| Literature DB >> 25801349 |
Sanjay Kalra1, Yashdeep Gupta.
Abstract
Coformulations are a novel pharmaceutical development in diabetology. They are composed of two medicinal products, both of which maintain their distinct pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. Currently available coformulations include combinations of basal and rapid-acting insulin, and basal and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1RA). This review describes three coformulations which are in advanced stages of development, or are approved in certain markets. We discuss the basic and clinical pharmacology of these drugs, while describing clinical usage of the commercially available insulin degludec aspart (IDegAsp).Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25801349 PMCID: PMC4478180 DOI: 10.1007/s13300-015-0106-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diabetes Ther Impact factor: 2.945
Coformulation versus pre-mixed preparation
| Characteristic | Coformulation | Pre-mixed preparation |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Formulation of two separate components, which maintain distinct identity | Mixture of two components, which are unable to maintain distinct identity |
| Appearance | Clear | Cloudy |
| Proportion | Pre-determined | Pre-determined |
| Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics | Both components maintain distinct PK/PD profiles | PK/PD profile of both components may merge |
| Efficacy | Both components achieve efficacy at targeted endpoint | Both components often achieve targeted end points |
| Scope | Allows coformulation of separate classes of drugs | Does not allow mixing of different classes of drugs |
| Examples | Insulin degludec + insulin aspart; insulin degludec + liraglutide; insulin glargine + lixisenatide | Biphasic human insulin; biphasic insulin aspart; biphasic insulin lispro |
PD pharmacodynamics, PK pharmacokinetics
Receptor binding and metabolic and mitogenic properties of insulin aspart and insulin degludec
| Human insulin | Insulin degludec | Insulin aspart | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Insulin receptor affinity | 100% | 13–15% | 92% |
| IGF receptor affinity | 100% | 2% | 81% |
| Metabolic potency | 100% | 8–20% | 101% |
| Mitogenic potency | 100% | 4–14% | 58% |
| Mitogenic/metabolic potency ratio | 1 | <1 | <1 |
Phase 3 trial programs investigating IDegAsp in T1DM and T2DM
| Population ( | IDegAsp dosing time | Weeks | Non-inferior HbA1C control | ETD of FPG (mmol/L) | Confirmed hypoglycemia | Nocturnal hypoglycemia |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1DM: IDegAsp OD + IAsp at remaining meals versus IDet (OD/BD) + IAsp at time of meals (548) [ | Any main meal | 26 | IDegAsp non-inferior to IDet + IAsp | 0.23 | 9% Lower with IDegAsp (ns) | 37% Lower with IDegAsp ( |
| T2DM: IDegAsp OD with major meal versus IGlar OD (Japan) (296) [ | Any main meal | 26 | IDegAsp OD decreased HbA1C significantly more than IGlar OD ( | 0.15 | 27% Lower with IDegAsp (ns) | 25% Lower with IDegAsp (ns) |
| T2DM: IDegAsp BID versus BiAsp 30 BID (intensify pre-mix 1) (446) [ | With two major meals | 26 | IDegAsp non-inferior to BiAsp 30 | −1.14 ( | 32% Lower with IDegAsp ( | 73% Lower with IDegAsp ( |
| T2DM: IDegAsp BID versus BiAsp 30 BID (intensify pre-mix in all) (424) [ | With two major meals | 26 | IDegAsp non-inferior to BiAsp 30 | −1.06 ( | No significant difference | 33% Lower with IDegAsp (ns) |
| T2DM: IDegAsp BID versus BB regimen with OD IDeg with IAsp 2–4 times a day (274) [ | With two major meals | 26 | IDegAsp did not achieve non-inferiority | −0.5 | 19% Lower with IDegAsp BID (ns) | 20% Lower with IDegAsp BID (ns) |
BB basal bolus, BiAsp biphasic insulin aspart 30/70, BID twice daily, ETD estimated treatment difference, FPG fasting plasma glucose, HbA1C glycated hemoglobin, IAsp insulin aspart, IDeg insulin degludec, IDegAsp insulin degludec aspart, ns not significant, IDet Insulin detemir, IGlar insulin glargine, OD once daily, T1DM type 1 diabetes mellitus, T2DM type 2 diabetes mellitus
