| Literature DB >> 25803047 |
Emily H Belser1, Bradley S Cohen1, Shamus P Keeler2, Charles H Killmaster3, John W Bowers3, Karl V Miller1.
Abstract
Cranial/intracranial abscess disease is an emerging source of significant mortality for male white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). Most cases of cranial/intracranial abscess disease are associated with infection by the opportunistic pathogen Trueperella pyogenes although the relationship between the prevalence of the bacteria and occurrence of disease is speculative. We examined 5,612 hunter-harvested deer from 29 sites across all physiographic provinces in Georgia for evidence of cranial abscess disease and sampled the forehead, lingual, and nasal surfaces from 692 deer. We used polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to determine presence of T. pyogenes from these samples. We found T. pyogenes prevalence at a site was a predictor for the occurrence of cranial abscess disease. Prevalence of T. pyogenes did not differ between samples from the nose or tongue although prevalence along the forehead was greater for males than females (p = 0.04), particularly at sites with high occurrence of this disease. Socio-sexual behaviors, bacterial prevalence, or physiological characteristics may predispose male deer to intracranial/cranial abscess disease. Determination of factors that affect T. pyogenes prevalence among sites may help explain the occurrence of this disease among populations.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25803047 PMCID: PMC4372218 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120028
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Location of 29 sites and the number of hunter-harvested adult (≥1.5 years old) male white-tailed deer testing positive for cranial abscess disease and the number examined for the presence of the cranial abscess disease in Georgia, USA during Fall 2011 and 2012.
Prevalence and the number of hunter-harvested white-tailed deer sampled (M = Male; F = Female; U = Unknown) for Trueperella pyogenes across 29 locations in Georgia during 2011 and 2012.
Prevalence is reported as the percent of samples that were positive on the head, nose, tongue, and overall (i.e., detection of T. pyogenes on any surface) ± 95% confidence intervals.
| Location by county (and code) |
| Head (%) | Nose (%) | Tongue (%) | Overall (%) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M | F | U | Lower | Mean | Upper | Lower | Mean | Upper | Lower | Mean | Upper | Lower | Mean | Upper | |
| Baker (IW) | 8 | 20 | 2 | 4.4 | 13.3 | 31.6 | 26.0 | 43.3 | 62.3 | 8.4 | 20.0 | 39.1 | 33.1 | 50.0 | 66.8 |
| Burke (DL) | 19 | 11 | - | 23.2 | 40.0 | 59.2 | 37.7 | 56.7 | 74.0 | 2.6 | 10.0 | 27.7 | 57.3 | 76.7 | 89.4 |
| Chatham (OB) | 22 | 8 | - | 8.4 | 20.0 | 39.1 | 2.6 | 10.0 | 27.7 | 4.4 | 13.3 | 31.6 | 26.0 | 43.3 | 62.3 |
| Dougherty (CH) | 28 | 2 | - | 8.4 | 20.0 | 39.1 | 1.2 | 6.7 | 23.5 | 1.2 | 6.7 | 23.5 | 13.0 | 26.7 | 46.2 |
| Fannin (CK) | 16 | 14 | - | 8.4 | 20.0 | 39.1 | 10.6 | 23.3 | 42.7 | 4.4 | 13.3 | 31.6 | 26.0 | 43.3 | 62.3 |
| Floyd (BC) | 25 | 5 | - | 2.6 | 10.0 | 27.7 | 1.2 | 6.7 | 23.5 | 1.2 | 6.7 | 23.5 | 6.3 | 16.7 | 35.5 |
| Gilmer (RM) | 8 | 5 | - | 15.1 | 38.4 | 67.7 | 6.2 | 23.1 | 54.0 | 2.7 | 15.4 | 46.3 | 32.3 | 61.5 | 84.9 |
| Habersham (LR) | 19 | 6 | - | 38.9 | 60.0 | 78.2 | 5.3 | 16.0 | 36.9 | 5.3 | 16.0 | 36.9 | 46.4 | 68.0 | 84.3 |
| Harris (TB) | 10 | 10 | 5 | 38.9 | 60.0 | 78.2 | 63.1 | 84.0 | 94.7 | 35.3 | 56.0 | 75.0 | 72.5 | 92.0 | 98.6 |
| Houston (OW) | 25 | - | - | 5.3 | 16.0 | 36.9 | 31.8 | 52.0 | 71.7 | 5.3 | 16.0 | 36.9 | 42.6 | 64.0 | 81.3 |
