Literature DB >> 25808250

Risk of cancer among children with birth defects: a novel approach.

Somer Dawson1, Adrian K Charles, Carol Bower, Nicholas H de Klerk, Elizabeth Milne.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Associations between birth defects (BDs) and childhood cancers have been studied previously and have identified several specific birth defect-cancer associations. No studies have examined the risk after exclusion of known associations.
METHODS: We analyzed data from high-quality population-based registers of BDs and cancers for Western Australian births 1982 to 2007. The cohort comprised 641,036 babies still alive at 90 days. Two experts independently reviewed all 120 births with a BD and a cancer to determine whether the cancer was congenital, caused by the BD, known to be associated with the BD or otherwise. These categories were used in sensitivity analyses. Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for any cancer and specific cancers associated with any BD and specific BDs.
RESULTS: The HR for any cancer among children with any BD was 1.96 (95% confidence interval, 1.59-2.43). The HR for any cancer among children with a BD not known to be related to a cancer (n = 57) was 1.19 (95% confidence interval, 0.91-1.56). The HR for the latter association among children diagnosed with cancer before 5 years of age was 1.74 (95% confidence interval, 1.28-2.37).
CONCLUSION: This novel approach aimed to prevent inflated HRs arising from reverse causation, and allow identification of associations beyond those already well documented. Larger studies using this method are needed to explore currently undocumented associations between BDs and cancers.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  birth defects; cancer; children; cohort study; data linkage

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25808250     DOI: 10.1002/bdra.23364

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol        ISSN: 1542-0752


  6 in total

Review 1.  Pediatric cancer risk in association with birth defects: A systematic review.

Authors:  Kimberly J Johnson; Jong Min Lee; Kazi Ahsan; Hannah Padda; Qianxi Feng; Sonia Partap; Susan A Fowler; Todd E Druley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Childhood cancer in children with congenital anomalies in Oklahoma, 1997 to 2009.

Authors:  Amanda E Janitz; Barbara R Neas; Janis E Campbell; Anne E Pate; Julie A Stoner; Sheryl L Magzamen; Jennifer D Peck
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2016-03-04

3.  Maternal and Birth Characteristics and Childhood Embryonal Solid Tumors: A Population-Based Report from Brazil.

Authors:  Neimar de Paula Silva; Rejane de Souza Reis; Rafael Garcia Cunha; Júlio Fernando Pinto Oliveira; Marceli de Oliveira Santos; Maria S Pombo-de-Oliveira; Beatriz de Camargo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Congenital neurodevelopmental anomalies in pediatric and young adult cancer.

Authors:  Jeannette R Wong-Siegel; Kimberly J Johnson; Katie Gettinger; Nicole Cousins; Nicole McAmis; Ashley Zamarione; Todd E Druley
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 2.802

5.  Cancer risk in individuals with major birth defects: large Nordic population based case-control study among children, adolescents, and adults.

Authors:  Dagrun Slettebø Daltveit; Kari Klungsøyr; Anders Engeland; Anders Ekbom; Mika Gissler; Ingrid Glimelius; Tom Grotmol; Laura Madanat-Harjuoja; Anne Gulbech Ording; Solbjørg Makalani Myrtveit Sæther; Henrik Toft Sørensen; Rebecca Troisi; Tone Bjørge
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2020-12-02

6.  The relationship between congenital heart disease and cancer in Swedish children: A population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Christina-Evmorfia Kampitsi; Hanna Mogensen; Maria Feychting; Giorgio Tettamanti
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 11.069

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.