| Literature DB >> 25803290 |
Alessandro P Silva1, Sueli O S Prado1, Terigi A Scardovelli1, Silvia R M S Boschi1, Luiz C Campos2, Annie F Frère1.
Abstract
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) mainly affects the academic performance of children and adolescents. In addition to bringing physical and mental health benefits, physical activity has been used to prevent and improve ADHD comorbidities; however, its effectiveness has not been quantified. In this study, the effect of physical activity on children's attention was measured using a computer game. Intense physical activity was promoted by a relay race, which requires a 5-min run without a rest interval. The proposed physical stimulus was performed with 28 volunteers: 14 with ADHD (GE-EF) and 14 without ADHD symptoms (GC-EF). After 5 min of rest, these volunteers accessed the computer game to accomplish the tasks in the shortest time possible. The computer game was also accessed by another 28 volunteers: 14 with ADHD (GE) and 14 without these symptoms (GC). The response time to solve the tasks that require attention was recorded. The results of the four groups were analyzed using D'Agostino statistical tests of normality, Kruskal-Wallis analyses of variance and post-hoc Dunn tests. The groups of volunteers with ADHD who performed exercise (GE-EF) showed improved performance for the tasks that require attention with a difference of 30.52% compared with the volunteers with ADHD who did not perform the exercise (GE). The (GE-EF) group showed similar performance (2.5% difference) with the volunteers in the (GC) group who have no ADHD symptoms and did not exercise. This study shows that intense exercise can improve the attention of children with ADHD and may help their school performance.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25803290 PMCID: PMC4372555 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122119
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1External Environment [6].
Fig 2Internal Environment [6].
Fig 3The game’s logical diagram [6].
Game’s task description.
| Level one | Task 1 | Find the resident who knows the secrets of Treasure Island; |
| Task 2 | Find the trunk where the first part of the mandala is located; | |
| Task 3 | Find the key that opens the trunk; | |
| Task 4 | Go back to the trunk and catch the first part of the mandala; | |
| Task 5 | Find the lake where the second part of the mandala is submerged; | |
| Task 6 | Find a fishing net to catch the second part of the mandala; | |
| Task 7 | Return to the lake to catch the second part of the mandala; | |
| Task 8 | Locate the mine where the other parts of the mandala resides; | |
| Task 9 | Find the axe to break the fence that blocks the mine entrance; | |
| Level two: | Task 10 | Find the wizard who knows where the third part of the mandala is located; |
| Task 11 | Find the place indicated by the wizard; | |
| Task 12 | Frighten the owl that guards the third part of the mandala; | |
| Task 13 | Find the wizard, who then requests the player to locate his lost ring in exchange for the fourth part of the mandala; | |
| Task 14 | Find the wizard’s ring; | |
| Task 15 | Find a piece of meat to capture the tiger that guards the wizard’s ring; | |
| Task 16 | Return to the wizard and give him the ring to receive the fourth part of the mandala; | |
| Task 17 | Find the treasure room; | |
| Task 18 | Finally, insert the completed mandala into the hole on the wall close to the treasure room’s door to unlock it. |
Sum of spend time for each task of game by all groups.
| Tasks | GE-EF | GC-EF | GE | GC | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Task 1 | 297,37 | ± 3% | 1226,07 | ± 6,34% | 733,77 | ± 2,06% | 365,70 | ± 2,41% |
| Task 2 | 385,29 | ± 5,72% | 1038,30 | ± 3,85% | 590,12 | ± 0,65% | 435,72 | ± 2,13% |
| Task 3 | 634,89 | ± 1,12% | 1787,97 | ± 5,37% | 1082,36 | ± 2,36% | 1051,19 | ± 2,52% |
| Task 4 | 168,40 | ± 2,01% | 396,00 | ± 3,52% | 287,66 | ± 1,81% | 227,98 | ± 2,11% |
| Task 5 | 255,41 | ± 1,83% | 610,80 | ± 3,11% | 296,53 | ± 1,67% | 300,16 | ± 1,58% |
| Task 6 | 203,19 | ± 2,66% | 727,61 | ± 3,35% | 516,27 | ± 4,54% | 384,57 | ± 2,04% |
| Task 7 | 156,56 | ± 2,68% | 380,84 | ± 4,54% | 220,14 | ± 1,15% | 237,77 | ± 2,09% |
| Task 8 | 296,73 | ± 3,80% | 786,00 | ± 4,19% | 467,67 | ± 2,49% | 422,92 | ± 2,19% |
| Task 9 | 582,03 | ± 3,50% | 1229,39 | ± 3,13% | 622,61 | ± 1,36% | 621,31 | ± 2,28% |
| Task 10 | 307,21 | ± 1,37% | 370,45 | ± 2,54% | 714,74 | ± 7,18% | 199,98 | ± 0,88% |
| Task 11 | 268,96 | ± 1,97% | 243,35 | ± 2,21% | 464,39 | ± 2,74% | 188,28 | ± 1,42% |
| Task 12 | 495,87 | ± 3,73% | 401,99 | ± 3,28% | 527,43 | ± 2,59% | 303,45 | ± 3,14% |
| Task 13 | 309,67 | ± 1,57% | 364,77 | ± 2,08% | 581,53 | ± 4,31% | 235,78 | ± 3,63% |
| Task 14 | 291,44 | ± 1,50% | 489,13 | ± 3,96% | 442,27 | ± 2,09% | 271,25 | ± 2,10% |
| Task 15 | 689,10 | ± 0,68% | 596,34 | ± 3,33% | 844,30 | ± 1,88% | 452,56 | ± 1,84% |
| Task 16 | 197,98 | ± 1,59% | 137,71 | ± 0,84% | 261,66 | ±2,85% | 129,14 | ±1,56% |
| Task 17 | 836,98 | ± 1,36% | 681,01 | ± 2,29% | 762,11 | ± 2,03% | 599,07 | ± 0,89% |
| Task 18 | 990,06 | ± 0,52% | 875,77 | ± 2,97% | 1183,67 | ± 1,85% | 755,93 | ± 1,23% |
Average time (seconds) taken by the participants of the groups in each game’s task.