| Laurens (RB) | 16 | 2 | - | 7.4 | 22.2 | 48.1 | 10.7 | 27.8 | 53.6 | 7.4 | 22.2 | 48.1 | 36.1 | 61.1 | 81.7 |
| Lee (PP) | 3 | - | 27 | 26.0 | 43.3 | 62.3 | 43.9 | 63.3 | 79.5 | 34.6 | 53.3 | 71.2 | 76.5 | 93.3 | 98.8 |
| Lowndes (GB) | 4 | 1 | - | 1.1 | 20.0 | 70.1 | 1.1 | 20.0 | 70.1 | 1.1 | 20.0 | 70.1 | 17.0 | 60.0 | 92.7 |
| Meriwether 1 (JK) | 14 | 7 | - | 9.1 | 23.8 | 47.5 | 1.7 | 9.5 | 31.8 | 0.2 | 4.8 | 25.9 | 9.1 | 23.8 | 47.5 |
| Meriwether 2 (RW) | 11 | 3 | - | 56.1 | 85.7 | 97.5 | 42.0 | 71.4 | 90.4 | 9.6 | 28.6 | 58.0 | 73.2 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
| Paulding (PF) | 23 | 2 | - | 1.4 | 8.0 | 27.5 | 5.3 | 16.0 | 36.9 | 7.6 | 20.0 | 41.3 | 15.7 | 32.0 | 53.6 |
| Putnam 1 (BF) | 24 | 6 | - | 10.6 | 23.3 | 42.7 | 13.0 | 26.7 | 46.2 | 4.4 | 13.3 | 31.6 | 34.6 | 53.3 | 71.2 |
| Putnam 2 (CC) | 30 | - | - | 33.1 | 50.0 | 66.8 | 6.3 | 16.7 | 35.5 | 0.2 | 3.3 | 19.1 | 40.8 | 60.0 | 76.8 |
| Screven (TU) | 12 | 13 | - | 10.2 | 24.0 | 45.5 | 1.4 | 8.0 | 27.5 | 12.9 | 28.0 | 49.6 | 21.8 | 40.0 | 61.1 |
| Sumter (FR) | 12 | 12 | - | 0.0 | 0.0 | 17.2 | 31.4 | 50.0 | 68.6 | 3.3 | 12.5 | 33.5 | 36.9 | 58.3 | 77.2 |
| Talbot (BL) | 12 | 13 | - | 0.2 | 4.0 | 22.3 | 28.3 | 48.0 | 68.2 | 5.3 | 16.0 | 36.9 | 31.8 | 52.0 | 71.7 |
| Telfair (HC) | 11 | 2 | - | 0.4 | 7.7 | 37.9 | 15.1 | 38.5 | 67.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 28.3 | 15.1 | 38.5 | 67.7 |
| Toombs (PL) | 4 | 16 | 9 | 16.0 | 31.0 | 51.0 | 36.0 | 55.2 | 73.0 | 13.4 | 27.6 | 47.5 | 52.5 | 72.4 | 86.6 |
| Twiggs (OG) | 30 | - | - | 20.5 | 36.7 | 56.1 | 1.2 | 6.7 | 23.5 | 1.2 | 6.7 | 23.5 | 26.0 | 43.3 | 62.3 |
| Upson (MH) | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0.7 | 12.5 | 53.3 | 21.5 | 50.0 | 78.5 | 10.2 | 37.5 | 74.1 | 25.9 | 62.5 | 89.8 |
| Walker (CP) | 24 | 5 | 1 | 4.4 | 13.3 | 31.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 14.1 | 6.3 | 16.7 | 35.5 | 13.0 | 26.7 | 46.2 |
| Ware 1 (SP) | 15 | 9 | 1 | 0.2 | 4.0 | 22.3 | 3.2 | 12.0 | 32.3 | 1.4 | 8.0 | 27.5 | 7.6 | 20.0 | 41.3 |
| Ware 2 (DM) | 9 | 3 | - | 11.3 | 33.3 | 64.6 | 6.7 | 25.0 | 57.2 | 6.7 | 25.0 | 57.2 | 35.4 | 66.7 | 88.7 |
| Worth (RO) | 12 | 18 | 0 | 26.0 | 43.3 | 62.3 | 34.6 | 53.3 | 71.2 | 13.0 | 26.7 | 46.2 | 60.9 | 80.0 | 91.6 |
Pearson correlations (r) for fixed effect variables used in our modeling exercises.
First, we examined if the detection of Trueperella pyogenes on one mucosal layer was associated with higher chance of detecting it at other mucosal layers. White-tailed deer were sampled along the forehead, nose, and tongue for presence of T. pyogenes. The prevalence of T. pyogenes on these mucosal layers across deer sampled at each site was used as predictor variables in subsequent modeling exercises to determine if associations with increased risk of cranial abscess disease at the site level. We then ensured no collinearity between the age and gender. No variables were significantly correlated enough to be excluded from being in the same model (cutoff of r = ± 0.70).
| r | df | t value | Pr(>|t|) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Head*Tongue | 0.39 | 27 | 2.18 | 0.04 |
| Head*Nose | 0.38 | 27 | 2.11 | 0.04 |
| Nose*Tongue | 0.63 | 27 | 4.22 | <0.01 |
| Age*Gender | -0.17 | 525 | -3.85 | <0.01 |
Akaike information criteria with small sample bias adjustment (AICc); number of parameters (K), ΔAICc, Akaike weights (w) for candidate models (i) relating prevalence of detecting Trueperella pyogenes on the mucosal surfaces of deer to the occurrence of cranial abscess disease at 29 sites across Georgia, USA in 2011–2012.
