Christopher M Schlachta1, Syed Ali1, Hammood Ahmed1, Roy Eagleson2. 1. The Canadian Surgical Technologies and Advanced Robotics, London Health Sciences Centre and the Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ont. 2. The Canadian Surgical Technologies and Advanced Robotics, London Health Sciences Centre and the Faculty of Engineering, Western University, London, Ont.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recognition of tissue planes during surgery appears to be a skill acquired with experience. We conducted a pilot study to test this hypothesis using a novel method for evaluating this skill in a simulated environment. METHODS: Twelve surgeons of varying levels of experience were shown 16 captured images from a mesorectal excision. For each image, they were asked to draw the ideal dissection plane with a stylus on a tablet computer. We used a novel metric for comparing agreement between lines to determine the level of precision observed between junior and senior trainees and consultant surgeons and measure the accuracy of junior and senior trainees compared with consultant surgeons. RESULTS: We observed significant differences in precision for 9 of 16 images; 7 of these followed the predicted stepwise pattern associated with level of experience. Using consultant surgeons as the reference standard, we observed significant differences in accuracy between senior and junior trainees for 11 images, with senior trainees being more accurate in 10 of them. Only 2 images failed to contribute significant findings to our analysis. CONCLUSION: The findings of this pilot evaluation of a novel method for measuring a surgeon's ability to recognize tissue planes in a simulated model show that skill improves with experience. Further evaluation of this method will reveal its utility as an assessment tool and possibly as a training instrument.
BACKGROUND: Recognition of tissue planes during surgery appears to be a skill acquired with experience. We conducted a pilot study to test this hypothesis using a novel method for evaluating this skill in a simulated environment. METHODS: Twelve surgeons of varying levels of experience were shown 16 captured images from a mesorectal excision. For each image, they were asked to draw the ideal dissection plane with a stylus on a tablet computer. We used a novel metric for comparing agreement between lines to determine the level of precision observed between junior and senior trainees and consultant surgeons and measure the accuracy of junior and senior trainees compared with consultant surgeons. RESULTS: We observed significant differences in precision for 9 of 16 images; 7 of these followed the predicted stepwise pattern associated with level of experience. Using consultant surgeons as the reference standard, we observed significant differences in accuracy between senior and junior trainees for 11 images, with senior trainees being more accurate in 10 of them. Only 2 images failed to contribute significant findings to our analysis. CONCLUSION: The findings of this pilot evaluation of a novel method for measuring a surgeon's ability to recognize tissue planes in a simulated model show that skill improves with experience. Further evaluation of this method will reveal its utility as an assessment tool and possibly as a training instrument.
Authors: Nicholas P West; Eva J A Morris; Olorunda Rotimi; Alison Cairns; Paul J Finan; Philip Quirke Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2008-07-28 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Hamzeh Naghawi; Johnny Chau; Amin Madani; Pepa Kaneva; John Monson; Carmen Mueller; Lawrence Lee Journal: Tech Coloproctol Date: 2022-05-03 Impact factor: 3.699