Literature DB >> 25806399

An Anesthesia Preinduction Checklist to Improve Information Exchange, Knowledge of Critical Information, Perception of Safety, and Possibly Perception of Teamwork in Anesthesia Teams.

David W Tscholl1, Mona Weiss, Michaela Kolbe, Sven Staender, Burkhardt Seifert, Daniel Landert, Bastian Grande, Donat R Spahn, Christoph B Noethiger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An anesthesia preinduction checklist (APIC) to be performed before anesthesia induction was introduced and evaluated with respect to 5 team-level outcomes, each being a surrogate end point for patient safety: information exchange (the percentage of checklist items exchanged by a team, out of 12 total items); knowledge of critical information (the percentage of critical information items out of 5 total items such as allergies, reported as known by the members of a team); team members' perceptions of safety (the median scores given by the members of a team on a continuous rating scale); their perception of teamwork (the median scores given by the members of a team on a continuous rating scale); and clinical performance (the percentage of completed items out of 14 required tasks, e.g., suction device checked).
METHODS: A prospective interventional study comparing anesthesia teams using the APIC with a control group not using the APIC was performed using a multimethod design. Trained observers rated information exchange and clinical performance during on-site observations of anesthesia inductions. After the observations, each team member indicated the critical information items they knew and their perceptions of safety and teamwork.
RESULTS: One hundred five teams using the APIC were compared with 100 teams not doing so. The medians of the team-level outcome scores in the APIC group versus the control group were as follows: information exchange: 100% vs 33% (P < 0.001), knowledge of critical information: 100% vs 90% (P < 0.001), perception of safety: 91% vs 84% (P < 0.001), perception of teamwork: 90% vs 86% (P = 0.028), and clinical performance: 93% vs 93% (P = 0.60).
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides empirical evidence that the use of a preinduction checklist significantly improves information exchange, knowledge of critical information, and perception of safety in anesthesia teams-all parameters contributing to patient safety. There was a trend indicating improved perception of teamwork.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25806399     DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000671

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  10 in total

1.  Designing Interactive Alerts to Improve Recognition of Critical Events in Medical Emergencies.

Authors:  Angela Mastrianni; Aleksandra Sarcevic; Lauren S Chung; Issa Zakeri; Emily C Alberto; Zachary P Milestone; Randall S Burd; Ivan Marsic
Journal:  DIS (Des Interact Syst Conf)       Date:  2021-06-28

2.  Construction and validation of a nursing care protocol in anesthesia.

Authors:  Cassiane de Santana Lemos; Vanessa de Brito Poveda; Aparecida de Cassia Giane Peniche
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2017-12-11

3.  Development and Implementation of a Perianesthetic Safety Checklist in a Veterinary University Small Animal Teaching Hospital.

Authors:  Gwennaëlle Menoud; Shannon Axiak Flammer; Claudia Spadavecchia; Mathieu Raillard
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-04-03

4.  Interventions to improve team effectiveness within health care: a systematic review of the past decade.

Authors:  Martina Buljac-Samardzic; Kirti D Doekhie; Jeroen D H van Wijngaarden
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2020-01-08

5.  Impact of a semi-structured briefing on the management of adverse events in anesthesiology: a randomized pilot study.

Authors:  Christopher Neuhaus; Johannes Schäfer; Markus A Weigand; Christoph Lichtenstern
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 2.217

6.  Five-year audit of adherence to an anaesthesia pre-induction checklist.

Authors:  A Fuchs; S Frick; M Huber; T Riva; L Theiler; M Kleine-Brueggeney; T H Pedersen; J Berger-Estilita; R Greif
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 12.893

7.  How to Conduct Multimethod Field Studies in the Operating Room: The iPad Combined With a Survey App as a Valid and Reliable Data Collection Tool.

Authors:  David W Tscholl; Mona Weiss; Donat R Spahn; Christoph B Noethiger
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2016-01-05

8.  World Health Organization (WHO) surgical safety checklist implementation and its impact on perioperative morbidity and mortality in an academic medical center in Chile.

Authors:  Hector J Lacassie; Constanza Ferdinand; Sergio Guzmán; Lorena Camus; Ghislaine C Echevarria
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 9.  Situation Awareness-Oriented Patient Monitoring with Visual Patient Technology: A Qualitative Review of the Primary Research.

Authors:  David Werner Tscholl; Julian Rössler; Sadiq Said; Alexander Kaserer; Donat Rudolf Spahn; Christoph Beat Nöthiger
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Top 10 Resources in Global Surgery.

Authors:  Alliance Niyikuri; Emily R Smith; Dominique Vervoort; Mark G Shrime; Stav Brown; Alexander W Peters; Gavin Yamey; Emmanuel Makasa
Journal:  Glob Health Sci Pract       Date:  2020-09-30
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.