Literature DB >> 25807218

Assessing cutoff values for increased exercise blood pressure to predict incident hypertension in a general population.

Roberto Lorbeer1, Till Ittermann, Henry Völzke, Sven Gläser, Ralf Ewert, Stephan B Felix, Marcus Dörr.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Cutoff values for increased exercise blood pressure (BP) are not established in hypertension guidelines. The aim of the study was to assess optimal cutoff values for increased exercise BP to predict incident hypertension.
METHODS: Data of 661 normotensive participants (386 women) aged 25-77 years from the Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP-1) with a 5-year follow-up were used. Exercise BP was measured at a submaximal level of 100 W and at maximum level of a symptom-limited cycle ergometry test. Cutoff values for increased exercise BP were defined at the maximum sum of sensitivity and specificity for the prediction of incident hypertension. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) and net reclassification index (NRI) were calculated to investigate whether increased exercise BP adds predictive value for incident hypertension beyond established cardiovascular risk factors.
RESULTS: In men, values of 160  mmHg (100  W level; AUC = 0.7837; NRI = 0.534, P < 0.001) and 210  mmHg (maximum level; AUC = 0.7677; NRI = 0.340, P = 0.003) were detected as optimal cutoff values for the definition of increased exercise SBP. A value of 190  mmHg (AUC = 0.8347; NRI = 0.519, P < 0.001) showed relevance for the definition of increased exercise SBP in women at the maximum level.
CONCLUSION: According to our analyses, 190 and 210  mmHg are clinically relevant cutoff values for increased exercise SBP at the maximum exercise level of cycle ergometry test for women and men, respectively. In addition, for men, our analyses provided a cutoff value of 160  mmHg for increased exercise SBP at the 100  W level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25807218     DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000568

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


  4 in total

Review 1.  Blood Pressure Response to Exercise and Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Martin G Schultz; Andre La Gerche; James E Sharman
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 5.369

2.  S100 calcium binding protein A6 and associated long noncoding ribonucleic acids as biomarkers in the diagnosis and staging of primary biliary cholangitis.

Authors:  Xi-Hua Dong; Di Dai; Zhi-Dong Yang; Xiao-Ou Yu; Hua Li; Hui Kang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Comparison of manual and automated auscultatory blood pressure during graded exercise among people with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Myles N Moore; Dean S Picone; Michele L Callisaya; Velandai Srikanth; James E Sharman; Martin G Schultz
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 4.  The Identification and Management of High Blood Pressure Using Exercise Blood Pressure: Current Evidence and Practical Guidance.

Authors:  Martin G Schultz; Katharine D Currie; Kristofer Hedman; Rachel E Climie; Andrew Maiorana; Jeff S Coombes; James E Sharman
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.