Literature DB >> 25809493

The physiological cost of reproduction for rich and poor across 65 countries.

Daniel J Hruschka1, Ashley Hagaman1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: One of the fundamental tradeoffs posited in life history theory is between storing energy for future reproduction versus spending that energy on current reproduction. However, past studies have shown variable and sometimes contradictory effects of reproduction on energy stores among women.
METHODS: To examine how varying economic resources can account for these diverse findings, we applied mixed models to Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data from 187,848 nulliparous and primiparous women of reproductive age (20-34 years) in 65 countries varying widely in economic resources. Using this approach, we tracked average trajectories of body mass through pregnancy and the post-partum period, and assessed how these trajectories varied by household wealth and breastfeeding.
RESULTS: In all four wealth categories, sustained breastfeeding posed a substantial tradeoff with energy stores, reducing post-partum BMI by 0.5 to 1.0 kg m(-2) relative to non-breastfeeding women. However, among the wealthiest households (>6,400 USD per capita), this deficit was buffered substantially by greater pre-partum weight gain (+1.1 kg m(-2) compared to women from the poorest households).
CONCLUSION: These findings show how the level of economic resources can systematically and profoundly shape a physiological tradeoff in reproduction, and can help account for past contradictory findings. More broadly, these results illustrate how integrating economic and energetic resources in a common framework can help clarify the apparently disparate weight-related outcomes of fertility in different countries.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25809493     DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.22707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Biol        ISSN: 1042-0533            Impact factor:   1.937


  4 in total

1.  Life-history tradeoffs in a historical population (1896-1939) undergoing rapid fertility decline: Costs of reproduction?

Authors:  Adrian V Jaeggi; Jordan S Martin; Joël Floris; Nicole Bender; Martin Haeusler; Rebecca Sear; Kaspar Staub
Journal:  Evol Hum Sci       Date:  2022-02-21

2.  How does variance in fertility change over the demographic transition?

Authors:  Daniel J Hruschka; Oskar Burger
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Estimating the absolute wealth of households.

Authors:  Daniel J Hruschka; Drew Gerkey; Craig Hadley
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 9.408

4.  Reduced costs of reproduction in females mediate a shift from a male-biased to a female-biased lifespan in humans.

Authors:  Elisabeth Bolund; Virpi Lummaa; Ken R Smith; Heidi A Hanson; Alexei A Maklakov
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.