Ali A Maawy1, Yukihiko Hiroshima2, Yong Zhang3, Roger Heim4, Lew Makings4, Miguel Garcia-Guzman4, George A Luiken5, Hisataka Kobayashi6, Robert M Hoffman7, Michael Bouvet8. 1. Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America. 2. Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America; AntiCancer, Inc., San Diego, California, United States of America; Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama City, Japan. 3. AntiCancer, Inc., San Diego, California, United States of America. 4. Aspyrian Therapeutics, San Diego, California, United States of America. 5. OncoFluor, Inc., San Diego, California, United States of America. 6. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America. 7. Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America; AntiCancer, Inc., San Diego, California, United States of America. 8. Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, United States of America; Surgical Service, VA Healthcare System, San Diego, California, United States of America.
Abstract
Photoimmunotherapy (PIT) of cancer utilizes tumor-specific monoclonal antibodies conjugated to a photosensitizer phthalocyanine dye IR700 which becomes cytotoxic upon irradiation with near infrared light. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of PIT on human pancreatic cancer cells in vitro and in vivo in an orthotopic nude mouse model. The binding capacity of anti-CEA antibody to BxPC-3 human pancreatic cancer cells was determined by FACS analysis. An in vitro cytotoxicity assay was used to determine cell death following treatment with PIT. For in vivo determination of PIT efficacy, nude mice were orthotopically implanted with BxPC-3 pancreatic tumors expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP). After tumor engraftment, the mice were divided into two groups: (1) treatment with anti-CEA-IR700 + 690 nm laser and (2) treatment with 690 nm laser only. Anti-CEA-IR700 (100 μg) was administered to group (1) via tail vein injection 24 hours prior to therapy. Tumors were then surgically exposed and treated with phototherapy at an intensity of 150 mW/cm2 for 30 minutes. Whole body imaging was done subsequently for 5 weeks using an OV-100 small animal imaging system. Anti-CEA-IR700 antibody bound to the BxPC3 cells to a high degree as shown by FACS analysis. Anti-CEA-IR700 caused extensive cancer cell killing after light activation compared to control cells in cytotoxicity assays. In the orthotopic models of pancreatic cancer, the anti-CEA-IR700 group had significantly smaller tumors than the control after 5 weeks (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in the body weights of mice in the anti-CEA-IR700 and control groups indicating that PIT was well tolerated by the mice.
Photoimmunotherapy (PIT) of cancer utilizes tumor-specific monoclonal antibodies conjugated to a photosensitizer phthalocyanine dye IR700 which becomes cytotoxic upon irradiation with near infrared light. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of PIT on humanpancreatic cancer cells in vitro and in vivo in an orthotopic nude mouse model. The binding capacity of anti-CEA antibody to BxPC-3humanpancreatic cancer cells was determined by FACS analysis. An in vitro cytotoxicity assay was used to determine cell death following treatment with PIT. For in vivo determination of PIT efficacy, nude mice were orthotopically implanted with BxPC-3pancreatic tumors expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP). After tumor engraftment, the mice were divided into two groups: (1) treatment with anti-CEA-IR700 + 690 nm laser and (2) treatment with 690 nm laser only. Anti-CEA-IR700 (100 μg) was administered to group (1) via tail vein injection 24 hours prior to therapy. Tumors were then surgically exposed and treated with phototherapy at an intensity of 150 mW/cm2 for 30 minutes. Whole body imaging was done subsequently for 5 weeks using an OV-100 small animal imaging system. Anti-CEA-IR700 antibody bound to the BxPC3 cells to a high degree as shown by FACS analysis. Anti-CEA-IR700 caused extensive cancer cell killing after light activation compared to control cells in cytotoxicity assays. In the orthotopic models of pancreatic cancer, the anti-CEA-IR700 group had significantly smaller tumors than the control after 5 weeks (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in the body weights of mice in the anti-CEA-IR700 and control groups indicating that PIT was well tolerated by the mice.
