Literature DB >> 25797869

Brain plasticity and rehabilitation in stroke patients.

Yukihiro Hara1.   

Abstract

In recent years, our understanding of motor learning, neuroplasticity and functional recovery after the occurrence of brain lesion has grown significantly. Novel findings in basic neuroscience have provided an impetus for research in motor rehabilitation. The brain reveals a spectrum of intrinsic capacities to react as a highly dynamic system which can change the properties of its neural circuits. This brain plasticity can lead to an extreme degree of spontaneous recovery and rehabilitative training may modify and boost the neuronal plasticity processes. Animal studies have extended these findings, providing insight into a broad range of underlying molecular and physiological events. Neuroimaging studies in human patients have provided observations at the systems level that often parallel findings in animals. In general, the best recoveries are associated with the greatest return toward the normal state of brain functional organization. Reorganization of surviving central nervous system elements supports behavioral recovery, for example, through changes in interhemispheric lateralization, activity of association cortices linked to injured zones, and organization of cortical representational maps. Evidence from animal models suggests that both motor learning and cortical stimulation alter intracortical inhibitory circuits and can facilitate long-term potentiation and cortical remodeling. Current researches on the physiology and use of cortical stimulation animal models and in humans with stroke related hemiplegia are reviewed in this article. In particular, electromyography (EMG) -controlled electrical muscle stimulation improves the motor function of the hemiparetic arm and hand. A multi-channel near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) studies in which the hemoglobin levels in the brain were non-invasively and dynamically measured during functional activity found that the cerebral blood flow in the injured sensory-motor cortex area is greatest during an EMG-controlled FES session. Only a few idea is, however, known for the optimal timing of the different processes and therapeutic interventions and for their interactions in detail. Finding optimal rehabilitation paradigms requires an optimal organization of the internal processes of neural plasticity and the therapeutic interventions in accordance with defined plastic time windows. In this review the mechanisms of spontaneous plasticity after stroke and experimental interventions to enhance plasticity are summarized, with an emphasis on functional electrical stimulation therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25797869     DOI: 10.1272/jnms.82.4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nippon Med Sch        ISSN: 1345-4676            Impact factor:   0.920


  44 in total

1.  Motor recovery beginning 23 years after ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Peter Sörös; Robert Teasell; Daniel F Hanley; J David Spence
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Structural and functional reorganization following unilateral internal capsule infarction contribute to neurological function recovery.

Authors:  Qiuhong Lu; Gelun Huang; Li Chen; Wenmei Li; Zhijian Liang
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2019-08-10       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 3.  Relation Between EEG Measures and Upper Limb Motor Recovery in Stroke Patients: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Giada Milani; Annibale Antonioni; Andrea Baroni; Paola Malerba; Sofia Straudi
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 4.275

4.  Preclinical Characterization of Antioxidant Quinolyl Nitrone QN23 as a New Candidate for the Treatment of Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Emma Martínez-Alonso; Alejandro Escobar-Peso; Alicia Aliena-Valero; Germán Torregrosa; Mourad Chioua; Rocío Fernández-Serra; Daniel González-Nieto; Youness Ouahid; Juan B Salom; Jaime Masjuan; José Marco-Contelles; Alberto Alcázar
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-16

5.  Artificially-reconstructed brain images with stroke lesions from non-imaging data: modeling in categorized patients based on lesion occurrence and sparsity.

Authors:  Stephanie Sutoko; Hirokazu Atsumori; Akiko Obata; Ayako Nishimura; Tsukasa Funane; Masashi Kiguchi; Akihiko Kandori; Koji Shimonaga; Seiji Hama; Toshio Tsuji
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  The effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation in improving visual and auditory attention in ischemic stroke patients.

Authors:  Samira Hasanzadeh Pashang; Hossein Zare; Ahmad Alipour; Mahdi Sharif-Alhoseini
Journal:  Acta Neurol Belg       Date:  2020-02-06       Impact factor: 2.396

Review 7.  Postacute Cognitive Rehabilitation for Adult Brain Tumor Patients.

Authors:  Christina Weyer-Jamora; Melissa S Brie; Tracy L Luks; Ellen M Smith; Shawn L Hervey-Jumper; Jennie W Taylor
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  The Effectiveness of Additional Core Stability Exercises in Improving Dynamic Sitting Balance, Gait and Functional Rehabilitation for Subacute Stroke Patients (CORE-Trial): Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Rosa Cabanas-Valdés; Lídia Boix-Sala; Montserrat Grau-Pellicer; Juan Antonio Guzmán-Bernal; Fernanda Maria Caballero-Gómez; Gerard Urrútia
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-19       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Psychological Complications at 3 Months Following Stroke: Prevalence and Correlates Among Stroke Survivors in Lebanon.

Authors:  Walaa Khazaal; Maram Taliani; Celina Boutros; Linda Abou-Abbas; Hassan Hosseini; Pascale Salameh; Najwane Said Sadier
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-10

10.  Is two better than one? Muscle vibration plus robotic rehabilitation to improve upper limb spasticity and function: A pilot randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Rocco Salvatore Calabrò; Antonino Naro; Margherita Russo; Demetrio Milardi; Antonino Leo; Serena Filoni; Antonia Trinchera; Placido Bramanti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.