Literature DB >> 25800381

Sentinel lymph node biopsy after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer: Are the current false negative rates acceptable?

D K Patten1, K E Zacharioudakis2, H Chauhan2, S J Cleator3, D J Hadjiminas4.   

Abstract

The advent of sentinel lymph node biopsy has revolutionised surgical management of axillary nodal disease in patients with breast cancer. Patients undergoing neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for large breast primary tumours may experience complete pathological response on a previously positive sentinel node whilst not eliminating the tumour from the other lymph nodes. Results from 2 large prospective cohort studies investigating sentinel lymph node biopsy after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy demonstrate a combined false negative rate of 12.6-14.2% and identification rate of 80-89% with the minimal acceptable false negative rate and identification rate being set at 10% and 90%, respectively. A false negative rate of 14% would have been classified as unacceptable when compared to the figures obtained by the pioneers of sentinel lymph node biopsy which was 5% or less.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Axillary lymph node status; Breast cancer; Breast cancer diagnostics; Sentinel node biopsy

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25800381     DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2015.02.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast        ISSN: 0960-9776            Impact factor:   4.380


  5 in total

1.  Feasibility of Preoperative Axillary Lymph Node Marking with a Clip in Breast Cancer Patients Before Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Eun Young Kim; Woo Seok Byon; Kwan Ho Lee; Ji-Sup Yun; Yong Lai Park; Chan Heun Park; In Young Youn; Seon Hyeong Choi; Yoon Jung Choi; Shin Ho Kook; Sung-Im Do
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Sentinel node detection in muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer is feasible after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in all pT stages, a prospective multicenter report.

Authors:  Robert Rosenblatt; Markus Johansson; Farhood Alamdari; Alexander Sidiki; Benny Holmström; Johan Hansson; Janos Vasko; Per Marits; Susanne Gabrielsson; Katrine Riklund; Ola Winqvist; Amir Sherif
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  Assessment of sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer in two subgroups: Initially node negative and node positive converted to node negative - A systemic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alireza Shirzadi; Habibollah Mahmoodzadeh; Mostafa Qorbani
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 1.852

4.  Diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis for predicting response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy in breast cancer patients: A comparison with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, and full-field digital mammography.

Authors:  Ryusuke Murakami; Hitomi Tani; Shinichiro Kumita; Nachiko Uchiyama
Journal:  Acta Radiol Open       Date:  2021-12-20

5.  Comparison of nodal staging between CT, MRI, and [18F]-FDG PET/MRI in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer.

Authors:  Janna Morawitz; Nils-Martin Bruckmann; Frederic Dietzel; Tim Ullrich; Ann-Kathrin Bittner; Oliver Hoffmann; Eugen Ruckhäberle; Svjetlana Mohrmann; Lena Häberle; Marc Ingenwerth; Daniel Benjamin Abrar; Lino Morris Sawicki; Katharina Breuckmann; Wolfgang Peter Fendler; Ken Herrmann; Christian Buchbender; Gerald Antoch; Lale Umutlu; Julian Kirchner
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 9.236

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.