Photoimmunotherapy (PIT) uses tumor specific monoclonal antibodies that are conjugated to the photosensitizer phthalocyanine dye, IR700, which is cytotoxic upon irradiation with near-infrared (NIR) light [1-3].Several monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have been used with PIT in mouse models of breast cancer including trastuzumab, a monoclonal antibody (mAb) directed against humanepidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2), and panitumumab, a monoclonal antibody directed against humanepidermal growth factor receptor-1 (HER-1) [4,5]. Cell death was induced immediately after irradiating mAb-IR700–bound target cells with NIR light. In vivo tumor shrinkage after irradiation with NIR light was demonstrated in target cells expressing the epidermal growth factor receptor. The mAb-IR700 conjugates were effective when bound to the cell membrane and produced no phototoxicity when not bound, suggesting a different mechanism for PIT as compared to conventional photodynamic therapies [1].Pancreatic cancer is a lethal tumor with high rates of local and distant recurrence [6,7]. In the present study, we used a chimeric monoclonal antibody against the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) for PIT, which is often overexpressed in pancreatic cancer and has been previously utilized by our laboratory for fluorescence-guided surgery and fluorescence laparoscopy [8-17]. The anti-CEA antibody was conjugated to IR700 and used for PIT treatment of humanpancreatic cancer in orthotopic mouse models as well as pancreatic cancer cells in vitro.
Materials and Methods
Cell Culture
The humanpancreatic cancer cell line BxPC-3 was stably transduced to express green fluorescent protein (GFP) as previously described [18,19]. Cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Hyclone, Logan, UT), penicillin/streptomycin (Gibco-BRL, Carlsbad, CA), sodium pyruvate (Gibco-BRL), sodium bicarbonate (Cellgro, Manassas, VA), l-glutamine (Gibco-BRL), and minimal essential medium nonessential amino acids (Gibco-BRL). All cells were cultured at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator.
Determination of CEA antigen expression level
BxPC-3-GFP cells from a 75 cm2 flask were harvested with enzyme-free cell dissociation buffer, washed once with incubation buffer (PBS + 0.5% FBS + 0.1% sodium azide), and recovered in incubation buffer at 2 x 106 cells/ml and kept at 4°C. The cells (5 x 105) were incubated with chimeric anti-CEA antibody (Genara Biosciences LLC, Morgan Hill, CA) (10 μg/ml) in 300 μl incubation buffer for 1 hour at 4°C, washed three times with PBS and stained with an Alexa488-conjugated donkey anti humanIgG (H+L) antibody (Jackson Immunoresearch, West Grove, PA) for 45 minutes, followed by three washes with PBS. A control without anti-CEA was prepared in parallel. Flow cytometry profiles from the anti-CEA antibody-treated cells and the untreated cells were established on a Guava EasyCyte Plus flow cytometer (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA). The antibody binding capacity for anti-CEA was determined by using reference beads (Bangs Laboratories, Inc., Fishers, IN) and geometric means according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
Animals
Athymic nu/nu nude mice (AntiCancer Inc., San Diego, CA), 4–6 weeks old, were used in this study. Mice were kept in a barrier facility under HEPA filtration. Mice were fed with an autoclaved laboratory rodent diet. All mouse surgical procedures and imaging were performed with the animals anesthetized by intramuscular injection of 50% ketamine, 38% xylazine, and 12% acepromazine maleate (0.02 ml). Animals received buprenorphine (0.10 mg/kg ip) immediately prior to surgery and once a day over the next 3 days to ameliorate pain. CO2 inhalation was used for euthanasia of all animals at 5 weeks after surgery. To ensure death following CO2 asphyxiation, cervical dislocation was performed. All animal studies were conducted with an AntiCancer, Inc. Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC)-protocol specifically approved for this study and in accordance with the principals and procedures outlined in the National Institute of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Animals under Assurance Number A3873–1.
Antibody-Dye Conjugation
A water-soluble silicon-phthalocyanine derivative, IRDye700DX NHS ester was obtained from LI-COR Bioscience (Lincoln, NE). of Chimeric anti-CEA antibody (Genara Biosciences LLC) (2 mg [~ 14 nmol]) at a concentration of 2 mg/ml in 0.1 M Na2HPO4 (pH = 8.6) was incubated for 2 hours at room temperature with IR700dye NHS ester (135 ug, 70 nmol) prepared in anhydrous DMSO at 5 mmol/L. After the incubation period, the IR700-conjugate was buffer exchanged and purified with phosphate buffer saline (PBS, pH = 7.1) using Amicon Ultra Centrifugal Filter Units (EMD Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA). The IR700-mAb conjugate was repeatedly diluted with 10 ml volumes of PBS and then concentrated using the filter units until less than 2% of the unconjugated IR700 dye species remained, as determined by size exclusion HPLC (SE-HPLC). Analysis of the conjugates by SE-HPLC was performed using an Agilent 1100 HPLC system fitted with a TSKgel G2000SWxl column (Tosoh Biosciences, Tokyo, Japan). The SE-HPLC elution buffer was 1X PBS (pH = 7.1) with a flow rate of 1 ml/min. UV/Vis detection at 280 nm and 690 nm was used to determine the average dye-to-antibody ratio (DAR) for each conjugates. With this sample, a purity of 97.6% with 0.5% free dye and a DAR of 4.1 was achieved.