| Tasks | GE-EF | GC-EF | GE | GC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Task 1 | 21.24 | 87.58 | 52.41 | 26.12 |
| Task 2 | 27.52 | 74.16 | 42.15 | 31.12 |
| Task 3 | 45.35 | 127.71 | 77.31 | 75.08 |
| Task 4 | 12.03 | 28.29 | 20.55 | 16.28 |
| Task 5 | 18.24 | 43.63 | 21.18 | 21.44 |
| Task 6 | 14.51 | 51.97 | 36.88 | 27.47 |
| Task 7 | 11.18 | 27.2 | 15.72 | 16.98 |
| Task 8 | 21.19 | 56.14 | 33.4 | 30.21 |
| Task 9 | 41.57 | 87.81 | 44.47 | 44.38 |
| Task 10 | 21.94 | 26.46 | 51.05 | 14.28 |
| Task 11 | 19.21 | 17.38 | 33.17 | 13.45 |
| Task 12 | 35.42 | 28.71 | 37.67 | 21.68 |
| Task 13 | 22.12 | 26.05 | 41.54 | 16.84 |
| Task 14 | 20.82 | 34.94 | 31.59 | 19.38 |
| Task 15 | 49.22 | 42.6 | 60.31 | 32.33 |
| Task 16 | 14.14 | 9.84 | 18.69 | 9.22 |
| Task 17 | 59.78 | 48.64 | 54.44 | 42.79 |
| Task 18 | 70.72 | 62.56 | 84.55 | 53.99 |
Relative percentages for each game’s task by all groups.
| Tasks | GE-EF | GC-EF | GE | GC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Task 1 | 81 | 335 | 201 | 100 |
| Task 2 | 88 | 238 | 135 | 100 |
| Task 3 | 60 | 170 | 103 | 100 |
| Task 4 | 74 | 174 | 126 | 100 |
| Task 5 | 85 | 203 | 99 | 100 |
| Task 6 | 53 | 189 | 134 | 100 |
| Task 7 | 66 | 160 | 93 | 100 |
| Task 8 | 70 | 186 | 111 | 100 |
| Task 9 | 94 | 198 | 100 | 100 |
| Task 10 | 154 | 185 | 357 | 100 |
| Task 11 | 143 | 129 | 247 | 100 |
| Task 12 | 163 | 132 | 174 | 100 |
| Task 13 | 131 | 155 | 247 | 100 |
| Task 14 | 107 | 180 | 163 | 100 |
| Task 15 | 152 | 132 | 187 | 100 |
| Task 16 | 153 | 107 | 203 | 100 |
| Task 17 | 140 | 114 | 127 | 100 |
| Task 18 | 131 | 116 | 157 | 100 |
Fig 4Graph by sum of average time taken by group GE-EF and GC to complete the game.
Fig 5Graph of percentage by group GE-EF and GE to complete the game.
Sum of the average time all groups in the full game.
| groups | Average Time (s) |
|---|---|
| GE-EF | 526 |
| GE | 757 |
| GC-EF | 882 |
| GC | 513 |
Fig 6Graph of the average performance of the 4 groups.
Statistical analysis using the method Dunn.
| Comparison using method Dunn | p |
|---|---|
| GE-EF versus GC-EF | < 0,05 |
| GE-EF versus GE | < 0,05 |
| GE-EF versus GC | ns |
| GC-EF versus GE | ns |
| GC-EF versus GC | < 0,05 |
| GE versus GC | < 0,05 |
Fig 7Graph of the average performance of the 4 subgroups.