| Literature DB >> 25802530 |
Joanna Sypecka1, Sylwia Koniusz1, Maria Kawalec2, Anna Sarnowska3.
Abstract
The objective of this paper is to describe in detail the method of organotypic longitudinal spinal cord slice culture and the scientific basis for its potential utility. The technique is based on the interface method, which was described previously and thereafter was modified in our laboratory. The most important advantage of the presented model is the preservation of the intrinsic spinal cord fiber tract and the ventrodorsal polarity of the spinal cord. All the processes occurring during axonal growth, regeneration, synapse formation, and myelination could be visualized while being cultured in vitro for up to 4-5 weeks after the slices had been isolated. Both pups and adult animals can undergo the same, equally efficient procedures when going by the protocol in question. The urgent need for an appropriate in vitro model for spinal cord regeneration results from a greater number of clinical trials concerning regenerative medicine in the spinal cord injury and from still insufficient knowledge of the molecular mechanisms involved in the neuroreparative processes. The detailed method of organotypic longitudinal spinal cord slice culture is accompanied by examples of its application to studying biological processes to which both the CNS inhabiting and grafted cells are subjected.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25802530 PMCID: PMC4329758 DOI: 10.1155/2015/471216
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stem Cells Int Impact factor: 5.443
Figure 1Illustration of sequential steps of organotypic spinal cord slices preparation. All needed for preparation tools (a) and the main steps of the spinal cord isolation were photographed. The incision of the entire spinal cord block from the dorsal side (b). Fixation with syringe needles spinal column (c). Progressive steps of spinal cord isolation (c1–3). The dissection of white spinal cords (d) and its magnification (d1). The transfer of spinal cord slices into the Millicell-CM (Millipore) membranes (e).
Figure 2Direct transplantation of HUCB-NSC into the spinal cord organotypic slice culture, an example of immunohistochemistry experiment. The cells were traced with CMFDA for their identification after engraftment. The transplanted cells (green) migrated inside the slice and spread out between the host neurons ((b); TUJ1, red). Three weeks after transplantation part of the transplanted cells expressed the astrocyte marker S100β ((c); red). The local immune response to xenografts was moderate ((d); ED1, red). Cell nuclei (blue) were stained with Hoechst 33258. Scale bar is 50 μm.
Figure 3Cocultivation of HUCB-NSC with the spinal cord organotypic slice culture, an example of immunohistochemistry experiment. The cells growing in the 6-well plates were cocultivated with SCC placed on the membranes inserted into wells (a), without a direct cell-to-cell contact with the slices. HUCB-NSC seeded at the beginning of the experiment at the same density proliferated faster in the vicinity of SCC ((b)-(c)). Moreover, their morphology was more ramified and the observed TUJ1 expression was higher than that in the control ((d)-(e)). Cell nuclei (blue) were visualized by staining with Hoechst 33258. Scale bar corresponds to 50 μm.
Figure 4The intrinsic spinal cord axons forming a fiber tract. Two weeks after SCC preparation the anatomy of cultured slices was visualized by live imaging in light converted microscope (a) and by immunohistochemical analysis using neuronal and astrocytes markers ((b)–(d)). The scale bar is the equivalent of 200 μm.
Figure 5Possible applications of spinal cord organotypic slice culture. Spinal cord tissue after both direct and indirect cocultures with stem cells could be analyzed with immunohistochemical and molecular (PCR, Western-blot, ELISA, chromatography, and spectroscopy) methods.
Troubleshooting: the most frequent problems in preparing and maintaining the organotypic longitudinal spinal cord slice culture, their probable reasons, and their proposed solutions.
| Problems | Possible reason | Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| Spinal cord destroyed during chopping | The tissue is too soft | All the procedures must be done on ice and the chopper table should be chilled before cutting |
| The blade cuts too fast and tears the tissue up | The blade speed should be approximately adjusted to make a single cut every single second | |
| The blade does not stick closely to the chopper table | Make sure that the blade tightly sticks to the chopper table | |
|
| ||
| Aberrant axonal projections | The spinal cord is not placed in a parallel-to-the-blade fashion | Before cutting check whether the spinal cord is set parallel to the blade. |
|
| ||
| Slices die after 1 week | Incorrect pH of the medium | pH must be adjusted to 7.2 each time the medium is changed |
| The precutting procedure takes too much time | The whole procedure should not take more than 90 min (from decapitating animals up to placing the slices onto the membrane) | |
|
| ||
| Transplanted cells die after short time | The density of the transplanted cells is too high | Try different amount of cells |
| The cells are not evenly suspended | Before transplantation mix cells in eppendorf with pipette gently but precisely | |
|
| ||
| Slices and cells detach from the membrane during fixation | PFA was old or too cold | After preparing PFA solution do not freeze the preused doses and before fixation heat PFA up to 37°C |
|
| ||
| Slices are not evenly stained | The permeabilization is too weak or too short | Add Triton-X 0.2% to the primary antibody solution |
| The slice was not completely covered with liquid | Using a brush or tips let the slice gently sink to the bottom of the well; it should stay there during entire staining procedure | |
|
| ||
| The slice structure is destroyed during slide closing | The coverslip is too heavy and crushes are rich in lipids structure | Add a double portion of mounting medium and wait a while until it dries a little before applying coverslips |
Figure 6Local tissue (spinal cord versus hippocampus) significantly influences cell commitment, differentiation, and maturation, as observed during 7-day-long coculture experiments. The vicinity of hippocampal slices (right panel) promotes neuronal commitment and maturation (TUJ1) (D) and accelerates oligodendroglial differentiation into cells characterized by complex, multibranched morphology (GalC) (H). Conversely, in medium conditioned by the spinal cords slices (left panel), the progenitor and immature forms of oligodendrocytes are most abundant (NG2, O4) ((A), (E)), while GalC-positive cells begin to send out cell processes (G). Cell nuclei (blue) were stained with Hoechst 33258. Scale bar = 50 μm.