Literature DB >> 25800298

Team cohesiveness, team size and team performance in team-based learning teams.

Britta M Thompson1, Paul Haidet, Nicole J Borges, Lisa R Carchedi, Brenda J B Roman, Mark H Townsend, Agata P Butler, David B Swanson, Michael P Anderson, Ruth E Levine.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to explore the relationships among variables associated with teams in team-based learning (TBL) settings and team outcomes.
METHODS: We administered the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) Psychiatry Subject Test first to individuals and then to teams of Year three students at four medical schools that used TBL in their psychiatry core clerkships. Team cohesion was analysed using the Team Performance Scale (TPS). Bivariate correlation and linear regression analysis were used to analyse the relationships among team-level variables (mean individual TPS scores for each team, mean individual NBME scores of teams, team size, rotation and gender make-up) and team NBME test scores. A hierarchical linear model was used to test the effects of individual TPS and individual NBME test scores within each team, as well as the effects of the team-level variables of team size, team rotation and gender on team NBME test scores. Individual NBME test and TPS scores were nested within teams and treated as subsampling units.
RESULTS: Individual NBME test scores and individual TPS scores were positively and statistically significantly (p < 0.01) associated with team NBME test scores, when team rotation, team size and gender make-up were controlled for. Higher team NBME test scores were associated with teams rotating later in the year and larger teams (p < 0.01). Gender make-up was not significantly associated.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of an NBME Psychiatry Subject Test administered to TBL teams at four medical schools suggest that larger teams on later rotations score higher on a team NBME test. Individual NBME test scores and team cohesion were positively and significantly associated with team NBME test scores. These results suggest the need for additional studies focusing on team outcomes, team cohesion, team size, rotation and other factors as they relate to the effective and efficient performance of TBL teams in health science education.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25800298     DOI: 10.1111/medu.12636

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  10 in total

1.  Impact of Team Formation Method on Student Team Performance Across Multiple Courses Incorporating Team-based Learning.

Authors:  Michelle Z Farland; Xiaoying Feng; Linda S Behar-Horenstein; Diane E Beck
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Application of Modified Team-Based Learning Approach for Enhancing Undergraduate Medical Educational Seminars.

Authors:  Somaya Hosny; Mona Ghaly; Raghda Eldesouki; Ghada Hegazy
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2019-07-26

3.  Do learning collaboratives strengthen communication? A comparison of organizational team communication networks over time.

Authors:  Alicia C Bunger; Rebecca Lengnick-Hall
Journal:  Health Care Manage Rev       Date:  2018 Jan/Mar

4.  A Synchronous Hybrid Team-Based Learning Class: Why and How to Do It?

Authors:  Irene Cheng Jie Lee; Peiyan Wong; Suzanne Pei Lin Goh; Sandy Cook
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2022-04-26

5.  Team-Based Learning in a Pipeline Course in Medical Microbiology for Under-Represented Student Populations in Medicine Improves Learning of Microbiology Concepts.

Authors:  K C Behling; M M Murphy; J Mitchell-Williams; H Rogers-McQuade; O J Lopez
Journal:  J Microbiol Biol Educ       Date:  2016-12-02

6.  Does team-based learning improve performance in an infectious diseases course in a preclinical curriculum?

Authors:  Kathryn C Behling; Rose Kim; Matthew Gentile; Osvaldo Lopez
Journal:  Int J Med Educ       Date:  2017-02-08

7.  Does team-based learning affect test scores of the basic medical sciences students in a modular curriculum?

Authors:  Masood Ahmed; Saima Athar; Saima Zainab; Shaheena Akbani; Batool Hasan; Uzma Hameed
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr

8.  The impact of asynchronous online anatomy teaching and smaller learning groups in the anatomy laboratory on medical students' performance during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Ming-Fong Chang; Meng-Lin Liao; June-Horng Lue; Chi-Chuan Yeh
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 6.652

9.  Meta-analysis on the effectiveness of team-based learning on medical education in China.

Authors:  Minjian Chen; Chunhui Ni; Yanhui Hu; Meilin Wang; Lu Liu; Xiaoming Ji; Haiyan Chu; Wei Wu; Chuncheng Lu; Shouyu Wang; Shoulin Wang; Liping Zhao; Zhong Li; Huijuan Zhu; Jianming Wang; Yankai Xia; Xinru Wang
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  Using Near-Peer Teaching to Address Concepts of Cystic Fibrosis in Undergraduate Medical Learners.

Authors:  Renée J LeClair; Andrew P Binks
Journal:  MedEdPORTAL       Date:  2020-08-28
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.