Literature DB >> 25809836

Human rights of children with intellectual disabilities: comparing self-ratings and proxy ratings.

K Huus1, M Granlund1, J Bornman2, F Lygnegård1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A child rights-based approach to research articulates well with Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) and highlights the importance and value of including children's own views about aspects that concern them. The aim of this study is to compare children with intellectual disability's own ratings (as self-raters) to those of their primary caregivers (as proxy raters) regarding human rights of children. The study also aims to establish whether there is an inter-rater agreement between the self-raters and proxy raters concerning Maslow's hierarchy of needs.
METHOD: This study is nested in a larger study examining the human rights of children with intellectual disability in South Africa. In total, 162 children with intellectual disability from 11 schools across three provinces and their primary caregivers participated by answering parts of a Children's Rights Questionnaire (CRQ) developed by the researchers based on the United Nation's CRC. We compared the answers for six questions in the questionnaire that were addressed to self-raters (children) and proxy raters (primary caregivers) in the same way.
RESULTS: Questions regarding basic needs, such as access to clean water or whether the child had food to eat at home, were answered similarly by self-raters and proxy raters. Larger differences were found when self-raters and proxy raters were asked about whether the child had things or friends to play with at home. Socio-economic variables seemed to affect whether self-raters and proxy raters answered similarly.
CONCLUSION: The results underscore the importance of promoting children's rights to express themselves by considering the opinions of both the children as self-raters and their primary caregivers as proxy raters - not only the latter. The results indicate that it is especially important to include children's own voices when more complex needs are surveyed. Agreement between self- and proxy ratings could be affected by socio-economic circumstances.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  childhood disability; children's rights; intellectual disability; proxy ratings; self-report

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25809836     DOI: 10.1111/cch.12244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Child Care Health Dev        ISSN: 0305-1862            Impact factor:   2.508


  5 in total

1.  Voices of children with intellectual disabilities on participation in daily activities.

Authors:  Karina Huus; Refilwe Morwane; Maria Ramaahlo; Sadna Balton; Emelie Pettersson; Ingalill Gimbler Berglund; Shakila Dada
Journal:  Afr J Disabil       Date:  2021-07-05

2.  Intellectual developmental disorders in Mexico: a call for programmes promoting independence and inclusion.

Authors:  Gregorio Katz; Edgar Corona; Eduardo Lazcano-Ponce
Journal:  BJPsych Int       Date:  2016-08-01

Review 3.  Intellectual disability rights and inclusive citizenship in South Africa: What can a scoping review tell us?

Authors:  Charlotte Capri; Lameze Abrahams; Judith McKenzie; Ockert Coetzee; Siyabulela Mkabile; Manuel Saptouw; Andrew Hooper; Peter Smith; Colleen Adnams; Leslie Swartz
Journal:  Afr J Disabil       Date:  2018-04-25

4.  Children in South Africa with and without Intellectual Disabilities' Rating of Their Frequency of Participation in Everyday Activities.

Authors:  Alecia Samuels; Shakila Dada; Karin Van Niekerk; Patrik Arvidsson; Karina Huus
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Structural validity and internal consistency of Picture My Participation: A measure for children with disability.

Authors:  Patrik Arvidsson; Shakila Dada; Mats Granlund; Christine Imms; Lin Jun Shi; Lin Ju Kang; Ai-Wen Hwang; Karina Huus
Journal:  Afr J Disabil       Date:  2021-05-28
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.