| Literature DB >> 25798062 |
Fan Yang1, Hui Huang2, Ya-Xiong Tao2.
Abstract
The melanocortin-3 receptor (MC3R) is primarily expressed in the hypothalamus and plays an important role in the regulation of energy homeostasis. Recently, some studies demonstrated that MC3R also signals through mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs), especially extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2 (ERK1/2). ERK1/2 signaling is known to alter gene expression, potentially contributing to the prolonged action of melanocortins on energy homeostasis regulation. In the present study, we performed detailed functional studies on 8 novel naturally occurring MC3R mutations recently reported, and the effects of endogenous MC3R agonist, α-melanocyte stimulating hormone (MSH), on ERK1/2 signaling on all 22 naturally occurring MC3R mutations reported to date. We found that mutants D158Y and L299V were potential pathogenic causes to obesity. Four residues, F82, D158, L249 and L299, played critical roles in different aspects of MC3R function. α-MSH exhibited balanced activity in Gs-cAMP and ERK1/2 signaling pathways in 15 of the 22 mutant MC3Rs. The other 7 mutant MC3Rs were biased to either one of the signaling pathways. In summary, we provided novel data about the structure-function relationship of MC3R, identifying residues important for receptor function. We also demonstrated that some mutations exhibited biased signaling, preferentially activating one intracellular signaling pathway, adding a new layer of complexity to MC3R pharmacology.Entities:
Keywords: ERK1/2 signaling; Melanocortin-3 receptor; biased signaling.; cAMP signaling; naturally occurring mutations
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25798062 PMCID: PMC4366641 DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.11032
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Biol Sci ISSN: 1449-2288 Impact factor: 6.580
Figure 1Schematic model of the hMC3R with the mutations investigated in this study highlighted. Mutations that induce biased signaling are also indicated.
Figure 2Quantitative measurement of cell surface (A) or total (B) expression of the novel mutant hMC3Rs by flow cytometry. In panel A, cell surface expression of mutant hMC3Rs were expressed as percentage of WT hMC3R cell surface expression after correction of the nonspecific staining in cells transiently transfected with empty vector. Data were mean ± SEM of 4-8 experiments. Star (*) indicates significantly different from WT hMC3R, P < 0.05. In panel B, total expression of mutant hMC3R were expressed as percentage of WT hMC3R total expression level after correction for the nonspecific staining. Data were mean ± SEM of at least four experiments.
Figure 3Ligand binding properties of the new mutant hMC3Rs with NDP-MSH (A) and α-MSH (B) as the ligand. Different concentrations of unlabeled NDP-MSH or α-MSH competitively displaced the binding of 125I-NDP-MSH to hMC3Rs on intact cells. Results are expressed as percentage of WT binding ± range from duplicate determinations within one experiment. All experiments were performed at least three times.
Binding and signaling properties of the 8 new mutant hMC3Rs with NDP-MSH as the ligand.
| hMC3R | NDP-MSH binding | Basal signaling (% WT) | NDP-MSH-stimulated cAMP | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IC50 (nM) | RO (% WT) | EC50 (nM) | Rmax (% WT) | ||
| WT | 6.45 ± 0.87 | 100 ± 0 | 100 ± 0 | 1.28 ± 0.49 | 100 ± 0 |
| S17T | 5.73 ± 0.48 | 136.00 ± 15.43 | 107.50 ± 24.68 | 1.24 ± 0.68 | 81.87 ± 17.35 |
| F82S | ND | 8.07 ± 1.45c | 84.05 ± 19.86 | ND | 22.99 ± 2.26c |
| D158Y | ND | ND | 54.05 ± 8.81b | ND | ND |
| V177I | 4.33 ± 1.61 | 82.96 ± 11.96 | 88.01 ± 21.52 | 0.62 ± 0.14 | 61.81 ± 10.02 |
| L249F | 7.74 ± 1.99 | 128.39 ± 23.49 | 69.48 ± 20.70 | 4.98 ± 2.54 | 50.02 ± 2.74b |
| R257S | 5.88 ± 0.12 | 73.38 ± 8.36a | 78.80 ± 13.97 | 3.26 ± 1.62 | 44.05 ± 12.03a |
| L285V | 6.07 ± 1.02 | 93.68 ± 13.78 | 52.40 ± 11.86b | 5.76 ± 2.64 | 29.71 ± 3.22b |
| L299V | ND | 8.65 ± 1.51c | 78.55 ± 15.31 | 14.84 ± 4.29a | 38.53 ± 5.31b |
a Significantly different from the WT hMC3R, P < 0.05.
b Significantly different from the WT hMC3R, P < 0.01.
c Significantly different from the WT hMC3R, P < 0.001.
