Ozgur Pilanci1, Karaca Basaran1, Hasan Utkan Aydin1, Oguz Cortuk1, Samet Vasfi Kuvat1. 1. Drs Pilanci and Basaran are Instructor Fellows, Dr Cortuk is a resident, and Dr Kuvat is an Associate Professor in the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery at Bagcilar Research and Training Hospital in Istanbul, Turkey. Dr Aydin is an Instructor Fellow and Dr Kuvat is the Chief of the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery at the Istanbul University Faculty of Medicine in Turkey.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Correction of gynecomastia in males is a frequently performed aesthetic procedure. Various surgical options involving the removal of excess skin, fat, or glandular tissue have been described. However, poor aesthetic outcomes, including a flat or depressed pectoral area, limit the success of these techniques. OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to determine patient satisfaction with the results of upper chest augmentation by direct intrapectoral fat injection in conjunction with surgical correction of gynecomastia. METHODS: In this prospective study, 26 patients underwent liposuction and glandular excision, glandular excision alone, or Benelli-type skin excision. All patients received intramuscular fat injections in predetermined zones of the pectoralis major (PM). The mean volume of fat injected was 160 mL (range, 80-220 mL per breast) bilaterally. Patients were monitored for an average of 16 months (range, 8-24 months). RESULTS: Hematoma formation and consequent infraareolar depression was noted in 1 patient and was corrected by secondary lipografting. Mean patient satisfaction was rated as 8.4 on a scale of 1 (unsatisfactory) to 10 (highly satisfactory). CONCLUSIONS: Autologous intrapectoral fat injection performed simultaneously with gynecomastia correction can produce a masculine appearance. The long-term viability of fat cells injected into the PM needs to be determined. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Therapeutic.
BACKGROUND: Correction of gynecomastia in males is a frequently performed aesthetic procedure. Various surgical options involving the removal of excess skin, fat, or glandular tissue have been described. However, poor aesthetic outcomes, including a flat or depressed pectoral area, limit the success of these techniques. OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to determine patient satisfaction with the results of upper chest augmentation by direct intrapectoral fat injection in conjunction with surgical correction of gynecomastia. METHODS: In this prospective study, 26 patients underwent liposuction and glandular excision, glandular excision alone, or Benelli-type skin excision. All patients received intramuscular fat injections in predetermined zones of the pectoralis major (PM). The mean volume of fat injected was 160 mL (range, 80-220 mL per breast) bilaterally. Patients were monitored for an average of 16 months (range, 8-24 months). RESULTS:Hematoma formation and consequent infraareolar depression was noted in 1 patient and was corrected by secondary lipografting. Mean patient satisfaction was rated as 8.4 on a scale of 1 (unsatisfactory) to 10 (highly satisfactory). CONCLUSIONS: Autologous intrapectoral fat injection performed simultaneously with gynecomastia correction can produce a masculine appearance. The long-term viability of fat cells injected into the PM needs to be determined. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Therapeutic.