Literature DB >> 25805148

Effects of contextual information and stimulus ambiguity on overt visual sampling behavior.

T C Kietzmann1, P König2.   

Abstract

The sampling of our visual environment through saccadic eye movements is an essential function of the brain, allowing us to overcome the limits of peripheral vision. Understanding which parts of a scene attract overt visual attention is subject to intense research, and considerable progress has been made in unraveling the underlying cortical mechanisms. In contrast to spatial aspects, however, relatively little is understood about temporal aspects of overt visual sampling. At every fixation, the oculomotor system faces the decision whether to keep exploring different aspects of an object or scene or whether to remain fixated to allow for in-depth cortical processing - a situation that can be understood in terms of an exploration-exploitation dilemma. To improve our understanding of the factors involved in these decisions, we here investigate how the level of visual information, experimentally manipulated by scene context and stimulus ambiguity, changes the sampling behavior preceding the recognition of centrally presented ambiguous and disambiguated objects. Behaviorally, we find that context, although only presented until the first voluntary saccade, biases the perceptual outcome and significantly reduces reaction times. Importantly, we find that increased information about an object significantly alters its visual exploration, as evident through increased fixation durations and reduced saccade amplitudes. These results demonstrate that the initial sampling of an object, preceding its recognition, is subject to change based on the amount of information available in the system: increased evidence for its identity biases the exploration-exploitation strategy towards in-depth analyses.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Ambiguous stimuli; Exploration–exploitation; Eye movements; Fixation duration; Object recognition; Scene context

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25805148     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.02.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  5 in total

1.  Eye movements shape visual learning.

Authors:  Pooya Laamerad; Daniel Guitton; Christopher C Pack
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  An extensive dataset of eye movements during viewing of complex images.

Authors:  Niklas Wilming; Selim Onat; José P Ossandón; Alper Açık; Tim C Kietzmann; Kai Kaspar; Ricardo R Gameiro; Alexandra Vormberg; Peter König
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 6.444

3.  Differential Contribution of Low- and High-level Image Content to Eye Movements in Monkeys and Humans.

Authors:  Niklas Wilming; Tim C Kietzmann; Megan Jutras; Cheng Xue; Stefan Treue; Elizabeth A Buffalo; Peter König
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Global visual salience of competing stimuli.

Authors:  Alex Hernández-García; Ricardo Ramos Gameiro; Alessandro Grillini; Peter König
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Eye-tracking indices of impaired encoding of visual short-term memory in familial Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Ivanna M Pavisic; Yoni Pertzov; Jennifer M Nicholas; Antoinette O'Connor; Kirsty Lu; Keir X X Yong; Masud Husain; Nick C Fox; Sebastian J Crutch
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.