Allison R Butts1, Victoria T Brown2, Lauren D McBride2, Javier Bolaños-Meade3, Amy W Bryk2. 1. Department of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky HealthCare, Lexington, USA arbu223@uky.edu. 2. Department of Pharmacy, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, USA. 3. The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to analyze the initial tacrolimus concentrations achieved in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients using the institutional dosing strategy of 1 mg IV daily initiated on day +5. The secondary objectives were to ascertain the tacrolimus dose, days of therapy, and dose changes necessary to achieve a therapeutic concentration, and to identify patient-specific factors that influence therapeutic dose. The relationships between the number of pre-therapeutic days and incidence of graft-versus-host disease and graft failure were delineated. METHODS: A retrospective chart review included adult allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell patients who received tacrolimus for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis in 2012. Descriptive statistics, linear and logistic regression, and graphical analyses were utilized. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients met the inclusion criteria. The first concentration was subtherapeutic (<10 ng/ml) in 97 patients (98%). The median number of days of tacrolimus needed to achieve a therapeutic trough was 10 with a median of two dose changes. The median therapeutic dose was 1.6 mg IV daily. Approximately 75% of patients became therapeutic on ≤ 2 mg IV tacrolimus daily. No relationship was found between therapeutic dose and any patient-specific factor tested, including weight. No relationship was found between the number of days of therapy required to achieve a therapeutic trough and incidence of graft-versus-host disease or graft failure. CONCLUSION: An initial flat tacrolimus dose of 1 mg IV daily is a suboptimal approach to achieve therapeutic levels at this institution. A dose of 1.6 mg or 2 mg IV daily is a reasonable alternative to the current institutional practice.
OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to analyze the initial tacrolimus concentrations achieved in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients using the institutional dosing strategy of 1 mg IV daily initiated on day +5. The secondary objectives were to ascertain the tacrolimus dose, days of therapy, and dose changes necessary to achieve a therapeutic concentration, and to identify patient-specific factors that influence therapeutic dose. The relationships between the number of pre-therapeutic days and incidence of graft-versus-host disease and graft failure were delineated. METHODS: A retrospective chart review included adult allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell patients who received tacrolimus for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis in 2012. Descriptive statistics, linear and logistic regression, and graphical analyses were utilized. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients met the inclusion criteria. The first concentration was subtherapeutic (<10 ng/ml) in 97 patients (98%). The median number of days of tacrolimus needed to achieve a therapeutic trough was 10 with a median of two dose changes. The median therapeutic dose was 1.6 mg IV daily. Approximately 75% of patients became therapeutic on ≤ 2 mg IV tacrolimus daily. No relationship was found between therapeutic dose and any patient-specific factor tested, including weight. No relationship was found between the number of days of therapy required to achieve a therapeutic trough and incidence of graft-versus-host disease or graft failure. CONCLUSION: An initial flat tacrolimus dose of 1 mg IV daily is a suboptimal approach to achieve therapeutic levels at this institution. A dose of 1.6 mg or 2 mg IV daily is a reasonable alternative to the current institutional practice.
Authors: Smita Bhatia; Liton Francisco; Andrea Carter; Can-Lan Sun; K Scott Baker; James G Gurney; Philip B McGlave; Auayporn Nademanee; Margaret O'Donnell; Norma K C Ramsay; Leslie L Robison; David Snyder; Anthony Stein; Stephen J Forman; Daniel J Weisdorf Journal: Blood Date: 2007-08-01 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: G W Boswell; I Bekersky; J Fay; J Wingard; J Antin; D Weisdorf; R Maher; W Fitzsimmons; R Nash Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 1998-01 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: Stephanie J Lee; John P Klein; A John Barrett; Olle Ringden; Joseph H Antin; Jean-Yves Cahn; Matthew H Carabasi; Robert Peter Gale; Sergio Giralt; Gregory A Hale; Osman Ilhan; Philip L McCarthy; Gerard Socie; Leo F Verdonck; Daniel J Weisdorf; Mary M Horowitz Journal: Blood Date: 2002-07-15 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Leo Luznik; Paul V O'Donnell; Heather J Symons; Allen R Chen; M Susan Leffell; Marianna Zahurak; Ted A Gooley; Steve Piantadosi; Michele Kaup; Richard F Ambinder; Carol Ann Huff; William Matsui; Javier Bolaños-Meade; Ivan Borrello; Jonathan D Powell; Elizabeth Harrington; Sandy Warnock; Mary Flowers; Robert A Brodsky; Brenda M Sandmaier; Rainer F Storb; Richard J Jones; Ephraim J Fuchs Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: J R Wingard; R A Nash; D Przepiorka; J L Klein; D J Weisdorf; J W Fay; J Zhu; R M Maher; W E Fitzsimmons; V Ratanatharathorn Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 1998 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Jordan T Brooks; Ron J Keizer; Janel R Long-Boyle; Sandhya Kharbanda; Christopher C Dvorak; Brian D Friend Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2021-12-07 Impact factor: 5.810