Literature DB >> 25798546

Pectineal Ligament Hysteropexy for Uterine Prolapse in Premenopausal Women by Open and Laparoscopic Approach in Indian Urban and Rural Centers.

Vivek Madhusudan Joshi1, Suhas R Otiv, Vasant B Dagade, Mahindra Borse, Rabin N Majumder, Maneesha Shrivastava, Ravindra Shelmohkar, Smita Bijwe.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate (a) the surgical outcomes of pectineal ligament hysteropexy (PLH) for uterine prolapse by laparotomy and (b) the feasibility and safety of the procedure by laparoscopic route.
METHODS: This is a retrospective consecutive case series of women who underwent PLH from January 1998 to December 2011. The prolapsed uterus was suspended with polyester tape to pectineal ligament on either side through a Cherney incision or laparoscopically at 3 urban and 3 rural hospitals in India.
RESULTS: In 194 women who underwent PLH (176 open and 18 laparoscopic), there were no intraoperative complications. The mean follow-up was 6.5 years (range, 0.5-12 years) for open method and 1 year (range, 0.5-2 years) for laparoscopic approach. There were 46 births in 40 women after the procedure including 32 vaginal and 14 cesarean deliveries. Overall, 10 women (5.1%) had uterine prolapse recurrence; 7 of these occurred after vaginal delivery. One woman had tape erosion into the bladder because of pelvic tuberculosis. At follow-up, 12 women developed cystocele, and 7 women developed portio vaginalis elongation. There were no postoperative enteroceles. Overall reoperation rate was 14.9%. Laparoscopic PLH had minimal morbidity with no recurrence over 2 years.
CONCLUSIONS: Open PLH for uterine prolapse may be safely performed and gives durable support to the prolapsed uterus with low recurrence risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25798546     DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 2151-8378            Impact factor:   2.091


  4 in total

1.  Uterine-preserving surgeries for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Kate V Meriwether; Ethan M Balk; Danielle D Antosh; Cedric K Olivera; Shunaha Kim-Fine; Miles Murphy; Cara L Grimes; Ambereen Sleemi; Ruchira Singh; Alexis A Dieter; Catrina C Crisp; David D Rahn
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Joint report on terminology for surgical procedures to treat pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after pregnancy following uterine-sparing prolapse repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sarah B Andebrhan; Ashley T Caron; Alec Szlachta-McGinn; Pooja S Parameshwar; Nicholas J Jackson; Amy E Rosenman; Jennifer T Anger; A Lenore Ackerman
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 1.932

4.  Surgical anatomy of the pectineal ligament during pectopexy surgery: The relevance to the major vascular structures.

Authors:  Çiğdem Pulatoğlu; Ozan Doğan; Mahmut Sabri Medisoğlu; Murat Yassa; Aşkı Ellibeş Kaya; İlker Selçuk; Rahime Nida Bayık
Journal:  Turk J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-04-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.