Literature DB >> 25797794

Predicting protein interface residues using easily accessible on-line resources.

Surabhi Maheshwari, Michal Brylinski.   

Abstract

It has been more than a decade since the completion of the Human Genome Project that provided us with a complete list of human proteins. The next obvious task is to figure out how various parts interact with each other. On that account, we review 10 methods for protein interface prediction, which are freely available as web servers. In addition, we comparatively evaluate their performance on a common data set comprising different quality target structures. We find that using experimental structures and high-quality homology models, structure-based methods outperform those using only protein sequences, with global template-based approaches providing the best performance. For moderate-quality models, sequence-based methods often perform better than those structure-based techniques that rely on fine atomic details. We note that post-processing protocols implemented in several methods quantitatively improve the results only for experimental structures, suggesting that these procedures should be tuned up for computer-generated models. Finally, we anticipate that advanced meta-prediction protocols are likely to enhance interface residue prediction. Notwithstanding further improvements, easily accessible web servers already provide the scientific community with convenient resources for the identification of protein-protein interaction sites.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  interfacial residues; protein interface prediction; protein models; protein–protein complexes; protein–protein interactions; web servers

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25797794      PMCID: PMC6609008          DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbv009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brief Bioinform        ISSN: 1467-5463            Impact factor:   11.622


  18 in total

1.  Are protein-protein interfaces special regions on a protein's surface?

Authors:  Sam Tonddast-Navaei; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  A hybrid method for protein-protein interface prediction.

Authors:  Howook Hwang; Donald Petrey; Barry Honig
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Elucidating the druggable interface of protein-protein interactions using fragment docking and coevolutionary analysis.

Authors:  Fang Bai; Faruck Morcos; Ryan R Cheng; Hualiang Jiang; José N Onuchic
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Structure-based prediction of ligand-protein interactions on a genome-wide scale.

Authors:  Howook Hwang; Fabian Dey; Donald Petrey; Barry Honig
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  DRNApred, fast sequence-based method that accurately predicts and discriminates DNA- and RNA-binding residues.

Authors:  Jing Yan; Lukasz Kurgan
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 6.  Physiological Consequences of Compartmentalized Acyl-CoA Metabolism.

Authors:  Daniel E Cooper; Pamela A Young; Eric L Klett; Rosalind A Coleman
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Identification and visualization of protein binding regions with the ArDock server.

Authors:  Sébastien Reille; Mélanie Garnier; Xavier Robert; Patrice Gouet; Juliette Martin; Guillaume Launay
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Protein-protein interaction specificity is captured by contact preferences and interface composition.

Authors:  Francesca Nadalin; Alessandra Carbone
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Local Geometry and Evolutionary Conservation of Protein Surfaces Reveal the Multiple Recognition Patches in Protein-Protein Interactions.

Authors:  Elodie Laine; Alessandra Carbone
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Predicted binding site information improves model ranking in protein docking using experimental and computer-generated target structures.

Authors:  Surabhi Maheshwari; Michal Brylinski
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2015-11-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.