ND, not detected.
The data are expressed as the mean ± SEM of at least three independent experiments for IC50, EC50, and Rmax, and at least six independent experiments for RO and basal signaling. The basal cAMP was 36.88 ± 5.89 pmol/106 cells and the Rmax was 2526.00 ± 502.11 pmol cAMP/106 cells for the WT hMC3R.
Binding and signaling properties of the 8 new mutant hMC3Rs with α-MSH as the ligand.
| hMC3R | α-MSH binding | α-MSH-stimulated cAMP | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IC50 (nM) | EC50 (nM) | Rmax (% WT) | ||
| WT | 28.49 ± 2.86 | 2.91 ± 1.42 | 100.00 | |
| S17T | 50.89 ± 4.58a | 13.92 ± 11.42 | 102.74 ± 10.19 | |
| F82S | ND | ND | 21.18 ± 6.31b | |
| D158Y | ND | ND | ND | |
| V177I | 51.28 ± 10.25 | 3.10 ± 1.96 | 80.18 ± 11.26 | |
| L249F | 58.66 ± 2.57b | 1.31 ± 0.55 | 55.99 ± 13.71 | |
| R257S | 40.81 ± 3.79 | 3.62 ± 0.35 | 61.78 ± 16.14 | |
| L285V | 124.86 ± 20.05b | 18.90 ± 10.64 | 40.95 ± 11.19a | |
| L299V | ND | 115.71 ± 50.16 | 29.03 ± 8.73a | |
a Significantly different from the WT hMC3R, P < 0.05.
b Significantly different from the WT hMC3R, P < 0.01.
ND, not detected.
The data are expressed as the mean ± SEM of at least three independent experiments. The Rmax was 2188.03 ± 638.76 pmol cAMP/106 cells for the WT hMC3R.
Figure 4Cyclic AMP signaling properties of the new mutant hMC3Rs with NDP-MSH (A) and α-MSH (B) as the ligand. Intracellular cAMP concentrations were measured as described in Materials and Methods. Results are expressed as the mean ± SEM of triplicate determinations from one experiment. All experiments were performed at least three times.
Figure 5The effect of α-MSH on ERK1/2 signaling in mutant hMC3Rs. HEK293T cells were stimulated with or without 10-5 M α-MSH for 5 min. ERK1/2 phosphorylation was measured as described in Materials and Methods. Panel A showed the representative image of one experiment. Panel B showed the densitometry results of ERK1/2 phosphorylation of the WT and mutant hMC3Rs. Results are expressed as the percentage of the value obtained in non-stimulated cells transfected with the WT hMC3R. Shown are mean ± SEM of at least four experiments. Star (*) indicates significantly different from WT basal level, P < 0.05.
The effect of α-MSH on cAMP and pERK1/2 signaling of WT and mutant hMC3Rs.
| hMC3R | α-MSH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| cAMP | pERK1/2 | Bias | |
| WT | ↑ | ↑ | No |
| S17T | ↑ | ↑ | No |
| S69C | ↑ | ↑ | No |
| A70T | ↑ | ↑ | No |
| F82S | — | ↑ | Yes |
| I87T | ↑ | — | Yes |
| N128S | ↑ | — | Yes |
| M134I | ↑ | — | Yes |
| D158Y | — | — | No |
| V177I | ↑ | ↑ | No |
| I183N | — | ↑ | Yes |
| L249F | ↑ | ↑ | No |
| L249V | ↑ | ↑ | No |
| R257S | ↑ | ↑ | No |
| A260V | ↑ | ↑ | No |
| M275T | ↑ | ↑ | No |
| T280S | — | — | No |
| L285V | ↑ | ↑ | No |
| A293T | ↑ | ↑ | No |
| L297V | ↑ | — | Yes |
| L299V | ↑ | ↑ | No |
| I335S | — | ↑ | Yes |
| X361S | ↑ | ↑ | No |
“↑”: Denotes increased activity compared to the basal level. “−”: denotes no significant changes between basal and maximal signaling levels. “Bias” column is designed to demonstrate whether α-MSH-stimulated cAMP and pERK1/2 signaling pathways were divergent. “Yes” denotes biased activation of either signaling pathway; “No” denotes balanced cAMP and pERK1/2 signaling.
Figure 6Basal pERK1/2 signaling of mutant hMC3Rs. Results are expressed as percentage of WT basal pERK1/2 level. Shown are mean ± SEM of at least four experiments. Star (*) indicates significantly different from WT hMC3R, P < 0.05.