Literature DB >> 25808671

Comparison of robotic approach, laparoscopic approach and laparotomy in treating epithelial ovarian cancer.

Ching-Hui Chen1,2, Li-Hsuan Chiu1, Huang-Hui Chen1, Cindy Chan1, Wei-Min Liu1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of robotic surgery and compare its surgical outcomes with those of laparoscopic surgery and laparotomy, with regard to performing staging surgery to manage ovarian cancer.
METHODS: One hundred and thirty-eight women who received surgical staging procedures for treatment of stage IA-IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer and borderline tumours were retrospectively included in the study. All enrolled cases were reviewed for patient demographics, peri-operative parameters, complications and survival.
RESULTS: The operation time and blood loss was significantly reduced in the robotic and laparoscopic groups. Moreover, robotic surgery was associated with decreased postoperative pain score. The length of hospital stay and time to full diet resumption were also shortened for those who underwent robotic and laparoscopic procedures. Survival analysis and complication rates were similar between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Robotic surgery is a feasible alternative in managing ovarian cancer as long as there is careful consideration given to patient selection.
Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ovarian cancer; robotic surgery; surgical staging

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25808671     DOI: 10.1002/rcs.1655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Robot        ISSN: 1478-5951            Impact factor:   2.547


  5 in total

1.  Interval robotic cytoreduction following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Sarah A Ackroyd; Sajeena Thomas; Cynthia Angel; Richard Moore; Philip J Meacham; Brent DuBeshter
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-06-19

Review 2.  Robotic surgery in gynecology.

Authors:  Ibrahim Alkatout; Liselotte Mettler; Nicolai Maass; Johannes Ackermann
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2016-12-01

3.  Comparison of efficacy of robotic surgery, laparoscopy, and laparotomy in the treatment of ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Can Shi; Yingchun Gao; Yijun Yang; Lei Zhang; Juanpeng Yu; Ting Zhang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 2.754

4.  Complication reports for robotic surgery using three arms by a single surgeon at a single institution.

Authors:  Ching-Hui Chen; Huang-Hui Chen; Wei-Min Liu
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.407

5.  Survey of current practices and opinions of German Society of Gynecologic Endoscopy members regarding the treatment of ovarian neoplasia by robotic surgery.

Authors:  J S M Zimmermann; J C Radosa; M P Radosa; P Sklavounos; P A Schweitzer; E F Solomayer
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 2.344

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.