Literature DB >> 25800344

Oncological safety of breast cancer patients undergoing free-flap reconstruction and lipofilling.

J Masia1, D Bordoni2, G Pons1, C Liuzza1, F Castagnetti3, G Falco4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Autologous fat grafting is a widely accepted approach for breast reconstruction after mastectomy but its oncological safety has not been established. This study aimed to compare recurrence in patients who underwent fat-grafting procedures after autologous breast reconstruction and those who did not. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 207 consecutive patients, who underwent mastectomy and reconstruction using free flap surgery. We divide them in two groups: a study group of patients who underwent fat grafting procedure and a control group of patients who did not. Outcome regarding local and regional recurrence was compared between the two groups. Particularly, we studied recurrences from primary surgery to baseline (first lipofilling) and from baseline to most recent follow-up.
RESULTS: Median follow-up was 60 months from surgery to baseline and 29 months from baseline to most recent follow-up. The overall observational period after mastectomy in the control group was 120 months. Local recurrence was observed in 6 patients from the study group, respectively 3 in the first observational period and 3 after the fat grafting procedure. The control group, as the study one, presented a total of 6 recurrences (p = 0.555; Hazard Ratio free flap and lipo vs only free flap: = 0.66; 95% CI 0.16-2.66).
CONCLUSIONS: We found no significant differences in recurrence between patients who underwent fat grafting and those who did not. These encouraging findings support previous results but larger series of patients are required to confirm long-term oncological safety in these procedures.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fat grafting; Free-flap; Recurrences

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25800344     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.02.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  9 in total

1.  Long-term Follow-up of Autologous Fat Transfer vs Conventional Breast Reconstruction and Association With Cancer Relapse in Patients With Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Todor Krastev; Arjen van Turnhout; Eline Vriens; Luc Smits; René van der Hulst
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 14.766

2.  Association of Fat Grafting With Patient-Reported Outcomes in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Katelyn G Bennett; Ji Qi; Hyungjin M Kim; Jennifer B Hamill; Edwin G Wilkins; Babak J Mehrara; Jeffrey H Kozlow
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 14.766

3.  Meta-analysis of the oncological safety of autologous fat transfer after breast cancer.

Authors:  T K Krastev; S J Schop; J Hommes; A A Piatkowski; E M Heuts; R R W J van der Hulst
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  The oncological safety of autologous fat grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rodrigo Goncalves; Bruna Salani Mota; Bruno Sobreira-Lima; Marcos Desidério Ricci; José Maria Soares; Alexandre Mendonça Munhoz; Edmund Chada Baracat; José Roberto Filassi
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  The prognosis outcomes of autologous fat transfer for breast reconstruction after breast cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.

Authors:  Daixiong Tian; Ying Chu; Ge Zhang; Dan Huang; Jialin Huang; Jin Zeng
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2022-07

6.  Autologous Fat Grafting Does Not Increase Risk of Oncologic Recurrence in the Reconstructed Breast.

Authors:  Krishna S Vyas; Ryan C DeCoster; Jack C Burns; Louis T Rodgers; Max A Shrout; James P Mercer; Cristin Coquillard; Adam J Dugan; Michael D Baratta; Brian D Rinker; Henry C Vasconez
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 1.763

Review 7.  Adipose-Derived Stem Cells in Novel Approaches to Breast Reconstruction: Their Suitability for Tissue Engineering and Oncological Safety.

Authors:  Niamh O'Halloran; Donald Courtney; Michael J Kerin; Aoife J Lowery
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2017-08-16

Review 8.  Oncoplastic Breast Consortium consensus conference on nipple-sparing mastectomy.

Authors:  Walter P Weber; Martin Haug; Christian Kurzeder; Vesna Bjelic-Radisic; Rupert Koller; Roland Reitsamer; Florian Fitzal; Jorge Biazus; Fabricio Brenelli; Cicero Urban; Régis Resende Paulinelli; Jens-Uwe Blohmer; Jörg Heil; Jürgen Hoffmann; Zoltan Matrai; Giuseppe Catanuto; Viviana Galimberti; Oreste Gentilini; Mitchel Barry; Tal Hadar; Tanir M Allweis; Oded Olsha; Maria João Cardoso; Pedro F Gouveia; Isabel T Rubio; Jana de Boniface; Tor Svensjö; Susanne Bucher; Peter Dubsky; Jian Farhadi; Mathias K Fehr; Ilario Fulco; Ursula Ganz-Blättler; Andreas Günthert; Yves Harder; Nik Hauser; Elisabeth A Kappos; Michael Knauer; Julia Landin; Robert Mechera; Francesco Meani; Giacomo Montagna; Mathilde Ritter; Ramon Saccilotto; Fabienne D Schwab; Daniel Steffens; Christoph Tausch; Jasmin Zeindler; Savas D Soysal; Visnu Lohsiriwat; Tibor Kovacs; Anne Tansley; Lynda Wyld; Laszlo Romics; Mahmoud El-Tamer; Andrea L Pusic; Virgilio Sacchini; Michael Gnant
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  A Comparison of Fat Graft Processing Techniques: Outcomes in 1,158 Procedures in Prosthetic Breast Reconstructions.

Authors:  Wen-Kuan Chiu; Megan Fracol; Lauren N Feld; Cecil S Qiu; John Y S Kim
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-11-12
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.