Literature DB >> 2580831

Modulation of apolipoprotein B antigenic determinants in human low density lipoprotein subclasses.

B Teng, A Sniderman, R M Krauss, P O Kwiterovich, R W Milne, Y L Marcel.   

Abstract

To investigate the effect of low density lipoprotein (LDL) heterogeneity on the conformation of LDL apolipoprotein B (apo-B), the immunoreactivities of 6 monoclonal antibodies against LDL apo-B were measured in 3 LDL subfractions isolated by equilibrium density gradient ultracentrifugation. To ensure a broad range of LDL particles, the LDL subfractions were prepared from normal subjects and patients with hyperapobetalipoproteinemia. With 3 of the antibodies, 1D1, 5E11, and 3A10, LDL fractions 1 (the most buoyant), 2 (the intermediate), and 3 (the densest) were equally immunoreactive and competed similarly with reference whole LDL. In contrast, with 3 other antibodies, 2D8, 3F5, and 4G3, fraction 1 was significantly more reactive than fraction 3; that is for each in turn, 290, 250, and 150% more of the densest LDL protein was required to achieve the same displacement as with fraction 1. Further, the immunoreactivities of the 3 LDL fractions with antibodies 2D8, 3F5, and 4G3 were negatively correlated with their LDL cholesterol to LDL protein ratio with r values of 0.727, 0.898, and 0.870, respectively, suggesting that as LDL particle size decreases, the conformation of the LDL apo-B changes progressively. It is of interest that the antigenic determinants recognized by 3F5 and 4G3 are close to the LDL receptor recognition site on LDL apo-B. Therefore, it is possible that the reduced immunoreactivity of these determinants in dense LDL may be the in vitro correlate of the reduced fractional catabolics rate of dense LDL compared to buoyant LDL previously observed in vivo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 2580831

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  8 in total

1.  Apolipoprotein B versus lipoprotein lipids: vital lessons from the AFCAPS/TexCAPS trial.

Authors:  A D Sniderman; J Bergeron; J Frohlich
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-01-09       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Three-fold effect of lovastatin treatment on low density lipoprotein metabolism in subjects with hyperlipidemia: increase in receptor activity, decrease in apoB production, and decrease in particle affinity for the receptor. Results from a novel triple-tracer approach.

Authors:  L Berglund; J L Witztum; N F Galeano; A S Khouw; H N Ginsberg; R Ramakrishnan
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 5.922

3.  Reduced beta-strand content in apoprotein B-100 in smaller and denser low-density lipoprotein subclasses as probed by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  F Tanfani; T Galeazzi; G Curatola; E Bertoli; G Ferretti
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1997-03-15       Impact factor: 3.857

4.  Metabolic basis of hyperapobetalipoproteinemia. Turnover of apolipoprotein B in low density lipoprotein and its precursors and subfractions compared with normal and familial hypercholesterolemia.

Authors:  B Teng; A D Sniderman; A K Soutar; G R Thompson
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 14.808

5.  Characterization of the structure of polydisperse human low-density lipoprotein by neutron scattering.

Authors:  D F Meyer; A S Nealis; K R Bruckdorfer; S J Perkins
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1995-09-01       Impact factor: 3.857

6.  Measurement of apolipoprotein B in various cell lines: correlation between intracellular levels and rates of secretion.

Authors:  A Bakillah; Z Zhou; J Luchoomun; M M Hussain
Journal:  Lipids       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.880

7.  Significance of small dense low-density lipoprotein as a risk factor for coronary artery disease and acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  Sung Woo Kwon; Se-Jung Yoon; Tae Soo Kang; Hyuck Moon Kwon; Jeong-Ho Kim; Jihyuk Rhee; Sung-Ju Lee; Jong-Kwan Park; Jae Yun Lim; Young Won Yoon; Bum Kee Hong
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 2.759

8.  Molecular structure of low density lipoprotein: current status and future challenges.

Authors:  Ruth Prassl; Peter Laggner
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 1.733

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.