Nikolaos G Frangogiannis1. 1. Wilf Family Cardiovascular Research Institute, Department of Medicine (Cardiology), Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cardiomyocyte necrosis activates an inflammatory response that serves to clear the injured myocardium from dead cells, and stimulates repair, but may also extend injury. This manuscript discusses new findings that advanced our understanding of the role of inflammation in cardiac injury and repair. RECENT FINDINGS: Recently published studies have identified interleukin-1α and RNA released by necrotic cardiomyocytes as key danger signals that trigger the inflammatory response following infarction. Interleukin-1 promotes activation of a proinflammatory phenotype in leukocytes and fibroblasts, and delays myofibroblast transdifferentiation. Inhibitory lymphocytes play a crucial role in negative regulation of the postinfarction inflammatory response by modulating macrophage and fibroblast phenotype. Cardiac macrophages exhibit significant heterogeneity and phenotypic plasticity and may orchestrate the reparative response following infarction. In neonatal mice, resident embryonic macrophage subpopulations may promote a regenerative response. In contrast, in adult animals replacement of resident macrophage populations with monocyte-derived macrophages may induce inflammation while inhibiting cardiac regeneration. These exciting observations highlight the crucial role of macrophages in cardiac injury and repair, but should be interpreted with caution considering the limitations of murine models of neonatal myocardial injury. SUMMARY: Design of novel strategies to reduce cardiac injury, improve repair and promote regeneration is dependent on understanding of the cell biology of the inflammatory response.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cardiomyocyte necrosis activates an inflammatory response that serves to clear the injured myocardium from dead cells, and stimulates repair, but may also extend injury. This manuscript discusses new findings that advanced our understanding of the role of inflammation in cardiac injury and repair. RECENT FINDINGS: Recently published studies have identified interleukin-1α and RNA released by necrotic cardiomyocytes as key danger signals that trigger the inflammatory response following infarction. Interleukin-1 promotes activation of a proinflammatory phenotype in leukocytes and fibroblasts, and delays myofibroblast transdifferentiation. Inhibitory lymphocytes play a crucial role in negative regulation of the postinfarction inflammatory response by modulating macrophage and fibroblast phenotype. Cardiac macrophages exhibit significant heterogeneity and phenotypic plasticity and may orchestrate the reparative response following infarction. In neonatal mice, resident embryonic macrophage subpopulations may promote a regenerative response. In contrast, in adult animals replacement of resident macrophage populations with monocyte-derived macrophages may induce inflammation while inhibiting cardiac regeneration. These exciting observations highlight the crucial role of macrophages in cardiac injury and repair, but should be interpreted with caution considering the limitations of murine models of neonatal myocardial injury. SUMMARY: Design of novel strategies to reduce cardiac injury, improve repair and promote regeneration is dependent on understanding of the cell biology of the inflammatory response.
Authors: Antonio Abbate; Benjamin Wallace Van Tassell; Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai; Michael Christopher Kontos; John Dallas Grizzard; Debra Whittaker Spillman; Claudia Oddi; Charlotte Susan Roberts; Ryan David Melchior; George Herman Mueller; Nayef Antar Abouzaki; Lenore Rosemary Rengel; Amit Varma; Michael Lucas Gambill; Raquel Appa Falcao; Norbert Felix Voelkel; Charles Anthony Dinarello; George Wayne Vetrovec Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2013-02-27 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Maulik D Majmudar; Edmund J Keliher; Timo Heidt; Florian Leuschner; Jessica Truelove; Brena F Sena; Rostic Gorbatov; Yoshiko Iwamoto; Partha Dutta; Gregory Wojtkiewicz; Gabriel Courties; Matt Sebas; Anna Borodovsky; Kevin Fitzgerald; Marc W Nolte; Gerhard Dickneite; John W Chen; Daniel G Anderson; Filip K Swirski; Ralph Weissleder; Matthias Nahrendorf Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-04-24 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Marcin Dobaczewski; Ying Xia; Marcin Bujak; Carlos Gonzalez-Quesada; Nikolaos G Frangogiannis Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2010-04-09 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Alexander R Pinto; Rosa Paolicelli; Ekaterina Salimova; Janko Gospocic; Esfir Slonimsky; Daniel Bilbao-Cortes; James W Godwin; Nadia A Rosenthal Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-05-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Annet Kirabo; Sergey Ryzhov; Manisha Gupte; Seng Sengsayadeth; Richard J Gumina; Douglas B Sawyer; Cristi L Galindo Journal: J Mol Cell Cardiol Date: 2017-03-03 Impact factor: 5.000
Authors: Marcin Wysoczynski; Asif Pathan; Joseph B Moore; Talha Farid; Jae Kim; Marjan Nasr; Yi Kang; Hong Li; Roberto Bolli Journal: Stem Cell Rev Rep Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 5.739
Authors: Tengfang Li; Zhongqiang Zhang; Joe G Bartolacci; Gaelen K Dwyer; Quan Liu; Lisa R Mathews; Murugesan Velayutham; Anna S Roessing; Yoojin C Lee; Helong Dai; Sruti Shiva; Martin H Oberbarnscheidt; Jenna L Dziki; Steven J Mullet; Stacy G Wendell; James D Wilkinson; Steven A Webber; Michelle Wood-Trageser; Simon C Watkins; Anthony J Demetris; George S Hussey; Stephen F Badylak; Hēth R Turnquist Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2020-10-01 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Min Zhu; Sean C Goetsch; Zhaoning Wang; Robert Luo; Joseph A Hill; Jay Schneider; Sidney M Morris; Zhi-Ping Liu Journal: Circ Res Date: 2015-10-05 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Mira Jung; Yonggang Ma; Rugmani Padmanabhan Iyer; Kristine Y DeLeon-Pennell; Andriy Yabluchanskiy; Michael R Garrett; Merry L Lindsey Journal: Basic Res Cardiol Date: 2017-04-24 Impact factor: 17.165