The detection of T. pyogenes on any mucosal surface (overall detection) has the lowest AICc score.
| Model structure and description | K | AICc | ΔAICc |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| O | 2 | 37.69 | 0.00 | 0.25 |
| N | 2 | 37.80 | 0.11 | 0.23 |
| N + H | 3 | 38.61 | 0.92 | 0.15 |
| H | 2 | 39.16 | 1.47 | 0.12 |
| T | 2 | 40.01 | 2.32 | 0.08 |
| N + T | 3 | 40.13 | 2.44 | 0.07 |
| H + T | 3 | 40.48 | 2.79 | 0.06 |
| N + H + T | 4 | 41.30 | 3.61 | 0.04 |
a Models correspond to prevalence of T. pyogenes on: O = overall (i.e., detection at any of the three dermal linings sampled), H = Forehead, N = Nasal, T = Tongue.
bNumber of estimating parameters in approximating model.
c Models with ΔAICc ≤ 2 were considered good candidates for explaining patterns in field data, models with ΔAICc 2–7 had little support, and models with ΔAICc > 10 had relatively no support.
dAkaike weight.
Parameter estimates (logit scale) for a model of the risk of an individual white-tailed deer testing positive for Trueperella pyogenes on A) overall (detection at any of the three dermal linings sampled), B) head, C) nose, and D) tongue.
Standard errors (SE), z values, and probabilities that a coefficient differs from 0 are also presented. Age and gender data was available for 527 deer across 26 sites. Residual degrees of freedom was 522 for all models.
| Covariate | Estimate | Coefficient (SE) | z value | Pr(>|z|) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | Intercept | -0.61 | 0.42 | -0.15 | 0.89 |
| Age | -0.56 | 0.11 | -0.53 | 0.60 | |
| Gender | -0.32 | 0.49 | -0.67 | 0.51 | |
| Age*Gender | 0.21 | 0.14 | 1.48 | 0.14 | |
| Site1 | 0.57 | - | - | - | |
| Head | Intercept | -2.23 | 0.57 | -3.88 | <0.01 |
| Age | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.88 | 0.38 | |
| Gender | 1.20 | 0.63 | 1.91 | 0.05 | |
| Age*Gender | -0.19 | 0.17 | -1.12 | 0.26 | |
| Site1 | 1.25 | - | - | - | |
| Nose | Intercept | -0.70 | 0.45 | -1.55 | 0.12 |
| Age | -0.09 | 0.11 | -0.77 | 0.43 | |
| Gender | -1.39 | 0.55 | -2.52 | 0.01 | |
| Age*Gender | 0.37 | 0.16 | 2.33 | 0.02 | |
| Site1 | 0.76 | - | - | - | |
| Tongue | Intercept | -1.98 | 0.56 | 3.51 | <0.01 |
| Age | -0.03 | 0.16 | 0.20 | 0.84 | |
| Gender | -0.11 | 0.67 | 0.16 | 0.87 | |
| Age*Gender | 0.16 | 0.19 | 0.83 | 0.41 | |
| Site1 | 0.06 | - | - | - |
1 Site was considered a random effect in the model. Thus, it is a variance estimate.
Parameter estimates (logit scale) for a model of the risk of an individual white-tailed deer testing positive for Trueperella pyogenes on the head for sites with cranial abscess disease (CAD) and sites without cranial abscess disease.
Standard errors (SE), z values, and probabilities that a coefficient differs from 0 are also presented. 218 deer of known age and gender from 10 sites with cranial abscesses and 309 deer from 16 sites without cranial abscesses were included in the respective models. Residual degrees of freedom was 213 for the “with CAD” model and 304 for the “without CAD” model.
| Covariate | Estimate | Coefficient (SE) | z value | Pr(>|z|) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| With CAD | Intercept | -2.53 | 1.04 | -2.44 | 0.01 |
| Age | 0.16 | 0.23 | 0.69 | 0.49 | |
| Gender | 2.43 | 1.17 | 2.07 | 0.04 | |
| Age*Gender | -0.28 | 0.28 | -1.01 | 0.31 | |
| Site1 | 1.53 | - | - | - | |
| Without CAD | Intercept | -2.19 | 0.68 | -3.22 | <0.01 |
| Age | 0.10 | 0.17 | 0.62 | 0.54 | |
| Gender | 1.04 | 0.78 | 1.34 | 0.18 | |
| Age*Gender | -0.33 | 0.24 | -1.37 | 0.17 | |
| Site1 | 0.90 | - | - | - |
1 Site was considered a random effect in the model. Thus, it is a variance estimate.