Literature DB >> 25800938

Sexual, marital, and general life functioning in couples coping with colorectal cancer: a dyadic study across time.

Marjan J Traa1, Johan Braeken2,3, Jolanda De Vries1,4, Jan A Roukema1,5, Gerrit D Slooter1,6, Rogier M P H Crolla7, Monique P M Borremans8, Brenda L Den Oudsten1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the following: (a) levels of sexual, marital, and general life functioning for both patients and partners; (b) interdependence between both members of the couple; and (c) longitudinal change in sexual, marital, and general life functioning and longitudinal stress-spillover effects in these three domains from a dyadic perspective.
METHODS: Couples (n = 102) completed the Maudsley Marital Questionnaire preoperatively and 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Mean scores were compared with norm scores. A multivariate general linear model and a multivariate latent difference score - structural equation modeling (LDS-SEM), which took into account actor and partner effects, were evaluated.
RESULTS: Patients and partners reported lower sexual, mostly similar marital, and higher general life functioning compared with norm scores. Moderate to high within-dyad associations were found. The LDS-SEM model mostly showed actor effects. Yet the longitudinal change in the partners' sexual functioning was determined not only by their own preoperative sexual functioning but also by that of the patient. Preoperative sexual functioning did not spill over to the other two domains for patients and partners, whereas the patients' preoperative general life functioning influenced postoperative change in marital and sexual functioning. Health care professionals should examine potential sexual problems but have to be aware that these problems may not spill over to the marital and general life domains. In contrast, low functioning in the general life domain may spill over to the marital and sexual domains. The interdependence between patients and partners implies that a couple-based perspective (e.g., couple-based interventions/therapies) to coping with cancer is needed.
Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25800938     DOI: 10.1002/pon.3801

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychooncology        ISSN: 1057-9249            Impact factor:   3.894


  6 in total

1.  Sexual quality of life, body image distress, and psychosocial outcomes in colorectal cancer: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Jennifer Barsky Reese; Elizabeth Handorf; Jennifer A Haythornthwaite
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Factors associated with psychosocial adjustment in working-age colorectal cancer survivors: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Wenjie Zou; Yiheng Zhang; Lizhen Gong; Meng Zhang; Xiaoyu Wu; Jingyue Xie; Meifen Zhang
Journal:  Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2022-04-02

3.  The development and evaluation of a web-based complex intervention: The caring for couples coping with colorectal cancer "4Cs: CRC" program.

Authors:  Meizhen Chen; Jiali Gong; Qian Cao; Qiuping Li
Journal:  Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2022-03-09

Review 4.  The Dyadic Cancer Outcomes Framework: A general framework of the effects of cancer on patients and informal caregivers.

Authors:  Tess Thompson; Dana Ketcher; Tamryn F Gray; Erin E Kent
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  A feasibility study of an integrated couples-based supportive programme for Chinese couples living with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Xingjuan Luo; Jieyu Li; Qian Cao; Liya Sun; Ying Chen; Jie Zhao; Qiuping Li
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2020-11-26

6.  The Temporal Decline of Social Support among Colorectal Cancer Survivors: First Year Prospective Study.

Authors:  Chen Hong; Tian Jing-Lun; Cai Lin; Zeng Ben-Qiang; Zheng Shaojun; Tian Xiao-Bing; Zeng En-Quan
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.429

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.