Jennifer M Pynn1, Elvira Parravicini2, Lisa Saiman2, David A Bateman2, Jonathan M Barasch3, John M Lorenz2. 1. Department of Pediatrics, Stony Brook University School of Medicine, Stony Brook, New York. 2. Department of Pediatrics, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York. 3. Department of Medicine, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To assess the ability of urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (UNGAL) to discriminate between culture-positive vs. culture-negative late-onset sepsis evaluations. METHODS: This is a prospective observational study of 136 neonates who underwent ≥1 sepsis evaluation at >72 h of age. Urine was obtained at the time of sepsis evaluation to measure UNGAL concentration. Using generalized estimating equations controlling for gender, gestational and postnatal age, acute kidney injury, and within-patient correlations, pair-wise contrasts between mean log UNGAL concentrations of infants with negative sepsis evaluations vs. culture-positive sepsis and presumed sepsis were assessed. Discrimination characteristics at several UNGAL cutoff concentrations were assessed using receiver-operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: The predicted mean log UNGAL values of culture-positive sepsis and presumed sepsis vs. negative sepsis evaluations differed significantly (P < 0.001 and P = 0.02, respectively). At a cutoff ≥ 50 ng/ml, UNGAL discriminated between culture-positive sepsis and culture-negative sepsis evaluations with sensitivity = 86%, specificity = 56%, positive predictive value = 41%, negative predictive value = 92%, and number needed to treat = 3. CONCLUSION: UNGAL is a noninvasive biomarker with high negative predictive value at the time of late-onset sepsis evaluation in neonates and could be a useful adjunct to traditional components of sepsis evaluations.
BACKGROUND: To assess the ability of urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (UNGAL) to discriminate between culture-positive vs. culture-negative late-onset sepsis evaluations. METHODS: This is a prospective observational study of 136 neonates who underwent ≥1 sepsis evaluation at >72 h of age. Urine was obtained at the time of sepsis evaluation to measure UNGAL concentration. Using generalized estimating equations controlling for gender, gestational and postnatal age, acute kidney injury, and within-patient correlations, pair-wise contrasts between mean log UNGAL concentrations of infants with negative sepsis evaluations vs. culture-positive sepsis and presumed sepsis were assessed. Discrimination characteristics at several UNGAL cutoff concentrations were assessed using receiver-operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: The predicted mean log UNGAL values of culture-positive sepsis and presumed sepsis vs. negative sepsis evaluations differed significantly (P < 0.001 and P = 0.02, respectively). At a cutoff ≥ 50 ng/ml, UNGAL discriminated between culture-positive sepsis and culture-negative sepsis evaluations with sensitivity = 86%, specificity = 56%, positive predictive value = 41%, negative predictive value = 92%, and number needed to treat = 3. CONCLUSION: UNGAL is a noninvasive biomarker with high negative predictive value at the time of late-onset sepsis evaluation in neonates and could be a useful adjunct to traditional components of sepsis evaluations.
Authors: S B Brodie; K E Sands; J E Gray; R A Parker; D A Goldmann; R B Davis; D K Richardson Journal: Pediatr Infect Dis J Date: 2000-01 Impact factor: 2.129
Authors: Thomas L Nickolas; Kai M Schmidt-Ott; Pietro Canetta; Catherine Forster; Eugenia Singer; Meghan Sise; Antje Elger; Omar Maarouf; David Antonio Sola-Del Valle; Matthew O'Rourke; Evan Sherman; Peter Lee; Abdallah Geara; Philip Imus; Achuta Guddati; Allison Polland; Wasiq Rahman; Saban Elitok; Nasir Malik; James Giglio; Suzanne El-Sayegh; Prasad Devarajan; Sudarshan Hebbar; Subodh J Saggi; Barry Hahn; Ralph Kettritz; Friedrich C Luft; Jonathan Barasch Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2012-01-17 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Susan R Snyder; Alessandra M Favoretto; Rich Ann Baetz; James H Derzon; Bereneice M Madison; Diana Mass; Colleen S Shaw; Christopher D Layfield; Robert H Christenson; Edward B Liebow Journal: Clin Biochem Date: 2012-06-16 Impact factor: 3.281
Authors: Michael Bennett; Catherine L Dent; Qing Ma; Sudha Dastrala; Frank Grenier; Ryan Workman; Hina Syed; Salman Ali; Jonathan Barasch; Prasad Devarajan Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2008-03-12 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Trang K Huynh; David A Bateman; Elvira Parravicini; John M Lorenz; Sheri L Nemerofsky; Meghan E Sise; Teresa M Bowman; Elena Polesana; Jonathan M Barasch Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: Catherine L Dent; Qing Ma; Sudha Dastrala; Michael Bennett; Mark M Mitsnefes; Jonathan Barasch; Prasad Devarajan Journal: Crit Care Date: 2007 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Elvira Parravicini; Chiara Locatelli; John M Lorenz; Sheri L Nemerofsky; David A Bateman Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2016-07-13 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: Stephen J McWilliam; Daniel J Antoine; Andrea L Jorgensen; Rosalind L Smyth; Munir Pirmohamed Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-03-23 Impact factor: 4.379