Literature DB >> 25809209

Clinical outcomes of mammography in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 2009-2012.

Arica White1, Jacqueline Miller, Janet Royalty, A Blythe Ryerson, Vicki Benard, William Helsel, William Kammerer.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP) enrolls asymptomatic women for cancer screening and symptomatic women for diagnostic services. This study describes the results of mammograms provided by the NBCCEDP, by examination indication (screening or diagnostic), and by age group.
METHODS: For the first NBCCEDP-funded mammogram received during 2009-2012, we calculated age-specific percentages of abnormal findings, rates of follow-up testing, and invasive and in situ breast cancer diagnoses per 1,000 mammograms. Logistic regression was used to estimate the odds for each of these outcomes by examination indication.
RESULTS: The NBCCEDP provided 941,649 screening, 175,310 diagnostic, and 30,434 unknown indication mammograms to 1,147,393 women. The percentage with abnormal mammograms was higher for diagnostic mammograms (40.1 %) than for screening mammograms (15.5 %). Compared with women aged 40-49 years, fewer women aged 50-64 years had abnormal results for screening (13.7 vs. 19.7 %) and diagnostic mammograms (37.7 vs. 42.7 %). Follow-up rates per 1,000 mammograms were lower among women aged 50-64 compared to those aged 40-49 (screening: 143.9 vs. 207.5; diagnostic: 645.3 vs. 760.9); biopsy rates exhibited a similar pattern (screening: 24.1 vs. 32.9; diagnostic: 167.7 vs. 169.7). For screening mammograms, older women had more cancers detected than younger women (invasive: 3.6 vs. 2.2; in situ: 2.3 vs. 2.0). Similarly, for diagnostic mammograms, cancer detection was higher for older women (invasive: 67.8 vs. 36.6; in situ: 17.4 vs. 11.1).
CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal mammograms and diagnostic follow-up procedures were less frequent in women aged 50-64 years compared to women aged 40-49 years, while breast cancer detection was higher, regardless of indication for the mammogram. Some of these differences between age groups were greater for screening mammograms than for diagnostic mammograms. Cancer detection rates were higher for diagnostic mammograms compared with screening mammograms. These findings support the NBCCEDP's priority of serving women aged 50-64 years and providing both screening and diagnostic mammograms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25809209      PMCID: PMC4484795          DOI: 10.1007/s10552-015-0567-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Causes Control        ISSN: 0957-5243            Impact factor:   2.506


  5 in total

1.  Breast cancer screening among low-income or uninsured women: results from the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, July 1995 to March 2002 (United States).

Authors:  Christie R Eheman; Vicki B Benard; Donald Blackman; Herschel W Lawson; Christa Anderson; William Helsel; Nancy C Lee
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  Effect of age and breast density on screening mammograms with false-positive findings.

Authors:  C D Lehman; E White; S Peacock; M J Drucker; N Urban
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women.

Authors:  D S May; N C Lee; M R Nadel; R M Henson; D S Miller
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Breast cancer screening of underserved women in the USA: results from the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 1998-2012.

Authors:  David H Howard; Florence K L Tangka; Janet Royalty; Lucinda P Dalzell; Jacqueline Miller; Brett O'Hara; Kristy Joseph; Kristy Kenney; Gery Guy; Ingrid J Hall
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 25.391

  5 in total
  6 in total

1.  Preventing premature deaths from breast and cervical cancer among underserved women in the United States: insights gained from a national cancer screening program.

Authors:  Mary C White; Faye L Wong
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  Forward. The reach and health impacts of the national breast and cervical cancer early detection program.

Authors:  Gery P Guy; Florence K L Tangka; Ingrid J Hall; Jacqueline W Miller; Janet Royalty
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  Breast cancer screening of underserved women in the USA: results from the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 1998-2012.

Authors:  David H Howard; Florence K L Tangka; Janet Royalty; Lucinda P Dalzell; Jacqueline Miller; Brett O'Hara; Kristy Joseph; Kristy Kenney; Gery Guy; Ingrid J Hall
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 2.506

4.  Prevalence and correlates of false-positive results after 3-D screening mammography among uninsured women in a community outreach program.

Authors:  Rasmi G Nair; Simon J Craddock Lee; Hong Zhu; Firouzeh K Arjmandi; Emily Berry; Keith E Argenbright; Jasmin A Tiro; Celette Sugg Skinner
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2022-04-05

5.  Breast cancer screening outcomes among Mexican-origin Hispanic women participating in a breast cancer screening program.

Authors:  Stella Winters; Adam Alomari; Gurjeet Shokar; Charmaine Martin; Alok Dwivedi; Navkiran K Shokar
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2021-09-20

6.  99mTc-HYNIC-(tricine/EDDA)-FROP peptide for MCF-7 breast tumor targeting and imaging.

Authors:  Sajjad Ahmadpour; Zohreh Noaparast; Seyed Mohammad Abedi; Seyed Jalal Hosseinimehr
Journal:  J Biomed Sci       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 8.410

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.