Literature DB >> 25807030

Block vs. Weekly Undulating Periodized Resistance Training Programs in Women.

Sandro Bartolomei1, Jeffrey R Stout, David H Fukuda, Jay R Hoffman, Franco Merni.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of resistance training using block periodization (BP) and weekly undulating (WUD) model on maximal strength and hypertrophy in recreationally strength trained women. Seventeen recreationally trained women were randomly assigned to either a BP group (n = 9; age = 24.7 ± 4.2 years; body mass = 62.1 ± 5.3 kg; height = 166.4 ± 6.0 cm) or a WUD group (n = 8; age = 23.2 ± 2.2 years; body mass = 59.8 ± 11.9 kg; height = 160.1 ± 4.1 cm). Participants of both groups trained 3 days a week for 10 weeks. The BP and WUD programs used the same exercises, and the difference between the 2 programs was in the distribution of the training volume within each training phase. Anthropometric measures and strength testing were performed before (PRE) and after 10 weeks (POST) of training. The results revealed that both BP and WUD groups made significant increases in strength and power, but improvements in lower-body strength were significantly (p = 0.039) greater in the WUD group (+27.7%) compared with the BP group (+15.2%). Both groups significantly increased arm muscle hypertrophy (p < 0.001), whereas improvements in thigh muscle size were significant in the WUD group only (+5.8%, p = 0.001). Results of this study indicate that the WUD model is more effective than the BP model for increasing maximal strength and muscle size in the lower body in women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25807030     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000948

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  6 in total

1.  CURRENT CONCEPTS IN PERIODIZATION OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING FOR THE SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPIST.

Authors:  Daniel Lorenz; Scot Morrison
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2015-11

Review 2.  Periodization: Variation in the Definition and Discrepancies in Study Design.

Authors:  Ryo Kataoka; Ecaterina Vasenina; Jeremy Loenneke; Samuel L Buckner
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 3.  Is Empirical Research on Periodization Trustworthy? A Comprehensive Review of Conceptual and Methodological Issues.

Authors:  José Afonso; Pantelis T Nikolaidis; Patrícia Sousa; Isabel Mesquita
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  Reproducibility and Applicability of Traditional Strength Training Prescription Recommendations.

Authors:  Juan Ramón Heredia-Elvar; Juan Hernández-Lougedo; Luis Maicas-Pérez; Raúl Notario-Alonso; Manuel Vicente Garnacho-Castaño; Pablo García-Fernández; José Luis Maté-Muñoz
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-02

5.  Effects of Periodization on Strength and Muscle Hypertrophy in Volume-Equated Resistance Training Programs: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lukas Moesgaard; Mikkel Malling Beck; Lasse Christiansen; Per Aagaard; Jesper Lundbye-Jensen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 11.928

6.  Periodized resistance training for persistent non-specific low back pain: a mixed methods feasibility study.

Authors:  Svein O Tjøsvoll; Paul J Mork; Vegard M Iversen; Marit B Rise; Marius S Fimland
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-05-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.