Eva V E Madsen1, Kim C Aalders2, Margriet van der Heiden-van der Loo3, Paul D Gobardhan4, Poultje M P van Oort2, Fred W van der Ent5, Emiel J T Rutgers1, Renato A Valdés Olmes6, Sjoerd G Elias7, Thijs van Dalen8. 1. Department of Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 3. Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Surgery, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands. 5. Department of Surgery, Orbis Medical Center, Sittard, The Netherlands. 6. Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 7. Department of Clinical Epidemiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. 8. Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, The Netherlands. tvdalen@diakhuis.nl.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The introduction of the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in breast cancer has renewed interest in lymphatic drainage to the internal mammary (IM) nodes. The clinical impact of tumor positive IM nodes is not completely clear. This study evaluated the incidence and impact on overall survival of metastatic IM SLNs. METHODS: Between 1997 and 2010, 3685 patients underwent surgery including SLNB for primary breast cancer following an intratumoral or peritumoral radioactive-tracer injection. The presence of lymph node metastases was categorized according to the TNM-classification. Cumulative overall survival was estimated and the influence of metastases in the IM nodes and other factors was assessed by Cox-regression-analysis. RESULTS: In 754 patients (20.5 %) ipsilateral IM lymph nodes were visualized on preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, retrieval rate of IM SLNs was 81.0 %. IM metastases were detected in 130 patients (21.3 % of retrieved SLNs and 3.5 % of all patients respectively). The presence of IM metastases was associated with axillary metastases (p < 0.001). After a median follow-up of 61.2 months, 10.9 % of patients had died. In a multivariate analysis IM metastases did not have a significant effect on overall survival [HR] 1.20; CI: 0.73-1.98. In patients without axillary metastases (n = 2398), the presence of IM metastases (n = 43) was associated with worse survival [HR] 2.68; 95 % CI: 1.30-5.54. CONCLUSION: Overall, the presence of IM metastases did not effect overall survival independent of other prognostic factors including axillary metastases. However, the small subgroup of patients who had IM metastases alone had worse outcome than patients without any regional lymph node metastases.
INTRODUCTION: The introduction of the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in breast cancer has renewed interest in lymphatic drainage to the internal mammary (IM) nodes. The clinical impact of tumor positive IM nodes is not completely clear. This study evaluated the incidence and impact on overall survival of metastatic IM SLNs. METHODS: Between 1997 and 2010, 3685 patients underwent surgery including SLNB for primary breast cancer following an intratumoral or peritumoral radioactive-tracer injection. The presence of lymph node metastases was categorized according to the TNM-classification. Cumulative overall survival was estimated and the influence of metastases in the IM nodes and other factors was assessed by Cox-regression-analysis. RESULTS: In 754 patients (20.5 %) ipsilateral IM lymph nodes were visualized on preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, retrieval rate of IM SLNs was 81.0 %. IM metastases were detected in 130 patients (21.3 % of retrieved SLNs and 3.5 % of all patients respectively). The presence of IM metastases was associated with axillary metastases (p < 0.001). After a median follow-up of 61.2 months, 10.9 % of patients had died. In a multivariate analysis IM metastases did not have a significant effect on overall survival [HR] 1.20; CI: 0.73-1.98. In patients without axillary metastases (n = 2398), the presence of IM metastases (n = 43) was associated with worse survival [HR] 2.68; 95 % CI: 1.30-5.54. CONCLUSION: Overall, the presence of IM metastases did not effect overall survival independent of other prognostic factors including axillary metastases. However, the small subgroup of patients who had IM metastases alone had worse outcome than patients without any regional lymph node metastases.
Authors: Haeyoung Kim; Yeon Jeong Kim; Donghyun Park; Woong-Yang Park; Doo Ho Choi; Won Park; Won Kyung Cho; Nalee Kim Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2021-06-21 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Pablo Borrelli; Maarten L Donswijk; Marcel P Stokkel; Suzana C Teixeira; Harm van Tinteren; Emiel J Th Rutgers; Renato A Valdés Olmos Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2016-10-27 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: V Habraken; T J A van Nijnatten; L de Munck; M Moossdorff; E M Heuts; M B I Lobbes; M L Smidt Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2016-12-03 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Alfredo Carlos S D Barros; Lincon Jo Mori; Dolores Nishimura; Alfredo L Jacomo Journal: World J Surg Oncol Date: 2016-04-30 Impact factor: 2.754