592            Impact factor:   2.960


  14 in total

1.  Treating, Fast and Slow: Americans' Understanding of and Responses to Low-Value Care.

Authors:  Mark Schlesinger; Rachel Grob
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  Internal Medicine Resident Engagement with a Laboratory Utilization Dashboard: Mixed Methods Study.

Authors:  Gregory Kurtzman; Jessica Dine; Andrew Epstein; Yevgenly Gitelman; Damien Leri; Miltesh S Patel; Kyra Ryskina
Journal:  J Hosp Med       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.960

3.  Optimizing laboratory test utilization in long-term acute care hospitals.

Authors:  Adan Mora; Brian S Krug; Antony M Grigonis; Amanda Dawson; Yuqing Jing; Samuel I Hammerman
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2017-01

4.  Low Diagnostic Utility of Rechecking Hemoglobins Within 24 Hours in Hospitalized Patients.

Authors:  Alvin Rajkomar; Charles E McCulloch; Margaret C Fang
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  Resident-Sensitive Processes of Care: Impact of Surgical Residents on Inpatient Testing.

Authors:  Clifford C Sheckter; Jeffrey Jopling; Qian Ding; Amber W Trickey; Todd Wagner; Arden M Morris; Mary T Hawn
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 6.  Reducing Test Utilization in Hospital Settings: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Renuka S Bindraban; Maarten J Ten Berg; Christiana A Naaktgeboren; Mark H H Kramer; Wouter W Van Solinge; Prabath W B Nanayakkara
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 3.464

7.  Self-reported test ordering practices among Canadian internal medicine physicians and trainees: a multicenter cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Thomas Bodley; Janice L Kwan; John Matelski; Patrick J Darragh; Peter Cram
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Expert Recommendations on Frequency of Utilization of Common Laboratory Tests in Medical Inpatients: a Canadian Consensus Study.

Authors:  Anshula Ambasta; Stefana Pancic; Brian M Wong; Todd Lee; Deirdre McCaughey; Irene W Y Ma
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  A multi-level strategy for a long lasting reduction in unnecessary laboratory testing: A multicenter before and after study in a teaching hospital network.

Authors:  Yannick Erard; Rosaria Del Giorno; Anna Zasa; Simone De Gottardi; Roberto Della Bruna; Franco Keller; Luca Clivio; Angela Greco; Olivier Giannini; Luca Gabutti
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  Prevalence and Predictability of Low-Yield Inpatient Laboratory Diagnostic Tests.

Authors:  Song Xu; Jason Hom; Santhosh Balasubramanian; Lee F Schroeder; Nader Najafi; Shivaal Roy; Jonathan H Chen
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-09-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.