Literature DB >> 25808200

Exploring educational disparities in risk of preterm delivery: a comparative study of 12 European birth cohorts.

Gry Poulsen1, Katrine Strandberg-Larsen, Laust Mortensen, Henrique Barros, Sylvaine Cordier, Sofia Correia, Asta Danileviciute, Manon van Eijsden, Ana Fernández-Somoano, Ulrike Gehring, Regina Grazuleviciene, Esther Hafkamp-de Groen, Tine Brink Henriksen, Morten Søndergaard Jensen, Isabel Larrañaga, Per Magnus, Kate Pickett, Hein Raat, Lorenzo Richiardi, Florence Rouget, Franca Rusconi, Camilla Stoltenberg, Eleonora P Uphoff, Tanja G M Vrijkotte, Alet H Wijga, Martine Vrijheid, Merete Osler, Anne-Marie Nybo Andersen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An association between education and preterm delivery has been observed in populations across Europe, but differences in methodology limit comparability. We performed a direct cross-cohort comparison of educational disparities in preterm delivery based on individual-level birth cohort data.
METHODS: The study included data from 12 European cohorts from Denmark, England, France, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Norway, Italy, Portugal, and Spain. The cohorts included between 2434 and 99 655 pregnancies. The association between maternal education and preterm delivery (22-36 completed weeks of gestation) was reported as risk ratios, risk differences, and slope indexes of inequality with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS: Singleton preterm live delivery proportion varied between 3.7% and 7.5%. There were large variations between the cohorts in the distribution of education and maternal characteristics. Nevertheless, there were similar educational differences in risk of preterm delivery in 8 of the 12 cohorts with slope index of inequality varying between 2.2 [95% CI 1.1, 3.3] and 4.0 [95% CI 1.4, 6.6] excess preterm deliveries per 100 singleton deliveries among the educationally most disadvantaged, and risk ratio between the lowest and highest education category varying from 1.4 [95% CI 1.1, 1.8] to 1.9 [95% CI 1.2, 3.1]. No associations were found in the last four cohorts.
CONCLUSIONS: Educational disparities in preterm delivery were found all over Europe. Despite differences in the distributions of education and preterm delivery, the results were remarkably similar across the cohorts. For those few cohorts that did not follow the pattern, study and country characteristics did not explain the differences.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  European pregnancy birth cohort; Health inequalities; cross-cohort collaboration; educational inequalities; preterm birth

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25808200     DOI: 10.1111/ppe.12185

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol        ISSN: 0269-5022            Impact factor:   3.980


  15 in total

1.  Incidence, risk factors and consequences of preterm birth - findings from a multi-centric observational study for 14 months in Nepal.

Authors:  Abhishek Gurung; Johan Wrammert; Avinash K Sunny; Rejina Gurung; Netra Rana; Yuba Nidhi Basaula; Prajwal Paudel; Amrit Pokhrel; Ashish Kc
Journal:  Arch Public Health       Date:  2020-07-17

2.  Internet-Based Birth-Cohort Studies: Is This the Future for Epidemiology?

Authors:  Ridvan Firestone; Soo Cheng; Neil Pearce; Jeroen Douwes; Franco Merletti; Costanza Pizzi; Emanuele Pivetta; Franca Rusconi; Lorenzo Richiardi
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2015-06-12

3.  Preterm Birth Affects the Risk of Developing Immune-Mediated Diseases.

Authors:  Sybelle Goedicke-Fritz; Christoph Härtel; Gabriela Krasteva-Christ; Matthias V Kopp; Sascha Meyer; Michael Zemlin
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 7.561

4.  Social inequalities in the provision of obstetric services in Norway 1967-2009: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Helene Sofie Eriksen; Susanne Høy; Lorentz M Irgens; Svein Rasmussen; Kjell Haug
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.367

5.  An Italian Network of Population-Based Birth Cohorts to Evaluate Social and Environmental Risk Factors on Pregnancy Outcomes: The LEAP Study.

Authors:  Teresa Spadea; Barbara Pacelli; Andrea Ranzi; Claudia Galassi; Raffaella Rusciani; Moreno Demaria; Nicola Caranci; Paola Michelozzi; Francesco Cerza; Marina Davoli; Francesco Forastiere; Giulia Cesaroni
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Effect of socioeconomic status on psychosocial problems in 5- to 6-year-old preterm- and term-born children: the ABCD study.

Authors:  Sanne A A de Laat; Marie-Louise Essink-Bot; Aleid G van Wassenaer-Leemhuis; Tanja G Vrijkotte
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 4.785

7.  Cohort profile: cerebral palsy in the Norwegian and Danish birth cohorts (MOBAND-CP).

Authors:  Mette C Tollånes; Katrine Strandberg-Larsen; Ingeborg Forthun; Tanja Gram Petersen; Dag Moster; Anne-Marie Nybo Andersen; Camilla Stoltenberg; Jørn Olsen; Allen J Wilcox
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Socioeconomic inequalities in stillbirth rates in Europe: measuring the gap using routine data from the Euro-Peristat Project.

Authors:  Jennifer Zeitlin; Laust Mortensen; Caroline Prunet; Alison Macfarlane; Ashna D Hindori-Mohangoo; Mika Gissler; Katarzyna Szamotulska; Karin van der Pal; Francisco Bolumar; Anne-Marie Nybo Andersen; Helga Sól Ólafsdóttir; Wei-Hong Zhang; Béatrice Blondel; Sophie Alexander
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Are risk factors for preterm and early-term live singleton birth the same? A population-based study in France.

Authors:  Marie Delnord; Béatrice Blondel; Caroline Prunet; Jennifer Zeitlin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Information bias of social gradients in sickness absence: a comparison of self-report data in the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study (MoBa) and data in national registries.

Authors:  Petter Kristensen; Karina Corbett; Ferdinand A Mohn; Therese N Hanvold; Ingrid S Mehlum
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.