| Literature DB >> 25797864 |
Karina Reyner1, Alan C Heffner2, J Lee Garvey1, Vivek S Tayal1.
Abstract
Acute vascular thrombotic disease, including acute myocardial infarction and pulmonary embolism, accounts for 70% of sudden outpatient cardiac arrest. The role of intra-arrest thrombolytic administration aimed at reversing the underlying cause of cardiac arrest remains an area of debate with recent guidelines advising against routine use. We present a case of prolonged refractory ventricular fibrillation electrical storm in a patient who demonstrated intra-arrest electrocardiographic and sonographic markers confirming acute myocardial infarction. Return of spontaneous circulation was rapidly achieved after rescue intra-arrest bolus thrombolysis.Highlights of this case are discussed in the context of the current evidence for thrombolytic therapy in cardiac arrest with specific attention to the issue of patient selection.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25797864 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.12.050
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Am J Emerg Med ISSN: 0735-6757 Impact factor: 2.469