Tumor implantation
After confluence, BxPC-3-GFP humanpancreatic cancer cells (1 x 106) were injected subcutaneously into the flanks of nude mice and allowed to engraft and grow over a period of 4–6 weeks. Tumors were then harvested and tumor fragments (1 mm3) from subcutaneous tumors were sutured to the tail of the pancreas using 8–0 nylon surgical sutures (Ethilon; Ethicon Inc., Somerville, NJ). On completion, the tail of the pancreas was returned to the abdomen, and the incision was closed in one layer using 6–0 nylon surgical sutures (Ethilon) [20,21]. The tumor fragments were allowed to grow over a period of 2 weeks.
Cytotoxicity studies
BxPC-3 cells were seeded in white-wall 96-well plates (4,000/well) and allowed to attach overnight. Cells were incubated with the antibody conjugate, anti-CEA-IR700, (dye-antibody ratio of 5.1) at 10 mg/ml for 2 hours at 37°C. Four wells at a time were subjected to treatment with 690 nm light from an LED (Marubeni Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) at a power density of 50 mW/cm2 that was calibrated with a power meter equipped with a photodiode power sensor (Thorlabs Inc., Newton, NJ). After light treatment, the antibody solution was replaced with complete RPMI 1640 medium, containing CytoTox Green (Promega, Madison, WI) to monitor cell killing.
Photoimmunotherapy in vivo
Anti-CEA antibody (100μg) (Genara Biosciences LLC, Morgan Hill, CA) conjugated to IR700DX reconstituted to 100 μl was injected via tail vein in the treatment group 24 hours prior to intervention, while the control group had 100 μl of PBS similarly injected 24 hours prior to injection. Each group consisted of 10 mice with orthotopic BxPC-3-GFP tumors.After 24 hours, the pancreatic tumors in all 10 mice in the treatment group were exposed via a left lateral incision and imaged to detect both the GFP signal and the 700 nm signal. All the mice were subsequently subjected to photoimmunotherapy by exposing the tumor to a 690 nm laser at 150 mW/cm2 for 30 minutes for a total of 270 J/cm2. The surrounding normal tissues were protected with aluminum foil during PIT. Mice were imaged at the time of therapy and weekly thereafter with tumor exposed to evaluate response to therapy. After 5 weeks the mice were sacrificed, at which point they were imaged and had their tumors resected and weighed.
Animal Imaging
Mice were imaged weekly using the Olympus OV100 small animal imaging system (Olympus Corp. Tokyo, Japan), containing an MT-20 light source (Olympus Biosystems Planegg, Germany) and DP70 CCD camera (Olympus Corp. Tokyo, Japan) [22]. All images were analyzed using Image-J (National Institute of Health Bethesda, MD) and were processed with the use of Photoshop elements-11 (Adobe Systems Inc. San Jose, CA).
Tumor size determination
The mice in both groups had weekly laparotomy to expose the pancreatic tumors via a left lateral incision. Tumors were imaged with the OV-100 by GFP expression. Tumor size was assessed using Image-J software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland).
Statistical Analysis
All statistical analysis was done using SPSS software version 21 (IBM, Armonk, NY). For pairwise comparisons, quantitative variables were calculated using the paired-samples Student’s t-test and confirmed with the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. A p-value ≤0.05 was considered significant. 95% confidence intervals obtained on analysis of the data were configured into the error bars of the appropriate figures and graphs.
Results and Discussion
Anti-CEA-IR700 binds to CEA-expressing pancreatic cancer cells in vitro and causes extensive cell death after light activation compared to control
The anti-CEA antibody binding capacity to BxPC3humanpancreatic cancer cells was 2,227,000 binding sites per cell by FACS analysis (Fig. 1). Cells were incubated with anti-CEA-IR700 and treated with 690 nm light. At the end of the incubation, there was 100% cell death in the anti-CEA IR700 + 690 nm light group compared to a negligible amount of cell death in the no-690 nm light group (Fig. 2). Death of 690 nm light-treated cells in absence of Anti-CEA-IR700 was negligible (data not shown).
