AIM: To compare the number of regulatory T-cells (Tregs) measured by flow cytometry with those obtained using a real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) method in patients suffering from inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: Tregs percentages obtained by both flow cytometry and qPCR methods in 35 adult IBD patients, 18 out of them with Crohn´s disease (CD) and 17 with ulcerative colitis (UC) were compared to each other as well as to scores on two IBD activity questionnaires using the Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI) for CD patients and the Simple Colitis Clinical Activity Index (SCCAI) for UC patients. The Treg percentages by flow cytometry were defined as CD4(+)CD25(high)CD127(low)FOXP3(+) cells in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, whereas the Treg percentages by qPCR method were determined as FOXP3 promoter demethylation in genomic DNA. RESULTS: We found an average of 1.56% ± 0.78% Tregs by using flow cytometry, compared to 1.07% ± 0.53% Tregs by using qPCR in adult IBD patients. There were no significant correlations between either the percentages of Tregs measured by flow cytometry or qPCR and the HBI or SCCAI questionnaire scores in CD or UC patients, respectively. In addition, there was no correlation between Treg percentages measured by qPCR and those measured by flow cytometry (r = -0.06, P = 0.73; Spearman Rho). These data suggest that, either Treg-related immune function or the clinical scores in these IBD patients did not accurately reflect actual disease activity. Until the cause(s) for these differences are more clearly defined, the results suggest caution in interpreting studies of Tregs in various inflammatory disorders. CONCLUSION: The two methods did not produce equivalent measures of the percentage of total Tregs in the IBD patients studied which is consistent with the conclusion that Tregs subtypes are not equally detected by these two assays.
AIM: To compare the number of regulatory T-cells (Tregs) measured by flow cytometry with those obtained using a real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) method in patients suffering from inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: Tregs percentages obtained by both flow cytometry and qPCR methods in 35 adult IBDpatients, 18 out of them with Crohn´s disease (CD) and 17 with ulcerative colitis (UC) were compared to each other as well as to scores on two IBD activity questionnaires using the Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI) for CDpatients and the Simple Colitis Clinical Activity Index (SCCAI) for UC patients. The Treg percentages by flow cytometry were defined as CD4(+)CD25(high)CD127(low)FOXP3(+) cells in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, whereas the Treg percentages by qPCR method were determined as FOXP3 promoter demethylation in genomic DNA. RESULTS: We found an average of 1.56% ± 0.78% Tregs by using flow cytometry, compared to 1.07% ± 0.53% Tregs by using qPCR in adult IBDpatients. There were no significant correlations between either the percentages of Tregs measured by flow cytometry or qPCR and the HBI or SCCAI questionnaire scores in CD or UC patients, respectively. In addition, there was no correlation between Treg percentages measured by qPCR and those measured by flow cytometry (r = -0.06, P = 0.73; Spearman Rho). These data suggest that, either Treg-related immune function or the clinical scores in these IBDpatients did not accurately reflect actual disease activity. Until the cause(s) for these differences are more clearly defined, the results suggest caution in interpreting studies of Tregs in various inflammatory disorders. CONCLUSION: The two methods did not produce equivalent measures of the percentage of total Tregs in the IBDpatients studied which is consistent with the conclusion that Tregs subtypes are not equally detected by these two assays.
Authors: Farida Abadja; Eric Alamartine; François Berthoux; Christophe Mariat; Christian Genin; Claude Lambert Journal: Transplantation Date: 2010-02-15 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Georg Wieczorek; Anne Asemissen; Fabian Model; Ivana Turbachova; Stefan Floess; Volker Liebenberg; Udo Baron; Diana Stauch; Katja Kotsch; Johann Pratschke; Alf Hamann; Christoph Loddenkemper; Harald Stein; Hans Dieter Volk; Ulrich Hoffmüller; Andreas Grützkau; Alexander Mustea; Jochen Huehn; Carmen Scheibenbogen; Sven Olek Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2009-01-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Nana-Maria Wagner; Gunnar Brandhorst; Frauke Czepluch; Mareike Lankeit; Christoph Eberle; Sebastian Herzberg; Vivien Faustin; Joachim Riggert; Michael Oellerich; Gerd Hasenfuss; Stavros Konstantinides; Katrin Schäfer Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Veera Hölttä; Taina Sipponen; Mia Westerholm-Ormio; Harri M Salo; Kaija-Leena Kolho; Martti Färkkilä; Erkki Savilahti; Outi Vaarala; Paula Klemetti Journal: ISRN Gastroenterol Date: 2012-06-14
Authors: Weihong Liu; Amy L Putnam; Zhou Xu-Yu; Gregory L Szot; Michael R Lee; Shirley Zhu; Peter A Gottlieb; Philipp Kapranov; Thomas R Gingeras; Barbara Fazekas de St Groth; Carol Clayberger; David M Soper; Steven F Ziegler; Jeffrey A Bluestone Journal: J Exp Med Date: 2006-07-03 Impact factor: 14.307