| Literature DB >> 25808415 |
Esther Guillaume1, Erica Baranski1, Elysia Todd1, Brock Bastian2, Igor Bronin3, Christina Ivanova3, Joey T Cheng4, François S de Kock5, Jaap J A Denissen6, David Gallardo-Pujol7, Peter Halama8, Gyuseog Q Han9, Jaechang Bae9, Jungsoon Moon9, Ryan Y Hong10, Martina Hřebíčková11, Sylvie Graf11, Paweł Izdebski12, Lars Lundmann13, Lars Penke14, Marco Perugini15, Giulio Costantini15, John Rauthmann16, Matthias Ziegler16, Anu Realo17, Liisalotte Elme17, Tatsuya Sato18, Shizuka Kawamoto18, Piotr Szarota19, Jessica L Tracy20, Marcel A G van Aken21, Yu Yang22, David C Funder1.
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to quantitatively compare everyday situational experience around the world. Local collaborators recruited 5,447 members of college communities in 20 countries, who provided data via a Web site in 14 languages. Using the 89 items of the Riverside Situational Q-sort (RSQ), participants described the situation they experienced the previous evening at 7:00 p.m. Correlations among the average situational profiles of each country ranged from r = .73 to r = .95; the typical situation was described as largely pleasant. Most similar were the United States/Canada; least similar were South Korea/Denmark. Japan had the most homogenous situational experience; South Korea, the least. The 15 RSQ items varying the most across countries described relatively negative aspects of situational experience; the 15 least varying items were more positive. Further analyses correlated RSQ items with national scores on six value dimensions, the Big Five traits, economic output, and population. Individualism, Neuroticism, Openness, and Gross Domestic Product yielded more significant correlations than expected by chance. Psychological research traditionally has paid more attention to the assessment of persons than of situations, a discrepancy that extends to cross-cultural psychology. The present study demonstrates how cultures vary in situational experience in psychologically meaningful ways.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25808415 DOI: 10.1111/jopy.12176
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Pers ISSN: 0022-3506