| Literature DB >> 25802881 |
Susanne Thiele1, Ralf Werner1, Joachim Grötzinger2, Bettina Brix1, Pia Staedt1, Dagmar Struve1, Benedikt Reiz3, Jennane Farida4, Olaf Hiort1.
Abstract
Maternally inherited inactivating GNAS mutations are the most common cause of parathyroid hormone (PTH) resistance and Albright hereditary osteodystrophy (AHO) leading to pseudohypoparathyroidism type Ia (PHPIa) due to Gsα deficiency. Paternally inherited inactivating mutations lead to isolated AHO signs characterizing pseudo-pseudohypoparathyroidism (PPHP). Mutations are distributed throughout the Gsα coding exons of GNAS and there is a lack of genotype-phenotype correlation. In this study, we sequenced exon 1-13 of GNAS in a large cohort of PHPIa- and PPHP patients and identified 58 different mutations in 88 patients and 27 relatives. Thirty-three mutations including 15 missense mutations were newly discovered. Furthermore, we found three hot spots: a known hotspot (p.D190MfsX14), a second at codon 166 (p.R166C), and a third at the exon 5 acceptor splice site (c.435 + 1G>A), found in 15, 5, and 4 unrelated patients, respectively. Comparing the clinical features to the molecular genetic data, a significantly higher occurrence of subcutaneous calcifications in patients harboring truncating versus missense mutations was demonstrated. Thus, in the largest cohort of PHPIa patients described to date, we extend the spectrum of known GNAS mutations and hot spots and demonstrate for the first time a correlation between the genetic defects and the expression of a clinical AHO-feature.Entities:
Keywords: Albright hereditary osteodystrophy; G proteins; GNAS; Gsα; genotype–phenotype correlation; mutation; pseudohypoparathyroidism
Year: 2014 PMID: 25802881 PMCID: PMC4367083 DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.117
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Genet Genomic Med ISSN: 2324-9269 Impact factor: 2.183
Results of statistical analysis of clinical AHO features in PHPIa patients harboring missense versus truncating mutations.
| Clinical sign | Missense mutations (n = 33) | Truncating mutations (n = 31) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brachymetacarpia | 30 (90.9%) | 19 (61.3%) | 5.2e-03 |
| Obesity | 22 (66.7%) | 24 (77.4%) | 3.4e-01 |
| Mental retardation | 16 (48.5%) | 19 (61.3%) | 3.0e-01 |
| Short stature | 15 (45.4%) | 8 (25.8%) | 1.0e-01 |
| Subcutaneous calcifications | 2 (6.1%) | 19 (61.2%) | 2.6e-06 |
Result of statistical analysis of PHPIa patients comparing the occurrence of clinical signs in patients harboring missense mutations versus truncating mutations (n: numbers of patients). The occurrence of brachymetacarpia and subcutaneous calcifications is significantly different between both types of mutations.
Figure 1Localization of the 15 newly identified missense mutations and mutation R166C based on the structure of Gsα. (A) Scheme of the Gsα protein, its functional domains and relative locations of the newly identified missense mutations. Blue bars represent the α-helical domain, orange bars the GTP-binding domain, and green bars the ras-like domain. SI to III (in red) represents the three switch domains. Class I amino acids are written in black, class II in red and class III in blue. The CADD score is included in brackets. (B) Three-dimensional ribbon representation of Gsα demonstrates the structural interaction between the different domains. The α-helical domain is colored in blue, the interswitch region in orange, and the ras-like domain in green, both domains connected by the three switch regions shown in red. The amino acids concerned by newly identified missense mutations are accentuated. Since the first part of the protein has not been resolved in the X-ray structure, L30 is not depicted in the picture.
Classification of newly identified missense mutations.
| Class | Affected amino acids |
|---|---|
| I | V118, L172, M222, F239, V248, A270, L283, F346 |
| II | R200, T205, E328 |
| III | R166, E169, E269, K294, E328 |
Affected amino acids of the newly identified missense mutations (and of the known mutation R166C) depending on the location of the amino acids. Class I amino acid residues are predicted to be involved in the hydrophobic core of the protein may lead to instability or even completely unfolding. Class II amino acid residues are involved in cofactor binding, while class III amino acid residues are involved in formation of salt bridges and mutations are also predicted to lead to instability of the protein structure.