Literature DB >> 25801047

Clinical Outcomes After Anatomic Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Comparison of Extreme Knee Hyperextension and Normal to Mild Knee Hyperextension.

Kenichi Saito1, Kazuhisa Hatayama2, Masanori Terauchi3, Keiichi Hagiwara3, Hiroshi Higuchi4, Kenji Takagishi5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare postoperative outcomes after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) in extreme knee hyperextension versus normal to mild knee hyperextension.
METHODS: For 100 patients who underwent anatomic double-bundle ACLR using semitendinosus tendon, we evaluated the side-to-side difference (SSD) in anterior tibial translation (measured on stress radiographs) and rotational stability (assessed by the pivot-shift test) 2 years after surgery. Loss of extension (LOE) was evaluated on lateral radiographs of both knees in full extension, and graft integrity was assessed during second-look arthroscopy 1 to 2 years after surgery. In accordance with the Beighton and Honan criteria, patients with an extension angle less than or equal to 10° in the contralateral uninjured knee composed the group with 10° or less hyperextension (N group), and those with an extension angle of greater than 10° composed the group with more than 10° hyperextension (H group). Postoperative results were compared between these groups.
RESULTS: Mean extension angles in the N and H groups were 5.8° ± 2.9° and 14.7° ± 3.0°, respectively. The mean SSD in anterior translation was 2.2 ± 2.9 mm for the N group and 2.8 ± 2.9 mm for the H group, with no significant difference. The positive ratios on the pivot-shift test were not significantly different between the groups. Mean LOE in the N and H groups was -0.7° ± 3.7° and 1.3° ± 3.3°, respectively, with a significant difference (P = .007). During second-look arthroscopy, 6 of 58 knees in the N group and 13 of 42 knees in the H group had superficial graft laceration of the anteromedial bundle graft, with a significant difference (P = .01) seen between groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Anatomic double-bundle ACLR for extreme knee hyperextension may attain the same postoperative anterior and rotational stability as seen in knees with normal to mild hyperextension. However, it increased superficial graft laceration. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.
Copyright © 2015 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25801047     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.01.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  6 in total

1.  Knee hyperextension does not adversely affect dynamic in vivo kinematics after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Kanto Nagai; Tom Gale; Elmar Herbst; Yasutaka Tashiro; James J Irrgang; Scott Tashman; Freddie H Fu; William Anderst
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-07-15       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Physiologic Preoperative Knee Hyperextension Is a Predictor of Failure in an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision Cohort: A Report From the MARS Group.

Authors:  Daniel E Cooper; Warren R Dunn; Laura J Huston; Amanda K Haas; Kurt P Spindler; Christina R Allen; Allen F Anderson; Thomas M DeBerardino; Brett Brick A Lantz; Barton Mann; Michael J Stuart; John P Albright; Annunziato Ned Amendola; Jack T Andrish; Christopher C Annunziata; Robert A Arciero; Bernard R Bach; Champ L Baker; Arthur R Bartolozzi; Keith M Baumgarten; Jeffery R Bechler; Jeffrey H Berg; Geoffrey A Bernas; Stephen F Brockmeier; Robert H Brophy; Charles A Bush-Joseph; J Brad Butler V; John D Campbell; James L Carey; James E Carpenter; Brian J Cole; Jonathan M Cooper; Charles L Cox; R Alexander Creighton; Diane L Dahm; Tal S David; David C Flanigan; Robert W Frederick; Theodore J Ganley; Elizabeth A Garofoli; Charles J Gatt; Steven R Gecha; James Robert Giffin; Sharon L Hame; Jo A Hannafin; Christopher D Harner; Norman Lindsay Harris; Keith S Hechtman; Elliott B Hershman; Rudolf G Hoellrich; Timothy M Hosea; David C Johnson; Timothy S Johnson; Morgan H Jones; Christopher C Kaeding; Ganesh V Kamath; Thomas E Klootwyk; Bruce A Levy; C Benjamin Ma; G Peter Maiers; Robert G Marx; Matthew J Matava; Gregory M Mathien; David R McAllister; Eric C McCarty; Robert G McCormack; Bruce S Miller; Carl W Nissen; Daniel F O'Neill; Brett D Owens; Richard D Parker; Mark L Purnell; Arun J Ramappa; Michael A Rauh; Arthur C Rettig; Jon K Sekiya; Kevin G Shea; Orrin H Sherman; James R Slauterbeck; Matthew V Smith; Jeffrey T Spang; Steven J Svoboda; Timothy N Taft; Joachim J Tenuta; Edwin M Tingstad; Armando F Vidal; Darius G Viskontas; Richard A White; James S Williams; Michelle L Wolcott; Brian R Wolf; James J York; Rick W Wright
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Risk factors for residual pivot shift after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: data from the MAKS group.

