A Jaka1, A Gutiérrez-Rivera2, A López-Pestaña3, E del Alcázar3, J Zubizarreta3, S Vildosola3, M A Arregui3, C Sarasqueta4, C Lobo5, A Tuneu3. 1. Servicio de Dermatología. Hospital Universitario Donostia, San Sebastián, España. Electronic address: ajaka@aedv.es. 2. Laboratorio de Ingeniería tisular, Instituto Biodonostia, Hospital Universitario Donostia, San Sebastián, España. 3. Servicio de Dermatología. Hospital Universitario Donostia, San Sebastián, España. 4. Unidad de Metodología, Instituto Biodonostia, Hospital Universitario Donostia, San Sebastián, España. 5. Servicio de Anatomía Patológica, Hospital Universitario Donostia, San Sebastián, España.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Cetuximab and panitumumab are monoclonal antibodies that target the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Most patients develop a papulopustular rash, which may predict tumor response. We studied whether the other adverse cutaneous effects associated with these monoclonal antibodies are also clinical predictors of response. We also reviewed publications describing approaches to treating the papulopustular rash since no evidence-based guidelines have yet been published. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 116 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving anti-EGRF therapy with cetuximab or panitumumab at Hospital Universitario Donostia. RESULTS: In total, 81.9% of the patients developed a papulopustular rash. Patients who received the most cycles of treatment with the EGFR inhibitor were at the highest risk of developing the rash, and these patients also had the most severe rash reactions (P=.03). All of the patients who exhibited a complete tumor response had the rash, and the incidence of rash was lower in patients with poor tumor response (P=.03). We also observed an association between tumor response and xerosis (53.4% of the patients who developed xerosis also exhibited tumor response, P=.002). The papulopustular rash was managed according to an algorithm developed by our department. CONCLUSIONS: Severe papulopustular rash and xerosis may be clinical predictors of good response to anti-EGFR therapy. Patients who develop a papulopustular rash should be treated promptly because suboptimal treatment of this and other adverse effects can lead to delays in taking the prescribed anti-EGFR dose or to interruption of therapy.
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES:Cetuximab and panitumumab are monoclonal antibodies that target the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Most patients develop a papulopustular rash, which may predict tumor response. We studied whether the other adverse cutaneous effects associated with these monoclonal antibodies are also clinical predictors of response. We also reviewed publications describing approaches to treating the papulopustular rash since no evidence-based guidelines have yet been published. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 116 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving anti-EGRF therapy with cetuximab or panitumumab at Hospital Universitario Donostia. RESULTS: In total, 81.9% of the patients developed a papulopustular rash. Patients who received the most cycles of treatment with the EGFR inhibitor were at the highest risk of developing the rash, and these patients also had the most severe rash reactions (P=.03). All of the patients who exhibited a complete tumor response had the rash, and the incidence of rash was lower in patients with poor tumor response (P=.03). We also observed an association between tumor response and xerosis (53.4% of the patients who developed xerosis also exhibited tumor response, P=.002). The papulopustular rash was managed according to an algorithm developed by our department. CONCLUSIONS: Severe papulopustular rash and xerosis may be clinical predictors of good response to anti-EGFR therapy. Patients who develop a papulopustular rash should be treated promptly because suboptimal treatment of this and other adverse effects can lead to delays in taking the prescribed anti-EGFR dose or to interruption of therapy.
Authors: Robin M J M van Geel; Josep Tabernero; Elena Elez; Johanna C Bendell; Anna Spreafico; Martin Schuler; Takayuki Yoshino; Jean-Pierre Delord; Yasuhide Yamada; Martijn P Lolkema; Jason E Faris; Ferry A L M Eskens; Sunil Sharma; Rona Yaeger; Heinz-Josef Lenz; Zev A Wainberg; Emin Avsar; Arkendu Chatterjee; Savina Jaeger; Eugene Tan; Kati Maharry; Tim Demuth; Jan H M Schellens Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2017-03-31 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Mario E Lacouture; Milan Anadkat; Aminah Jatoi; Tamer Garawin; Chet Bohac; Edith Mitchell Journal: Clin Colorectal Cancer Date: 2017-12-13 Impact factor: 4.481
Authors: Sacha I Rothschild; Daniel Betticher; Reinhard Zenhäusern; Sandro Anchisi; Roger von Moos; Miklos Pless; Peter Moosmann; Razvan A Popescu; Antonello Calderoni; Marco Dressler; Daniel Rauch; Stefanie Pederiva; Regina Woelky; Claudia Papet; Vera Bühler; Markus Borner Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2019-08-23 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: L Mineur; E François; C Plassot; J M Phelip; L Miglianico; L M Dourthe; N Bonichon; L Moreau; R Guimbaud; D Smith; E Achille; R Hervé; J M Bons; S Remy; R Faroux; A L Villing; A Mahamat; I Rabbia; P Soulié; I Baumgaertner; N Mathé; L Vazquez; R Boustany Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-12-21 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Matthias F Froelich; Sebastian Stintzing; Jörg Kumbrink; Thomas G P Grünewald; Ulrich Mansmann; Volker Heinemann; Thomas Kirchner; Andreas Jung Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2018-07-13