Ping Wang1, Christian Schuetz, Prashanth Vallabhajosyula, Zdravka Medarova, Aseda Tena, Lingling Wei, Kazuhiko Yamada, Shaoping Deng, James F Markmann, David H Sachs, Anna Moore. 1. 1 Molecular Imaging Laboratory, MGH/MIT/HMS Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA. 2 Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. 3 Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. 4 Transplantation Biology Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Information regarding the longevity of transplanted pancreatic islet grafts could provide valuable information for treatment options. In our previous studies, we showed that isolated autologous pancreatic islets could be labeled with iron oxide nanoparticles and monitored after transplantation using MRI. Here, we report on in vivo monitoring of a secondary damage that occurs at the later stages because of allogeneic immune rejection. METHODS: In the proof-of-principle studies, iron oxide-labeled autologous pancreatic islets were transplanted under the renal capsules of nonhuman primates. To demonstrate acute graft loss, the animals were injected with streptozotocin. Graft monitoring was performed by in vivo MRI. Next, iron oxide-labeled allogeneic islets were transplanted into the liver and monitored by MRI after withdrawal of immunosuppression. RESULTS: In autologous model, we observed a pronounced drop in graft volume after streptozotocin challenge as assessed by MRI. In allogeneic model of islet transplantation, there was an initial islet loss after the procedure followed by relative stabilization of the graft volume. After immunosuppression was discontinued, there was a noticeable drop in graft volume that gradually continued during the course of the study. Importantly, the loss of graft volume observed on MR preceded the raise in blood glucose. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that in vivo MRI was able to reveal graft volume loss before any changes in blood glucose that can be measured by standard methods. We believe that these results could provide means for clinicians to follow islet fate noninvasively and longitudinally using clinically relevant scanners.
BACKGROUND: Information regarding the longevity of transplanted pancreatic islet grafts could provide valuable information for treatment options. In our previous studies, we showed that isolated autologous pancreatic islets could be labeled with iron oxide nanoparticles and monitored after transplantation using MRI. Here, we report on in vivo monitoring of a secondary damage that occurs at the later stages because of allogeneic immune rejection. METHODS: In the proof-of-principle studies, iron oxide-labeled autologous pancreatic islets were transplanted under the renal capsules of nonhuman primates. To demonstrate acute graft loss, the animals were injected with streptozotocin. Graft monitoring was performed by in vivo MRI. Next, iron oxide-labeled allogeneic islets were transplanted into the liver and monitored by MRI after withdrawal of immunosuppression. RESULTS: In autologous model, we observed a pronounced drop in graft volume after streptozotocin challenge as assessed by MRI. In allogeneic model of islet transplantation, there was an initial islet loss after the procedure followed by relative stabilization of the graft volume. After immunosuppression was discontinued, there was a noticeable drop in graft volume that gradually continued during the course of the study. Importantly, the loss of graft volume observed on MR preceded the raise in blood glucose. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that in vivo MRI was able to reveal graft volume loss before any changes in blood glucose that can be measured by standard methods. We believe that these results could provide means for clinicians to follow islet fate noninvasively and longitudinally using clinically relevant scanners.
Authors: Joo Ho Tai; Paula Foster; Alma Rosales; Biao Feng; Craig Hasilo; Violetta Martinez; Soha Ramadan; Jonatan Snir; C W James Melling; Savita Dhanvantari; Brian Rutt; David J G White Journal: Diabetes Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Brad P Barnett; Jesus Ruiz-Cabello; Partha Hota; Ronald Ouwerkerk; Michael J Shamblott; Cal Lauzon; Piotr Walczak; Wesley D Gilson; Vadappuram P Chacko; Dara L Kraitchman; Aravind Arepally; Jeff W M Bulte Journal: Contrast Media Mol Imaging Date: 2011 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 3.161
Authors: B P Barnett; D L Kraitchman; C Lauzon; C A Magee; P Walczak; W D Gilson; A Arepally; J W M Bulte Journal: Mol Pharm Date: 2006 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: C Toso; J-P Vallee; P Morel; F Ris; S Demuylder-Mischler; M Lepetit-Coiffe; N Marangon; F Saudek; A M James Shapiro; D Bosco; T Berney Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Volkert A L Huurman; Robert Hilbrands; Gabriëlle G M Pinkse; Pieter Gillard; Gaby Duinkerken; Pieter van de Linde; Petronella M W van der Meer-Prins; Minke F J Versteeg-van der Voort Maarschalk; Koen Verbeeck; Behrooz Z Alizadeh; Chantal Mathieu; Frans K Gorus; Dave L Roelen; Frans H J Claas; Bart Keymeulen; Daniel G Pipeleers; Bart O Roep Journal: PLoS One Date: 2008-06-18 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Muhammad Jamal Afridi; Arun Ross; Xiaoming Liu; Margaret F Bennewitz; Dorela D Shuboni; Erik M Shapiro Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2016-12-26 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Ping Wang; Patrick W Goodwill; Prachi Pandit; Jeff Gaudet; Alana Ross; Junfeng Wang; Elaine Yu; Daniel W Hensley; Timothy C Doyle; Christopher H Contag; Steven Conolly; Anna Moore Journal: Quant Imaging Med Surg Date: 2018-03
Authors: Ghulam Muhammad; Jiadi Xu; Jeff W M Bulte; Anna Jablonska; Piotr Walczak; Miroslaw Janowski Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-07-05 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Dimitri Van Simaeys; Adriana De La Fuente; Serena Zilio; Alessia Zoso; Victoria Kuznetsova; Oscar Alcazar; Peter Buchwald; Andrea Grilli; Jimmy Caroli; Silvio Bicciato; Paolo Serafini Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2022-04-05 Impact factor: 17.694
Authors: Geun Soo Kim; Jong Hyun Lee; Du Yeon Shin; Han Sin Lee; Hyojun Park; Kyo Won Lee; Heung-Mo Yang; Sung Joo Kim; Jae Berm Park Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-01-21 Impact factor: 4.379