Literature DB >> 25806283

Concordance of IHC, FISH and RT-PCR for EML4-ALK rearrangements.

Cristina Teixidó1, Niki Karachaliou1, Vicente Peg1, Ana Gimenez-Capitan1, Rafael Rosell1.   

Abstract

The echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 anaplastic lymphoma kinase (EML4-ALK) has emerged as the second most important driver oncogene in lung cancer and the first targetable fusion oncokinase to be identified in 4-6% of lung adenocarcinomas. Crizotinib, along with a diagnostic test-the Vysis ALK Break Apart fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) Probe Kit-is approved for the treatment of ALK positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the success of a targeted drug is critically dependent on a sensitive and specific screening assay to detect the molecular drug target. In our experience, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-based detection of EML4-ALK is a more sensitive and reliable approach compared to FISH and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Although ALK FISH is clinically validated, the assay can be technically challenging and other diagnostic modalities, including IHC and RT-PCR should be further explored.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK); fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH); immunohistochemistry (IHC); non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)

Year:  2014        PMID: 25806283      PMCID: PMC4367661          DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2218-6751.2014.02.02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res        ISSN: 2218-6751


  30 in total

1.  Comparison of reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, immunohistochemistry, and fluorescence in situ hybridization methodologies for detection of echinoderm microtubule-associated proteinlike 4-anaplastic lymphoma kinase fusion-positive non-small cell lung carcinoma: implications for optimal clinical testing.

Authors:  Michelle L Wallander; Katherine B Geiersbach; Sheryl R Tripp; Lester J Layfield
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 5.534

2.  Early accelerated approval for highly targeted cancer drugs.

Authors:  Bruce A Chabner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Optimal detection of ALK rearranged lung adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Niki Karachaliou; Rafael Rosell
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 15.609

4.  Optimizing the detection of lung cancer patients harboring anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangements potentially suitable for ALK inhibitor treatment.

Authors:  D Ross Camidge; Scott A Kono; Antonella Flacco; Aik-Choon Tan; Robert C Doebele; Qing Zhou; Lucio Crino; Wilbur A Franklin; Marileila Varella-Garcia
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 5.  Testing for anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangement to target crizotinib therapy: oncology, pathology and health economic perspectives.

Authors:  James A Lee; Lukas Bubendorf; Rolf Stahel; Solange Peters
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.512

6.  EML4-ALK fusion is linked to histological characteristics in a subset of lung cancers.

Authors:  Kentaro Inamura; Kengo Takeuchi; Yuki Togashi; Kimie Nomura; Hironori Ninomiya; Michiyo Okui; Yukitoshi Satoh; Sakae Okumura; Ken Nakagawa; Manabu Soda; Young Lim Choi; Toshiro Niki; Hiroyuki Mano; Yuichi Ishikawa
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 15.609

Review 7.  Diagnostic assays for identification of anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Andrew J Weickhardt; Dara L Aisner; Wilbur A Franklin; Marileila Varella-Garcia; Robert C Doebele; D Ross Camidge
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Differential protein stability and ALK inhibitor sensitivity of EML4-ALK fusion variants.

Authors:  Johannes M Heuckmann; Hyatt Balke-Want; Florian Malchers; Martin Peifer; Martin L Sos; Mirjam Koker; Lydia Meder; Christine M Lovly; Lukas C Heukamp; William Pao; Ralf Küppers; Roman K Thomas
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Activity and safety of crizotinib in patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: updated results from a phase 1 study.

Authors:  D Ross Camidge; Yung-Jue Bang; Eunice L Kwak; A John Iafrate; Marileila Varella-Garcia; Stephen B Fox; Gregory J Riely; Benjamin Solomon; Sai-Hong I Ou; Dong-Wan Kim; Ravi Salgia; Panagiotis Fidias; Jeffrey A Engelman; Leena Gandhi; Pasi A Jänne; Daniel B Costa; Geoffrey I Shapiro; Patricia Lorusso; Katherine Ruffner; Patricia Stephenson; Yiyun Tang; Keith Wilner; Jeffrey W Clark; Alice T Shaw
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 41.316

10.  Combined effect of ALK and MEK inhibitors in EML4-ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer cells.

Authors:  J Tanizaki; I Okamoto; K Takezawa; K Sakai; K Azuma; K Kuwata; H Yamaguchi; E Hatashita; K Nishio; P A Janne; K Nakagawa
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  25 in total

1.  Significance and evaluation of anaplastic lymphoma kinase by immunohistochemistry in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Shuting Ding; Nan Liu; Huanyu Zhao; Guiyang Jiang; Xiupeng Zhang; Enhua Wang
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-02-17

Review 2.  Pragmatic issues in biomarker evaluation for targeted therapies in cancer.

Authors:  Armand de Gramont; Sarah Watson; Lee M Ellis; Jordi Rodón; Josep Tabernero; Aimery de Gramont; Stanley R Hamilton
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Rapid detection and genotyping of ALK fusion variants by adapter multiplex PCR and high-resolution melting analysis.

Authors:  Mei Li; Shen Lu; Xu Sun
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 5.662

Review 4.  [Histology, cytology and molecular diagnostics of lung cancer].

Authors:  T Mairinger
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.011

5.  Genomic heterogeneity of ALK fusion breakpoints in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jason N Rosenbaum; Ryan Bloom; Jason T Forys; Jeff Hiken; Jon R Armstrong; Julie Branson; Samantha McNulty; Priya D Velu; Kymberlie Pepin; Haley Abel; Catherine E Cottrell; John D Pfeifer; Shashikant Kulkarni; Ramaswamy Govindan; Eric Q Konnick; Christina M Lockwood; Eric J Duncavage
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 7.842

6.  Detecting anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangements with next-generation sequencing remains a reliable approach in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Ying Ding; Chang Sun; Wei Su; Chen Miao; Xiao He; Jin-Song Wang; Zhi-Hong Zhang
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2022-05-28       Impact factor: 4.535

7.  Assessment of ALK gene fusions in lung cancer using the differential expression and exon integrity methods.

Authors:  Qing Huang; Qiuhua Deng; Lei Jiang; Rong Fang; Yinghua Qiu; Ping Wang; Jeff X Zhou; Haihong Yang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 2.967

8.  Anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive squamous cell carcinoma of the lung: A case report.

Authors:  Yoko Yamamoto; Ken Kodama; Tomohiro Maniwa; Masashi Takeda; Hiroki Kishima
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-04-26

Review 9.  Assays for predicting and monitoring responses to lung cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Cristina Teixidó; Niki Karachaliou; Maria González-Cao; Daniela Morales-Espinosa; Rafael Rosell
Journal:  Cancer Biol Med       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.248

10.  Detecting ALK Rearrangement with RT-PCR: A Reliable Approach Compared with Next-Generation Sequencing in Patients with NSCLC.

Authors:  Yukun Kuang; Peihang Xu; Jiyu Wang; Yifan Zheng; Xue Sun; Zimu Li; RunJing Gan; Huixia Li; Yubiao Guo; Fei Yao; Changbin Zhu; Zunfu Ke; Kejing Tang
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 4.074

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.