OBJECTIVE: We investigated the association between adherence to the recommendations of the World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (WCRF/AICR) and breast cancer (BC) risk in the Cancer de Màma (CAMA) study in a Mexican population. DESIGN: Population-based case-control study. SUBJECTS: Incident BC cases (n 1000) and controls (n 1074) matched on age, region and health-care system were recruited. SETTING: In-person interviews were conducted to assess BC risk factors and habitual diet was assessed with an FFQ. Conformity to the WCRF/AICR recommendations was evaluated through a score incorporating seven WCRF/AICR components (body fatness, physical activity, foods and drinks that promote weight gain, plant foods, animal foods, alcoholic drinks and breast-feeding), with high scores indicating adherence to the WCRF/AICR recommendations. RESULTS: No statistically significant associations between WCRF/AICR score and risk of BC were observed. After excluding BMI from the WCRF/AICR score, the top quartile was associated with a decreased BC risk overall, with ORQ4-Q1=0.68 (95% CI 0.49, 0.92, P trend=0.03), and among postmenopausal women, with ORQ4-Q1=0.60 (95% CI 0.39, 0.94, P trend=0.03). Inverse associations were observed between BMI and risk of BC overall and among premenopausal women, with OR=0.57 (95% CI 0.42, 0.76, P trend <0.01) and 0.48 (95% CI 0.31, 0.73, P trend<0.01), respectively. Physical activity level was inversely associated with BC risk. CONCLUSIONS: The WCRF/AICR index was not related with BC risk in the CAMA study. A combination of six components excluding BMI showed strong protective associations, particularly in postmenopausal women. Further prospective studies are required to clarify the role of adherence to WCRF/AICR recommendations, particularly with respect to BMI, in the Mexican population.
OBJECTIVE: We investigated the association between adherence to the recommendations of the World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research (WCRF/AICR) and breast cancer (BC) risk in the Cancer de Màma (CAMA) study in a Mexican population. DESIGN: Population-based case-control study. SUBJECTS: Incident BC cases (n 1000) and controls (n 1074) matched on age, region and health-care system were recruited. SETTING: In-person interviews were conducted to assess BC risk factors and habitual diet was assessed with an FFQ. Conformity to the WCRF/AICR recommendations was evaluated through a score incorporating seven WCRF/AICR components (body fatness, physical activity, foods and drinks that promote weight gain, plant foods, animal foods, alcoholic drinks and breast-feeding), with high scores indicating adherence to the WCRF/AICR recommendations. RESULTS: No statistically significant associations between WCRF/AICR score and risk of BC were observed. After excluding BMI from the WCRF/AICR score, the top quartile was associated with a decreased BC risk overall, with ORQ4-Q1=0.68 (95% CI 0.49, 0.92, P trend=0.03), and among postmenopausal women, with ORQ4-Q1=0.60 (95% CI 0.39, 0.94, P trend=0.03). Inverse associations were observed between BMI and risk of BC overall and among premenopausal women, with OR=0.57 (95% CI 0.42, 0.76, P trend <0.01) and 0.48 (95% CI 0.31, 0.73, P trend<0.01), respectively. Physical activity level was inversely associated with BC risk. CONCLUSIONS: The WCRF/AICR index was not related with BC risk in the CAMA study. A combination of six components excluding BMI showed strong protective associations, particularly in postmenopausal women. Further prospective studies are required to clarify the role of adherence to WCRF/AICR recommendations, particularly with respect to BMI, in the Mexican population.
Entities:
Keywords:
Breast cancer; Diet; Mexican women; Physical activity; Weight management
Authors: Fred K Tabung; Teresa T Fung; Jorge E Chavarro; Stephanie A Smith-Warner; Walter C Willett; Edward L Giovannucci Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2016-11-14 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Katie M Di Sebastiano; Gayathri Murthy; Kristin L Campbell; Sophie Desroches; Rachel A Murphy Journal: Adv Nutr Date: 2019-05-01 Impact factor: 8.701
Authors: Sarah J O Nomura; Chiranjeev Dash; Lynn Rosenberg; Jeffrey Yu; Julie R Palmer; Lucile L Adams-Campbell Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2016-09-19 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Aimee L Lucas; Francesca Bravi; Paolo Boffetta; Jerry Polesel; Diego Serraino; Carlo La Vecchia; Cristina Bosetti Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Date: 2015-11-21 Impact factor: 2.984
Authors: Trudy Voortman; Jessica C Kiefte-de Jong; M Arfan Ikram; Bruno H Stricker; Frank J A van Rooij; Lies Lahousse; Henning Tiemeier; Guy G Brusselle; Oscar H Franco; Josje D Schoufour Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2017-08-19 Impact factor: 8.082