Fig 1
Staining of BxPC-3 cells with anti-CEA antibody and quantification of binding sites.
BxPC-3 cells were treated with anti-CEA antibody and stained with a fluorochrome conjugated secondary antibody against anti-CEA (red, filled), or control-stained with secondary antibody only (black, open) and analyzed by flow cytometry. Gating was for the main population (A). The anti-CEA antibody binding capacity, determined with reference beads, was very high (2,227,000 binding sites per cell) (B).
Fig 2
Light-induced cell death by cell-bound anti-CEA-IR700.
BxPC-3 cells were incubated with anti-CEA-IR700 conjugate (10 μg/ml). Rapid cell killing was observed with a dose of 32 J/cm2 of 690 nm near-infrared light (blue circles), whereas only little cell killing occurred without illumination (green triangles). Death in light-treated cells in the absence of anti-CEA-IR700 was negligible (data not shown).
Staining of BxPC-3 cells with anti-CEA antibody and quantification of binding sites.
BxPC-3 cells were treated with anti-CEA antibody and stained with a fluorochrome conjugated secondary antibody against anti-CEA (red, filled), or control-stained with secondary antibody only (black, open) and analyzed by flow cytometry. Gating was for the main population (A). The anti-CEA antibody binding capacity, determined with reference beads, was very high (2,227,000 binding sites per cell) (B).
Light-induced cell death by cell-bound anti-CEA-IR700.
BxPC-3 cells were incubated with anti-CEA-IR700 conjugate (10 μg/ml). Rapid cell killing was observed with a dose of 32 J/cm2 of 690 nm near-infrared light (blue circles), whereas only little cell killing occurred without illumination (green triangles). Death in light-treated cells in the absence of anti-CEA-IR700 was negligible (data not shown).
PIT results in a significant reduction in tumor size and weight in an orthotopic mouse model of pancreatic cancer
Two weeks after orthotopic implantation of BxPC-3-GFP tumors, engraftment was ensured and mice were divided into 2 groups with the treatment group receiving anti-CEA-IR700 conjugate (100 μg) and the control group receiving PBS (Fig. 3). Tumor size was assessed on a weekly basis to evaluate response to therapy and overall differences in progression. In the control group there was an initial exponential increase in tumor size that began to plateau at week 4 achieving a maximum average of 390.7 mm2 (95% CI [347.7, 433.7]). In contrast, in the treatment group there was an initial decrease in tumor size from baseline with a maximal response seen at week 1 (Figs. 4 and 5) with an average size of 6.65mm2 (95% CI [1.75, 11.5]). Over the course of the experiment, the tumor began to regrow, reaching a maximum average of 29.5 mm2 (95% CI [16.5, 42.5]) at 5 weeks post-treatment. The difference in tumor size between the control and the treatment groups was significant (p<0.001).
Fig 3
Experimental protocol for in vivo PIT.
Two weeks after orthotopic implantation of BxPC-3-GFP tumors, engraftment was ensured and mice were divided into 2 groups with the treatment group receiving anti-CEA-IR700 conjugate (100 μg) and the 2nd group receiving an injection with PBS. Mice were serially imaged weekly over the course of 5 weeks to measure orthotopic tumor growth.
Fig 4
GFP weekly imaging of pancreatic tumors.
Mice had their tumors exposed via a left lateral incision and imaged with the OV-100. Maximal effect of PIT was noted one week after initiation of therapy.
Fig 5
Graphical representation of tumor size over 5 weeks.
Tumor sizes were determined using image-J software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland).
Experimental protocol for in vivo PIT.
Two weeks after orthotopic implantation of BxPC-3-GFP tumors, engraftment was ensured and mice were divided into 2 groups with the treatment group receiving anti-CEA-IR700 conjugate (100 μg) and the 2nd group receiving an injection with PBS. Mice were serially imaged weekly over the course of 5 weeks to measure orthotopic tumor growth.
GFP weekly imaging of pancreatic tumors.
Mice had their tumors exposed via a left lateral incision and imaged with the OV-100. Maximal effect of PIT was noted one week after initiation of therapy.
Graphical representation of tumor size over 5 weeks.
Tumor sizes were determined using image-J software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland).At the termination of the experiment at week 5, the tumors in both groups were excised and weighed. Complete excision was confirmed with the OV-100 by GFP fluorescence. The average tumor weight was 3872 mg (95% CI [3213, 4531]) for the control group and 239.6 mg (95% CI [81, 397]) for the treatment group (p<0.001) (Figs. 6 and 7).
