INTRODUCTION: The results of a 2001-2005 polycythemia vera (PV) investigation in Eastern Pennsylvania revealed a disease cluster plus underreporting and false reporting to the Pennsylvania Cancer Registry (PCR). PURPOSE: The objectives of this study were 1) to assess PV reporting to the PCR in 2006-2009, 2) to determine whether a cancer cluster persisted, and 3) to determine whether other myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), including essential thrombocytopenia (ET), were subject to similar reporting problems. METHODS: Cases were identified from: 1) PCR records from the Tri-County, 2) reviewing billing records at Tri-County hematologist/oncologist offices, and 3) self-identification. An expert panel of physicians reviewed medical records and determined "true," "false," or "indeterminate" cases reported to the PCR. The analyses were conducted to determine sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) of case reporting to the PCR, estimate cancer incidence rates, and evaluate the presence of cancer clusters. RESULTS: Of 290 cases identified, 90% were from the original PCR, 9% from billing records, and 1% from self-report. Fifty-five cases consented to participate, and medical records were obtained for 44. The expert panel determined that 45% were true cases, 32% were false cases, and 23% were indeterminate. PV had 100% (95% CI, 59-100) sensitivity, but only 47% PPV (95% CI, 20-70): ET had 78% (95% CI, 47-99) sensitivity and 100% PPV (95% CI, 59-100). Low participation and chart review rates led to rates with wide confidence intervals. We did not identify any PV cancer clusters, but we did identify a cluster of 9 ET cases in the Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania area. CONCLUSION: The current study was limited by the low response rate (22%) from MPN patients in the Tri-County area. This study identified 47% PPV for PV reporting and 100% PPV for ET.
INTRODUCTION: The results of a 2001-2005 polycythemia vera (PV) investigation in Eastern Pennsylvania revealed a disease cluster plus underreporting and false reporting to the Pennsylvania Cancer Registry (PCR). PURPOSE: The objectives of this study were 1) to assess PV reporting to the PCR in 2006-2009, 2) to determine whether a cancer cluster persisted, and 3) to determine whether other myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), including essential thrombocytopenia (ET), were subject to similar reporting problems. METHODS: Cases were identified from: 1) PCR records from the Tri-County, 2) reviewing billing records at Tri-County hematologist/oncologist offices, and 3) self-identification. An expert panel of physicians reviewed medical records and determined "true," "false," or "indeterminate" cases reported to the PCR. The analyses were conducted to determine sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) of case reporting to the PCR, estimate cancer incidence rates, and evaluate the presence of cancer clusters. RESULTS: Of 290 cases identified, 90% were from the original PCR, 9% from billing records, and 1% from self-report. Fifty-five cases consented to participate, and medical records were obtained for 44. The expert panel determined that 45% were true cases, 32% were false cases, and 23% were indeterminate. PV had 100% (95% CI, 59-100) sensitivity, but only 47% PPV (95% CI, 20-70): ET had 78% (95% CI, 47-99) sensitivity and 100% PPV (95% CI, 59-100). Low participation and chart review rates led to rates with wide confidence intervals. We did not identify any PV cancer clusters, but we did identify a cluster of 9 ET cases in the Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania area. CONCLUSION: The current study was limited by the low response rate (22%) from MPNpatients in the Tri-County area. This study identified 47% PPV for PV reporting and 100% PPV for ET.
Authors: Kristen J Mertz; Jeanine M Buchanich; Terri L Washington; Elizabeth A Irvin-Barnwell; Donald V Woytowitz; Roy E Smith Journal: J Registry Manag Date: 2015
Authors: Vincent Seaman; Steve M Dearwent; Debra Gable; Brian Lewis; Susan Metcalf; Ken Orloff; Bruce Tierney; Jane Zhu; James Logue; David Marchetto; Stephen Ostroff; Ronald Hoffman; Mingjiang Xu; David Carey; Porat Erlich; Glenn Gerhard; Paul Roda; Joseph Iannuzzo; Robert Lewis; John Mellow; Linda Mulvihill; Zachary Myles; Manxia Wu; Arthur Frank; Carol Ann Gross-Davis; Judith Klotz; Adam Lynch; Joel Weissfeld; Rona Weinberg; Henry Cole Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2010-03-17 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Dana E Rollison; Nadia Howlader; Martyn T Smith; Sara S Strom; William D Merritt; Lynn A Ries; Brenda K Edwards; Alan F List Journal: Blood Date: 2008-04-28 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Vincent Seaman; Aisha Jumaan; Emad Yanni; Brian Lewis; Jonathan Neyer; Paul Roda; Mingjiang Xu; Ronald Hoffman Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2009-02-03 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Carol Ann Gross-Davis; Karyn Heavner; Arthur L Frank; Craig Newschaffer; Judith Klotz; Regina M Santella; Igor Burstyn Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2015-02-24 Impact factor: 3.390