OBJECTIVES: Identification of optimal predictors of the 5.5-year survival in former geriatric inpatients.Investigation of the direction and shape of the relationship between mortality risk and its predictors. DESIGN: Retrospective survival analysis with the application of the Cox proportional hazards model. SETTING: Teaching geriatric unit. PARTICIPANTS: 478 inpatients (mean age 77.9; +6.8) discharged from geriatric ward during year 2008, without any exclusion criteria. MEASUREMENTS: Comprehensive geriatric assessment of numerous health variables, body mass index (BMI), clinical and biochemical findings, and outcomes of the final diagnosis. Records on the dates of deaths were obtained from the Provincial Office of Population Register. RESULTS: During the 5.5-year follow-up 209 (43.7%) patients died. In the multivariate setup, six risk factors with an independent impact on mortality were identified: age (p=0.036), cognitive functioning on the Blessed test (p=0.005), score on instrumental ADL (p<0.0001), score on Charlson comorbidity index (p<0.0001), cholesterol level (p<0.0001), BMI (p<0.0001), and hemoglobin level (p=0.02). The latter two predictors exhibited a significant inverted J-shaped association with mortality, i.e., considerably higher risk of death corresponds to the lower values of these variables in comparison to their higher levels. CONCLUSION: Older age, worse IADL and cognitive functioning, and higher comorbidity were recognized as endangering one's long-term survival. On the other hand, moderate obesity (BMI 36), higher cholesterol and the absence of anemia (hemoglobin 13.6 g/dL) are associated with longer survival. Therefore, irrespective of the individualized treatment and physical exercise, nutrient-dense food seems to be a key recommendation to prevent frailty or malnutrition in the oldest and comorbid population.
OBJECTIVES: Identification of optimal predictors of the 5.5-year survival in former geriatric inpatients.Investigation of the direction and shape of the relationship between mortality risk and its predictors. DESIGN: Retrospective survival analysis with the application of the Cox proportional hazards model. SETTING: Teaching geriatric unit. PARTICIPANTS: 478 inpatients (mean age 77.9; +6.8) discharged from geriatric ward during year 2008, without any exclusion criteria. MEASUREMENTS: Comprehensive geriatric assessment of numerous health variables, body mass index (BMI), clinical and biochemical findings, and outcomes of the final diagnosis. Records on the dates of deaths were obtained from the Provincial Office of Population Register. RESULTS: During the 5.5-year follow-up 209 (43.7%) patients died. In the multivariate setup, six risk factors with an independent impact on mortality were identified: age (p=0.036), cognitive functioning on the Blessed test (p=0.005), score on instrumental ADL (p<0.0001), score on Charlson comorbidity index (p<0.0001), cholesterol level (p<0.0001), BMI (p<0.0001), and hemoglobin level (p=0.02). The latter two predictors exhibited a significant inverted J-shaped association with mortality, i.e., considerably higher risk of death corresponds to the lower values of these variables in comparison to their higher levels. CONCLUSION: Older age, worse IADL and cognitive functioning, and higher comorbidity were recognized as endangering one's long-term survival. On the other hand, moderate obesity (BMI 36), higher cholesterol and the absence of anemia (hemoglobin 13.6 g/dL) are associated with longer survival. Therefore, irrespective of the individualized treatment and physical exercise, nutrient-dense food seems to be a key recommendation to prevent frailty or malnutrition in the oldest and comorbid population.
Authors: Päivi Tuikkala; Sirpa Hartikainen; Maarit J Korhonen; Piia Lavikainen; Raimo Kettunen; Raimo Sulkava; Hannes Enlund Journal: Scand J Prim Health Care Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 2.581
Authors: Bernd Rechel; Emily Grundy; Jean-Marie Robine; Jonathan Cylus; Johan P Mackenbach; Cecile Knai; Martin McKee Journal: Lancet Date: 2013-03-27 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Jan-Magnus Kvamme; Jostein Holmen; Tom Wilsgaard; Jon Florholmen; Kristian Midthjell; Bjarne K Jacobsen Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2011-02-14 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Halfdan Petursson; Johann A Sigurdsson; Calle Bengtsson; Tom I L Nilsen; Linn Getz Journal: J Eval Clin Pract Date: 2011-09-25 Impact factor: 2.431
Authors: E Frangos; A Trombetti; C E Graf; V Lachat; N Samaras; U M Vischer; D Zekry; R Rizzoli; F R Herrmann Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2016 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: F Monacelli; M Sartini; V Bassoli; D Becchetti; A L Biagini; A Nencioni; M Cea; R Borghi; F Torre; P Odetti Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2017 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: I García-Nogueras; I Aranda-Reneo; L M Peña-Longobardo; J Oliva-Moreno; P Abizanda Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2017 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: F Neelemaat; S van Keeken; J A E Langius; M A E de van der Schueren; A Thijs; J E Bosmans Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2017 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Lisa Schlender; Yolanda V Martinez; Charles Adeniji; David Reeves; Barbara Faller; Christina Sommerauer; Thekraiat Al Qur'an; Adrine Woodham; Ilkka Kunnamo; Andreas Sönnichsen; Anna Renom-Guiteras Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2017-10-16 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Seon Ha Baek; Sung Woo Lee; Sun-Wook Kim; Shin Young Ahn; Mi-Yeon Yu; Kwang-Il Kim; Ho Jun Chin; Ki Young Na; Dong-Wan Chae; Sejoong Kim Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-06-03 Impact factor: 3.240