Fig 6
Graphical representation of tumor weights.
A significant difference was noted with average tumor weights after tumor resection. A significant difference in tumor weight was noted between the treatment and control groups (p<0.001).
Fig 7
Resected tumors.
The top panel shows the tumors from the control group and the bottom panel shows tumors from the treatment group.
Graphical representation of tumor weights.
A significant difference was noted with average tumor weights after tumor resection. A significant difference in tumor weight was noted between the treatment and control groups (p<0.001).
Resected tumors.
The top panel shows the tumors from the control group and the bottom panel shows tumors from the treatment group.The average body weights of the mice after one week of treatment were 26.3 grams (95% CI [25.1, 27.4]) for the PIT group and 25.1 grams for the control group (95% CI [24, 26.2]) which was not statistically different (p = 0.23). The average body weights of the mice 5 weeks after treatment were 29.2 grams (95% CI [28, 30.5]) for the PIT group and 28.7 grams (95% CI [27, 30.3]) for the control group which was also not statistically different (p = 0.64), indicating that PIT was well tolerated by the mice.Despite the anti-tumor effects of PIT, there was however a 100% recurrence rate. Previous studies have shown that the rate and amount of tumor cell destruction is dependent on both the conjugate dose and the light dose, the product of which results in the same cytotoxic effect regardless of the method of light delivery (continuous or intermittent) [2,23]. In this regard, further investigation is needed to assess how dosing of the anti-CEA-IR700 complex and varying the mode and amount of energy delivery could increase efficacy.A single round of treatment was employed in the present report as proof of principle in an orthotopic model of pancreatic cancer. Multiple rounds of PIT will be performed in future experiments. Repeated rounds of therapy have been shown to increase the efficacy of PIT [4]. It is expected that repeated rounds of PIT would reduce the recurrence rate. Repeated rounds of PIT should be feasible due to the low toxicity observed. PIT should be able to add the efficacy of surgery and radiation therapy when used in combination with these therapies. This will be tested in orthotopic models, including immunocompetent mice, and in experimental high metastatic models, as well as in patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) models in future experiments.
Authors: Cristina A Metildi; Sharmeela Kaushal; George A Luiken; Robert M Hoffman; Michael Bouvet Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2014-03-02 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Ali A Maawy; Yukihiko Hiroshima; Sharmeela Kaushal; George A Luiken; Robert M Hoffman; Michael Bouvet Journal: J Biomed Opt Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 3.170
Authors: Cristina A Metildi; Sharmeela Kaushal; Minya Pu; Karen A Messer; George A Luiken; Abdool R Moossa; Robert M Hoffman; Michael Bouvet Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2014-02-06 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Cristina A Metildi; Sharmeela Kaushal; George A Luiken; Mark A Talamini; Robert M Hoffman; Michael Bouvet Journal: J Surg Oncol Date: 2013-11-19 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Ali A Maawy; Yukihiko Hiroshima; Yong Zhang; George A Luiken; Robert M Hoffman; Michael Bouvet Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-05-23 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Yukihiko Hiroshima; Ali Maawy; Yong Zhang; Miguel Garcia Guzman; Roger Heim; Lew Makings; George A Luiken; Hisataka Kobayashi; Kuniya Tanaka; Itaru Endo; Robert M Hoffman; Michael Bouvet Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2015-04-17 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Hannah M Hollandsworth; Thinzar M Lwin; Siamak Amirfakhri; Filemoni Filemoni; Surinder K Batra; Robert M Hoffman; Punita Dhawan; Michael Bouvet Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2019-05-09 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Ali A Maawy; Yukihiko Hiroshima; Yong Zhang; Miguel Garcia-Guzman; George A Luiken; Hisataka Kobayashi; Robert M Hoffman; Michael Bouvet Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2015-02-19 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Michelle A Hsu; Stephanie M Okamura; C Daniel De Magalhaes Filho; Daniele M Bergeron; Ahiram Rodriguez; Melissa West; Deepak Yadav; Roger Heim; Jerry J Fong; Miguel Garcia-Guzman Journal: Cancer Immunol Immunother Date: 2022-07-01 Impact factor: 6.968
Authors: Thinzar M Lwin; Takashi Murakami; Kentaro Miyake; Paul J Yazaki; John E Shivley; Robert M Hoffman; Michael Bouvet Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2018-01-25 Impact factor: 5.344