Literature DB >> 25797762

Retained foreign bodies: risk and outcomes at the national level.

Zaid H Al-Qurayshi1, Adam T Hauch1, Douglas P Slakey1, Emad Kandil2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Retained foreign bodies (RFB) after operative interventions are linked to an increased risk of morbidity and mortality, and represent a medico-legal liability. We aimed to identify associated risk factors and outcomes related to iatrogenic RFB in the United States. STUDY
DESIGN: A cross-sectional analysis was performed on all interventions that resulted in a secondary diagnosis of RFB in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2003 to 2009. Comparative controls were randomly selected from patients who underwent similar procedures.
RESULTS: We identified 3,045 cases of RFB, and 12,592 controls were included. The majority of incidents, 968 (31.8%), were reported after gastrointestinal interventions. Risk of RFB was higher in teaching hospitals (odds ratio [OR] 1.31, 95% CI [1.19, 1.45], p < 0.001). For abdominopelvic procedures, patients admitted with traumatic injuries did not demonstrate a higher risk of RFB compared with electively admitted patients (OR 1.70, 95% CI [0.94, 3.07], p = 0.08). However, for procedures unrelated to abdominopelvic surgery, patients admitted for trauma had a lower risk (OR 0.62, 95% CI [0.50, 0.78], p < 0.001). Obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m(2)) and older age (≥ 65 years) were significantly associated with a higher risk only for abdominopelvic procedures (p < 0.01 for both). Retained foreign bodies were associated with a higher average cost of health services ($26,678.00 ± $769.69 vs $12,648.00 ± $192.80, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Retained foreign bodies have unfavorable and nationally tangible clinical and economic outcomes. The risk profile for RFB at the national level seems to demonstrate an association with demographic and clinical factors including nature of the procedure, type of admission, and trauma status. Teaching hospitals are associated with a higher risk. Targeted efforts toward identified high-risk populations are needed to avoid these morbid and costly complications.
Copyright © 2015 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25797762     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.12.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  3 in total

1.  Incidence and OR team awareness of "near-miss" and retained surgical sharps: a national survey on United States operating rooms.

Authors:  Samuel A Weprin; Dielle Meyer; Rui Li; Umberto Carbonara; Fabio Crocerossa; Fernando J Kim; Riccardo Autorino; John E Speich; Adam P Klausner
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2021-04-03

Review 2.  Exploring Risk, Antecedents and Human Costs of Living with a Retained Surgical Item: A Narrative Synthesis of Australian Case Law 1981-2018.

Authors:  Sonya R Osborne; Tina Cockburn; Juliet Davis
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2021-08-31

Review 3.  Risk factors and preventive strategies for unintentionally retained surgical sharps: a systematic review.

Authors:  Samuel Weprin; Fabio Crocerossa; Dielle Meyer; Kaitlyn Maddra; David Valancy; Reginald Osardu; Hae Sung Kang; Robert H Moore; Umberto Carbonara; Fernando J Kim; Riccardo Autorino
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2021-07-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.