Haluk Özcanlı1, Gamze Bektaş2, Ali Cavit3, Ahmet Duymaz2, O Koray Coşkunfırat2. 1. Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey. halukozcanli@hotmail.com. 2. Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey. 3. Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to present our findings for the use of the digital artery perforator (DAP) flap in the covering of digital pulp defects. METHODS: The study included 15 patients who underwent reconstruction of the fingertip using a DAP flap between July 2007 and February 2012. The blood supply of the perforator island flap was based on the distal and either radial or ulnar sides of the digit. Donor sites were closed using skin grafting in all cases. Static two-point discrimination (s2PD) and Semmes-Weinstein monofilament (SWM) testing was performed at the final follow-up to determine extension loss and sensorial improvement. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 22 (range: 7 to 62) months. Flaps size was between 2 x 1 cm and 2.5 x 1.5 cm. Temporary venous congestion was observed in 12 of the 15 patients and was without complication. All patients returned to their normal daily activities and work within an average of 39 (range: 30 to 45) days. Mean two-point discrimination was 5.3 mm and SWM test results were between 3.61 and 4.56 at the final follow-up. CONCLUSION: The DAP flap appears to be a reliable procedure with several advantages as a single-stage operating procedure, easy to harvest, good sensory recovery and preservation of digital arteries.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to present our findings for the use of the digital artery perforator (DAP) flap in the covering of digital pulp defects. METHODS: The study included 15 patients who underwent reconstruction of the fingertip using a DAP flap between July 2007 and February 2012. The blood supply of the perforator island flap was based on the distal and either radial or ulnar sides of the digit. Donor sites were closed using skin grafting in all cases. Static two-point discrimination (s2PD) and Semmes-Weinstein monofilament (SWM) testing was performed at the final follow-up to determine extension loss and sensorial improvement. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 22 (range: 7 to 62) months. Flaps size was between 2 x 1 cm and 2.5 x 1.5 cm. Temporary venous congestion was observed in 12 of the 15 patients and was without complication. All patients returned to their normal daily activities and work within an average of 39 (range: 30 to 45) days. Mean two-point discrimination was 5.3 mm and SWM test results were between 3.61 and 4.56 at the final follow-up. CONCLUSION: The DAP flap appears to be a reliable procedure with several advantages as a single-stage operating procedure, easy to harvest, good sensory recovery and preservation of digital arteries.