Literature DB >> 25808212

Borderline personality pathology in young people at ultra high risk of developing a psychotic disorder.

Jaymee Ryan1, Anne Graham1, Barnaby Nelson2, Alison Yung2,3.   

Abstract

AIM: The association between borderline personality disorder and the ultra high risk (UHR) for psychosis state is unclear. The following study aimed to investigate the type of attenuated psychotic symptoms and prevalence of borderline personality pathology in a sample of UHR young people. Additionally, the study aimed to explore whether borderline personality pathology influenced the transition rate to psychosis.
METHODS: Medical records from Orygen Youth Health between 2007 and 2009 were examined. There were 180 patients who met UHR criteria and were included for analysis. Most patients were females (62.8%) and age ranged from 15 to 24 years.
RESULTS: A quarter (25.2%) of UHR patients endorsed items consistent with borderline personality pathology. UHR patients with borderline personality pathology experienced a range of attenuated psychotic symptoms and could not be statistically differentiated from UHR patients with less significant or without borderline personality pathology. Borderline personality pathology did not increase or decrease the risk of developing a psychotic disorder. The absence of depression was the only predictor of psychosis.
CONCLUSIONS: Many UHR patients present with concurrent borderline personality features. The psychotic experiences reported by UHR patients with borderline personality features were not limited to paranoid ideation, supporting the idea that borderline personality disorder may include a wider range of psychotic symptoms than previously thought. It is further possible that the psychotic symptoms experienced in this group could also be indicative of an emerging psychotic disorder.
© 2015 Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adolescent; borderline personality disorder; personality disorder; psychotic disorder; schizophrenia

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25808212     DOI: 10.1111/eip.12236

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Early Interv Psychiatry        ISSN: 1751-7885            Impact factor:   2.732


  6 in total

Review 1.  Hallucinations and Other Psychotic Symptoms in Patients with Borderline Personality Disorder.

Authors:  Kamila Belohradova Minarikova; Jan Prasko; Michaela Holubova; Jakub Vanek; Krystof Kantor; Milos Slepecky; Klara Latalova; Marie Ociskova
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 2.570

2.  Comorbid Personality Disorders in Individuals With an At-Risk Mental State for Psychosis: A Meta-Analytic Review.

Authors:  Tommaso Boldrini; Annalisa Tanzilli; Maria Pontillo; Antonio Chirumbolo; Stefano Vicari; Vittorio Lingiardi
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 4.157

3.  Psychotic-Like Experiences and Nonsuicidal Self-Injury in England: Results from a National Survey [corrected].

Authors:  Ai Koyanagi; Andrew Stickley; Josep Maria Haro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Discharge pathways and relapse following treatment from early intervention in psychosis services.

Authors:  Stephen Puntis; Jason Oke; Belinda Lennox
Journal:  BJPsych Open       Date:  2018-08-30

5.  Borderline Personality Pathology in an At Risk Mental State Sample.

Authors:  Tobias Paust; Anastasia Theodoridou; Mario Müller; Christine Wyss; Caitriona Obermann; Wulf Rössler; Karsten Heekeren
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 4.157

6.  Clinical outcomes in individuals at clinical high risk of psychosis who do not transition to psychosis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gonzalo Salazar de Pablo; Livia Soardo; Anna Cabras; Joana Pereira; Simi Kaur; Filippo Besana; Vincenzo Arienti; Francesco Coronelli; Jae Il Shin; Marco Solmi; Natalia Petros; Andre F Carvalho; Philip McGuire; Paolo Fusar-Poli
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 6.892

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.