Literature DB >> 25801028

The 3D organization of chromatin explains evolutionary fragile genomic regions.

Camille Berthelot, Matthieu Muffato, Judith Abecassis, Hugues Roest Crollius.   

Abstract

Genomic rearrangements are a major source of evolutionary divergence in eukaryotic genomes, a cause of genetic diseases and a hallmark of tumor cell progression, yet the mechanisms underlying their occurrence and evolutionary fixation are poorly understood. Statistical associations between breakpoints and specific genomic features suggest that genomes may contain elusive “fragile regions” with a higher propensity for breakage. Here, we use ancestral genome reconstructions to demonstrate a near-perfect correlation between gene density and evolutionary rearrangement breakpoints. Simulations based on functional features in the human genome show that this pattern is best explained as the outcome of DNA breaks that occur in open chromatin regions coming into 3D contact in the nucleus. Our model explains how rearrangements reorganize the order of genes in an evolutionary neutral fashion and provides a basis for understanding the susceptibility of “fragile regions” to breakage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25801028     DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.02.046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Rep            Impact factor:   9.423


  27 in total

1.  Reconstruction and evolutionary history of eutherian chromosomes.

Authors:  Jaebum Kim; Marta Farré; Loretta Auvil; Boris Capitanu; Denis M Larkin; Jian Ma; Harris A Lewin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Organization and function of the 3D genome.

Authors:  Boyan Bonev; Giacomo Cavalli
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  3D organization of chicken genome demonstrates evolutionary conservation of topologically associated domains and highlights unique architecture of erythrocytes' chromatin.

Authors:  Veniamin Fishman; Nariman Battulin; Miroslav Nuriddinov; Antonina Maslova; Anna Zlotina; Anton Strunov; Darya Chervyakova; Alexey Korablev; Oleg Serov; Alla Krasikova
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Chromosome organization affects genome evolution in Sulfolobus archaea.

Authors:  Catherine Badel; Rachel Y Samson; Stephen D Bell
Journal:  Nat Microbiol       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 30.964

Review 5.  A TAD Skeptic: Is 3D Genome Topology Conserved?

Authors:  Ittai E Eres; Yoav Gilad
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2020-11-14       Impact factor: 11.639

6.  Breaking Good: Accounting for Fragility of Genomic Regions in Rearrangement Distance Estimation.

Authors:  Priscila Biller; Laurent Guéguen; Carole Knibbe; Eric Tannier
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2016-05-22       Impact factor: 3.416

Review 7.  Chromatin Biology Impacts Adaptive Evolution of Filamentous Plant Pathogens.

Authors:  Michael F Seidl; David E Cook; Bart P H J Thomma
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 6.823

8.  Probabilistic modeling of the evolution of gene synteny within reconciled phylogenies.

Authors:  Magali Semeria; Eric Tannier; Laurent Guéguen
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Chromosome Architecture and Genome Organization.

Authors:  Giorgio Bernardi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Transcriptional Interference Promotes Rapid Expression Divergence of Drosophila Nested Genes.

Authors:  Raquel Assis
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2016-10-23       Impact factor: 3.416

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.