Authors:  Hiroko Ueki; Yusuke Nakagawa; Toshiyuki Ohara; Toshifumi Watanabe; Masafumi Horie; Hiroki Katagiri; Koji Otabe; Kenta Katagiri; Kanehiro Hiyama; Mai Katakura; Takashi Hoshino; Kei Inomata; Naoko Araya; Ichiro Sekiya; Takeshi Muneta; Hideyuki Koga
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  The Impact of Osseous Malalignment and Realignment Procedures in Knee Ligament Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Clinical Evidence.

Authors:  Thomas Tischer; Jochen Paul; Dietrich Pape; Michael T Hirschmann; Andreas B Imhoff; Stefan Hinterwimmer; Matthias J Feucht
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-03-27

5.  Knee Hyperextension Greater Than 5° Is a Risk Factor for Failure in ACL Reconstruction Using Hamstring Graft.

Authors:  Tales Mollica Guimarães; Pedro Nogueira Giglio; Marcel Faraco Sobrado; Marcelo Batista Bonadio; Riccardo Gomes Gobbi; José Ricardo Pécora; Camilo Partezani Helito
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-11-17

6.  Predictors of Graft Failure in Young Active Patients Undergoing Hamstring Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With or Without a Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis: The Stability Experience.

Authors:  Andrew D Firth; Dianne M Bryant; Robert Litchfield; Robert G McCormack; Mark Heard; Peter B MacDonald; Tim Spalding; Peter C M Verdonk; Devin Peterson; Davide Bardana; Alex Rezansoff; Alan M J Getgood; Kevin Willits; Trevor Birmingham; Chris Hewison; Stacey Wanlin; Ryan Pinto; Ashley Martindale; Lindsey O'Neill; Morgan Jennings; Michal Daniluk; Dory Boyer; Mauri Zomar; Karyn Moon; Raely Moon; Brenda Fan; Bindu Mohan; Gregory M Buchko; Laurie A Hiemstra; Sarah Kerslake; Jeremy Tynedal; Greg Stranges; Sheila Mcrae; LeeAnne Gullett; Holly Brown; Alexandra Legary; Alison Longo; Mat Christian; Celeste Ferguson; Nick Mohtadi; Rhamona Barber; Denise Chan; Caitlin Campbell; Alexandra Garven; Karen Pulsifer; Michelle Mayer; Nicole Simunovic; Andrew Duong; David Robinson; David Levy; Matt Skelly; Ajaykumar Shanmugaraj; Fiona Howells; Murray Tough; Pete Thompson; Andrew Metcalfe; Laura Asplin; Alisen Dube; Louise Clarkson; Jaclyn Brown; Alison Bolsover; Carolyn Bradshaw; Larissa Belgrove; Francis Milan; Sylvia Turner; Sarah Verdugo; Janet Lowe; Debra Dunne; Kerri McGowan; Charlie-Marie Suddens; Geert Declerq; Kristien Vuylsteke; Mieke Van Haver
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 6.202

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.