DUAL I and DUAL II clinical trial program
| Population | Number of weeks | Non-inferior HbA1C | Other important points regarding confirmed hypoglycemia and weight change |
|---|---|---|---|
| DUAL I: T2DM: IDegLira OD versus insulin degludec OD versus liraglutide OD ( | 26 | Mean HbA1C decreased by 1.9% with IDegLira, by 1.4% with insulin degludec, and by 1.3% with liraglutide. IDegLira was non-inferior to insulin degludec ( | 36% Of patients on IDegLira, 14% of patients on insulin degludec and 52% of patients on liraglutide achieved HbA1C levels of <7% without any weight gain and hypoglycemia Number of confirmed hypoglycemic events per patient year was 1.8 for IDegLira, 2.6 for insulin degludec and 0.2 for liraglutide |
| DUAL II: T2DM: IDegLira OD + metformin versus IDeg OD + metformin ( | 26 | Superior HbA1C reduction with IDegLira by 1.9% versus 0.9% by insulin degludec ( | Mean weight change of 2.7 kg with IDegLira versus no weight change with insulin degludec, ( Comparable incidence of confirmed hypoglycemia was seen in 24% of patients on IDegLira versus 25% of patients on insulin degludec |
HbA1C glycated hemoglobin, IDegLira insulin degludec liraglutide, OD once daily
GetGoal clinical trial program
| Study design ( | Weeks | Non-inferior HbA1C | Other important points regarding confirmed hypoglycemia and weight change |
|---|---|---|---|
| GetGoal Duo 1 [ | 24 | Adding lixisenatide to insulin glargine further reduced HbA1C by 0.71% versus 0.40% with placebo ( More participants attained HbA1C 7% with lixisenatide (56% versus 39%; | Lixisenatide reduced 2 h PPG more than placebo ( Lixisenatide had a favorable effect on body weight (−0.89 kg compared to placebo; Nausea, vomiting, and symptomatic hypoglycemia (3.3 mmol/L) were more common with lixisenatide |
| GetGoal-M [ | 24 | From a baseline HbA1C of 8.1%, administration of lixisenatide led to a decrease of −0.9% (morning injection) and −0.8% (evening injection) versus −0.4% with placebo (primary end point) at 24 weeks | Mild and transient nausea and vomiting were the most commonly reported and only notable treatment emergent adverse events Hypoglycemia frequency was slightly higher in the lixisenatide groups versus placebo, but remained low with no cases of severe hypoglycemia |
| GetGoal-L [ | 24 | Lixisenatide significantly reduced HbA1C by −0.7 ± 0.1% versus −0.4 ± 0.1% with placebo at 24 weeks ( | Lixisenatide reduced body weight compared with placebo ( Incidence of symptomatic hypoglycemia was comparable (27.7% for lixisenatide versus 21.6% for placebo), whereas four cases of severe hypoglycemia occurred in the lixisenatide group compared to none in the placebo group |
| GetGoal-L-Asia [ | 24 | Lixisenatide significantly improved HbA1C by −0.88% compared to placebo ( | There was a trend in weight decreases in patients treated with lixisenatide, with no statistically significant differences between lixisenatide and placebo Symptomatic hypoglycemia was similar in patients not receiving sulfonylureas, but was more frequent with lixisenatide versus placebo (32.6 versus 28.3%) |
PPG postprandial plasma glucose
Comparison of IDegLira and IGlarLixi
| IDegLira | IGlarLixi | |
|---|---|---|
| Components | Combination of insulin degludec (basal insulin with a half-life of 25 h and duration of action >42 h), and liraglutide (GLP1RA analog with half-life of 13 h and OD dosing) | Combination of insulin glargine (basal insulin with a half-life of 12.5 h and duration of action 24 h), and lixisenatide (a short acting GLP1RA analog with a half-life of 2.6 h and OD dosing) |
| Phase 3 program | Completed | Completed |
| Approval status | Approved by European Medical Agency for the European Market | Not yet approved |
GLP1RA glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist, IDegLira insulin degludec and liraglutide, IGlarLixi insulin glargine and lixisenatide