Literature DB >> 25804439

A Practical Guide to Check the Consistency of Item Response Patterns in Clinical Research Through Person-Fit Statistics: Examples and a Computer Program.

Rob R Meijer1, A Susan M Niessen2, Jorge N Tendeiro2.   

Abstract

Although there are many studies devoted to person-fit statistics to detect inconsistent item score patterns, most studies are difficult to understand for nonspecialists. The aim of this tutorial is to explain the principles of these statistics for researchers and clinicians who are interested in applying these statistics. In particular, we first explain how invalid test scores can be detected using person-fit statistics; second, we provide the reader practical examples of existing studies that used person-fit statistics to detect and to interpret inconsistent item score patterns; and third, we discuss a new R-package that can be used to identify and interpret inconsistent score patterns.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  data forensics; item response theory; person fit; validity of test scores

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25804439     DOI: 10.1177/1073191115577800

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Assessment        ISSN: 1073-1911


  9 in total

1.  Entropy-Based Measures for Person Fit in Item Response Theory.

Authors:  William R Dardick; Brandi A Weiss
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2017-04-06

2.  Person misfit on the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology: Low quality self-report or true atypical symptom profile?

Authors:  Judith M Conijn; Philip Spinhoven; Rob R Meijer; Femke Lamers
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 4.035

3.  Evaluation of the link between the Guttman errors and response shift at the individual level.

Authors:  Yseulys Dubuy; Véronique Sébille; Marie Grall-Bronnec; Gaëlle Challet-Bouju; Myriam Blanchin; Jean-Benoit Hardouin
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-10-17       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Practical Person-Fit Assessment with the Linear FA Model: New Developments and a Comparative Study.

Authors:  Pere J Ferrando; Andreu Vigil-Colet; Urbano Lorenzo-Seva
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-12-27

5.  Are Exam Questions Known in Advance? Using Local Dependence to Detect Cheating.

Authors:  Stefan Zimmermann; Dietrich Klusmann; Wolfgang Hampe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A Psychometric Analysis of the Italian Version of the eHealth Literacy Scale Using Item Response and Classical Test Theory Methods.

Authors:  Nicola Diviani; Alexandra Lelia Dima; Peter Johannes Schulz
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Using Person Fit Statistics to Detect Outliers in Survey Research.

Authors:  John M Felt; Ruben Castaneda; Jitske Tiemensma; Sarah Depaoli
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-05-26

8.  Satisficing in Mental Health Care Patients: The Effect of Cognitive Symptoms on Self-Report Data Quality.

Authors:  Judith M Conijn; L Andries van der Ark; Philip Spinhoven
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2017-07-13

9.  Scale validation in applied health research: tutorial for a 6-step R-based psychometrics protocol.

Authors:  Alexandra L Dima
Journal:  Health Psychol Behav Med       Date:  2018-05-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.